Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi

Originally posted by ThoughtForms

Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi

Originally posted by talisman
I'm not impressed at all. That is dangerous for heaven's sake, even if the animals are trained. Children that young should not be around wild animals of that kind, even if they have been domesticated.

Damn right, we should separate all humans from animals. Even more so, we should train children at a young age that the only time you should be close to a wild beast is if you have a gun sighted on them. There can be no connection between us and them, because we are superior and they are dangerous.

Does that just about sum up your opinion? (I was being sarcastic, by the way)

wow you are a freaking moron. Your respond to logic with sarcastic parodies... I have no doubts in my mind that you respond in a similar way to ANYTHING that challenges the ideas you are fond of.

If you aren't willing to learn no one can help you.
If you ARE willing to learn no one can stop you.

-TF

With your attitude, the lion would defintely eat you if you tried to pet it

I actually found that a mature, kind and comical response. while I'm aware that I said I wouldn't return, I just want to say I've actually got a remarkable connection with animals. the most recent example I can think of is how a dog (I have photo's) was dumped (I live rural) and found its way to my driveway and collapsed from exhaustion. I fed it, gave it water and sat with it for about an hour. This dogs skull was as wide as my 2 fists together and I was #ing scared and it knew it. but I chilled out...got the food...later on I talked to it and we made friends. then it was barking and threatening anyone that came near my now gated off driveway as it did towards me at first... It bit the rangers hand when he came to pick it up and take it to the local shelter (no kill policy) anyway my point is that I do fine with animals unless I'm scared and as long as I'm real with them, which requires me to be real with myself. Which most people cannot do.

I have also gotten within 10metres or less of wild grey back kangaroos if by myself. The most recent was a young one and i was troubled because the large male did not dig it staying behind to sit near me (unusual behaviour for a young roo) and observe me while the rest of the pack was getting out of there (typical for roo's).. I can do these things but spend %90 of my life indoors so don't have many stories to tell... my dog will stop barking and come inside if I click my fingers and I think I've raised my voice to her maybe a dozen times in my life if that.... you just respect an animal and demand it back whilst only showing kindness and its all good.... but cats, of any kind, can and will turn on you because they like to play, and there form of play is dangerous to us more fragile bags of flesh.... that ish is obvious to most people....

Peace,
-TF

P.S) I can't remember if the roo's are called redbacks or greybacks now but they're bigger then usual....

And then they claim that Indigo children don't exist. Mainstream science is so arrogant. Screw them.

As a parent of kids about the same age as Tippi in those videoes, I would be nervous as hell watching my kids with animals like that, with no possibility of getting to a hospital in time if they were injured. Incredible.

Indigo girl ?

she is more like Tarzan girl
but great little girl that have bounded with mother nature perfectly

They found a young girl living in the wild .. dont remember when
it think this is her

what they did after finding here
took the girl to the forest to document how well she likes playing in the wild with the animals

Great vid

Originally posted by quedup
I really would like to think that this is an Indigo Child but I'm afraid all I see is a Father who is into Photography and is willing to risk the life of his child for a good pic.

Most wild animals are able to recognize a baby or an infant - some will respect that - like the Gorilla a few years back who picked up a child who'd fallen into the pit at the zoo and nursed him - but not all wild animals will respect that - after all, they are animals! (Some care more than humans!)

This child has clearly been raised with the animals she interacts with - and her Parents have taken a huge risk.

She won't be able to do this as an adult - (perhaps may be lucky in one or two shots)

Huge Risk - she is not an Indigo child as much as I too would like to believe it.

'Don't try this at home'

History is littered with dead animal heroes and Tippi will be just as tasty!

as much as I would like to disagree with you I cant, it is obvious she was raised with the big cat and the elephant. The snake and lizard stuff not big deal. The only picture I see as true proof is the gator shot with her on one foot on the back of the gator.

I want this to be real, so it is easy to see what I want and read into this what I want to be true.

I don't believe 'Indigo' children exist. Look up any sort of discription and it is fraught with doubt of any true 'Indigo' personality or 'trait'. I believe it's more a new wave , new age kind of romanticism.

Originally posted by Plotus
I don't believe 'Indigo' children exist. Look up any sort of discription and it is fraught with doubt of any true 'Indigo' personality or 'trait'. I believe it's more a new wave , new age kind of romanticism.

Thats not to deny that she is a remarkable and charismic young lady.

All Indigo discussion aside

As well as the fact that these are tamed animals raised to be around people.....

It is still pretty cool to see such a little person with these huge animals!!

My only question is about the photo with her on top of a crocodile...how well trained can a crocodile be?

Also questioning the parents motives and intelligence, maybe that is just me though....

Interesting post for sure, perhaps for reasons different than the originally intended message.

Thats a leopard in that second video you posted.

Just a heads up.