It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That happened in the 2000 elections when Gore won the popular vote. It happened before also.
With the lack of enthusiasm for the other contenders it seems the two most vocal factions are the Ron Pauls and the Non-Pauls. Anyone else gets only passing accolades.
The count in some of the primaries so far don't seem to make perfect sense either. The only openly televised count in Nevada last week had Paul winning around 3 to 1 over his closest challenger. That was a special voting time to permit Seventh-Day Adventists and strict Jews a chance to vote that was not on their sabbath; and they are not really thought to be Paul's strongest base of voters - possibly why it was allowed to be televised.
World is full of surprises.
Are Paul supporters posing as delegates for the other candidates as well?
Originally posted by NeoVain
Originally posted by Kenrichaed
Ron Paul only has 8 while Romney has 94 so how can you say he's winning?
elections.nytimes.com...
Paul is in 4th place as far as delegates go.
New york times?
And here is CNN
www.cnn.com...
Get the point?
Not one of these MSM outlets actually bother with the real numbers, they just want to get some numbers out to get credit. The only thing they have in common is their bias against Ron Paul, and you deem them trustworthy?
Someone who SHOULD know the real numbers, on the other hand, is Ron Paul... with his ancient knowledge of the system.edit on 11-2-2012 by NeoVain because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Observor
reply to post by Erongaricuaro
World is full of surprises.
If that is intended to say that somehow the GOP is rigging the process against Paul, it is inconsistent with the hopes that Paul can win delegates...
That happened in the 2000 elections when Gore won the popular vote. It happened before also.
I am not talking about popular vote. Gore won the popular vote, but lost the electoral votes.
I don't think it ever happened that the electors in the electoral college voted for someone other than the person on whose name they were elected, not enough to make a difference anyway. Failing to win the straw poll, but winning the delegates is not much different from failing to carry the different states in the elections, but winning over the electors elected on the opponent's name, although the latter is more difficult to accomplish.
If Paul is depending on using the system rather than popular appeal, as appears to be the case in winning the GOP nomination, to get to the White House, it is a definite possibility.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by NeoVain
Yes that is Ron Paul's strategy.
Overturn the will of the people by having delegates pledge to vote at the convention directly against the majority of the voters.
I would love to hear what Ron Paul supporters would say if a different candidate did this...if an overwhelming majority of the people voted for Ron Paul...but the delegate went to someone else???
So Ron Paul supporters, you are right...there is fraud going on...fraud against the people...and it is being done by the Ron Paul campaign.
This is an exciting erection coming up!!!
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by NeoVain
Yes that is Ron Paul's strategy.
Overturn the will of the people by having delegates pledge to vote at the convention directly against the majority of the voters.
I would love to hear what Ron Paul supporters would say if a different candidate did this...if an overwhelming majority of the people voted for Ron Paul...but the delegate went to someone else???
So Ron Paul supporters, you are right...there is fraud going on...fraud against the people...and it is being done by the Ron Paul campaign.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by NeoVain
Yes that is Ron Paul's strategy.
Overturn the will of the people by having delegates pledge to vote at the convention directly against the majority of the voters.
I would love to hear what Ron Paul supporters would say if a different candidate did this...if an overwhelming majority of the people voted for Ron Paul...but the delegate went to someone else???
So Ron Paul supporters, you are right...there is fraud going on...fraud against the people...and it is being done by the Ron Paul campaign.
On the other hand, however, you have the majority of the GOP voting base just voting for who they think will "beat Obama" so they just vote for who is winning.
This is completely ridiculous Outkast. You're calling fraud when people are utilizing the system the way it was intended to be utilized? So, let me get this straight. You're calling Ron Paul supporters fraudsters for staying around and voting for delegates? It's the fault of Ron Paul supporters that the other candidates supporters aren't smart enough to do the same? Fraud??? The only time you will call fraud is when you can grasp at straws and blame the Ron Paul crowd for voting in delegates? I can tolerate some of your posts, but this one lacks class and intelligence. Horrible post.
LOL hey, don't blame dedicated supporters for fraud just because they're actually doing what they are supposed to do to get their candidate the nomination. If another candidate was doing this, you know what would be the logical response? Go out there and make sure the process is complete for our candidate!. This isn't American Idol ok.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
If you think people are going to support Ron Paul who just overturned their vote by trickery...I think you are mistaken. Nothing disenfranchises voters more than outright telling them their vote didn't count for anything.