Ron Paul is Winning! (Delegates Explained), page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 23 times


reply posted on 11-2-2012 @ 06:14 AM by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by NeoVain



It says her name right at the top. Are you pretending not to know her because she is a liberal?
edit on 11-2-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 11-2-2012 @ 06:21 AM by NeoVain
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to
post by NeoVain



It says her name right at the top. Are you pretending not to know her because she is a liberal?
edit on 11-2-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)


No sorry wasn´t sure if it was her name of someone elses name, but removed that question mark now, since you confirmed it for me, so thanks


reply posted on 11-2-2012 @ 06:50 AM by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by NeoVain



I'm hopeful of this too, but saying he is winning is doing the same thing the media is with the others. We just hope he is. I am afraid that this info came out way too soon though. The GOP and other supporters are going to start countering this way to early for it to be effective.

I don't know, he needs to win a state. I really think there was fraud to keep Santorum in because they need to dice up the votes. It should have already been down to Paul and Romney by now.


reply posted on 11-2-2012 @ 07:10 AM by Mandrakerealmz
reply to post by NeoVain



So does New Zealand :'( It does many things. And the government lie about all of it. Calcification of the pineal gland seems most distressing


reply posted on 11-2-2012 @ 11:31 AM by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Kenrichaed



Actually he is officially in 3rd place, he will rise to second when the most recent delegates are tallied.

Here is the ACTUAL delegate count.
NPR Delegate Tracker

and here is an article on why it's bad to count the unofficial delegates and why NPR wont do it.
Here

On Thursday, uber-primary watcher Josh Putnam warns of extrapolating delegate counts from states that do not explicitly tie election results to the actual allocation of delegates.
edit on 11-2-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-2-2012 @ 11:34 AM by Kenrichaed
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow



Your tracker hasn't been updated for 4 days, the link I gave is constantly updating.


reply posted on 11-2-2012 @ 11:47 AM by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Kenrichaed



You are still missing the point.
It is national public radio. They are on top of it. The reason it hasn't been updated in 4 days is because no delegates have been officially added to any candidate. When they are, then they will update it.

I just said on the other thread that that is what is wrong with 24/7 news stations. They have a tendency to get into the predictive news business.

Trust me NPR is a much more credible station that any of the other MSM stations.
edit on 11-2-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-2-2012 @ 11:53 AM by NeoVain
Originally posted by Kenrichaed
Ron Paul only has 8 while Romney has 94 so how can you say he's winning?

elections.nytimes.com...

Paul is in 4th place as far as delegates go.


New york times?

And here is CNN

www.cnn.com...

Get the point?

Not one of these MSM outlets actually bother with the real numbers, they just want to get some numbers out to get credit. The only thing they have in common is their bias against Ron Paul, and you deem them trustworthy?

Someone who SHOULD know the real numbers, on the other hand, is Ron Paul... with his ancient knowledge of the system.
edit on 11-2-2012 by NeoVain because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul Won (Great Read) - Huffington Post
  Posted 13 days ago with 127 member flags
Texas GOP Mutiny - SC, VA, LA and Others May Join
  Posted 15 days ago with 83 member flags
A Common Man\'s Guide to the Federal Budget.
  Posted 3 days ago with 51 member flags
*VID* Ron Paul delegates speak out from RNC.
  Posted 8 days ago with 39 member flags