It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by talisman
I'm not impressed at all. That is dangerous for heaven's sake, even if the animals are trained. Children that young should not be around wild animals of that kind, even if they have been domesticated.
Originally posted by LongbottomLeaf
reply to post by L00kingGlass
I can also stage events with preserve animals whoopdee dooooooo
Wow, you and Revolution9 should be best friends, you would form the most saddest sorry depressing pair of friends on the whole damn planet... such a union would probably form a black hole of negativity, sucking us all into your gloomy perception of reality.
Originally posted by LongbottomLeaf
reply to post by L00kingGlass
I can also stage events with preserve animals whoopdee dooooooo
Originally posted by priestlight
I gotta tell yaz, I loved this post! I have been a behind the scenes ATS reader for a few years now. Never joining just reading. I thought joining would flag me a fusion center!...lol....by now I am sure I am flagged anyway so why not join.
Anyway, this post really touched my heart, the calm interaction with creation just gave me peace....
TY again for the thread GREAT JOB!
PriestLight
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by talisman
I'm not impressed at all. That is dangerous for heaven's sake, even if the animals are trained. Children that young should not be around wild animals of that kind, even if they have been domesticated.
Damn right, we should separate all humans from animals. Even more so, we should train children at a young age that the only time you should be close to a wild beast is if you have a gun sighted on them. There can be no connection between us and them, because we are superior and they are dangerous.
Does that just about sum up your opinion? (I was being sarcastic, by the way)
What's with this sudden influx of negativity? If you took a few moments to read the damn thread, you would see I copied the title of this thread from the video. And if you read my comments on page 2 I clearly state everyone has the ability to connect with animals, and that this has nothing to do with Indigo children. And I just assumed it was a Cheetah because that's what the title of the second video says it is.
Originally posted by ThoughtForms
reply to post by eRastaMouse
since when has anyone who believes in indigo children been concerned with facts...or accuracy...or sources...
-TF
You do have a point, but she grew up with many of these animals, and she treated them like her siblings. She had close bonds to many of these animals, and her mother believed she was never in any real danger. When you take the time the understand animals, they don't suddenly snap and kill you for no reason. That is what caged up animals do when they are treated as entertainment for Humans.
Originally posted by talisman
That is not being realistic. Animals of this sort are largely not predictable, and there have been many cases where these types of animals do go off, and its awful to put a young child in harms way.
"Farmers often keep orphan animals and raise them in their house," her mother said. "Sometimes they are tame or used to humans and so this is how Tippi was able to be so close with them.
"If I had the least fear I would not have let Tippi anywhere near them. She was only ever bitten once and that was on the nose by a Meerkat."
Originally posted by talisman
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by talisman
I'm not impressed at all. That is dangerous for heaven's sake, even if the animals are trained. Children that young should not be around wild animals of that kind, even if they have been domesticated.
Damn right, we should separate all humans from animals. Even more so, we should train children at a young age that the only time you should be close to a wild beast is if you have a gun sighted on them. There can be no connection between us and them, because we are superior and they are dangerous.
Does that just about sum up your opinion? (I was being sarcastic, by the way)
That is not being realistic. Animals of this sort are largely not predictable, and there have been many cases where these types of animals do go off, and its awful to put a young child in harms way.
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by talisman
I'm not impressed at all. That is dangerous for heaven's sake, even if the animals are trained. Children that young should not be around wild animals of that kind, even if they have been domesticated.
Damn right, we should separate all humans from animals. Even more so, we should train children at a young age that the only time you should be close to a wild beast is if you have a gun sighted on them. There can be no connection between us and them, because we are superior and they are dangerous.
Does that just about sum up your opinion? (I was being sarcastic, by the way)
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Assuming that all animals are dangerous is pure ignorance.
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
What's with this sudden influx of negativity? If you took a few moments to read the damn thread, you would see I copied the title of this thread from the video. And if you read my comments on page 2 I clearly state everyone has the ability to connect with animals, and that this has nothing to do with Indigo children. And I just assumed it was a Cheetah because that's what the title of the second video says it is. So in conclusion, get a god damn life!
Originally posted by ThoughtForms
reply to post by eRastaMouse
since when has anyone who believes in indigo children been concerned with facts...or accuracy...or sources...
-TF
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by talisman
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by talisman
I'm not impressed at all. That is dangerous for heaven's sake, even if the animals are trained. Children that young should not be around wild animals of that kind, even if they have been domesticated.
Damn right, we should separate all humans from animals. Even more so, we should train children at a young age that the only time you should be close to a wild beast is if you have a gun sighted on them. There can be no connection between us and them, because we are superior and they are dangerous.
Does that just about sum up your opinion? (I was being sarcastic, by the way)
That is not being realistic. Animals of this sort are largely not predictable, and there have been many cases where these types of animals do go off, and its awful to put a young child in harms way.
Have you ever seen this happen for yourself, or just read about it?
Because I grew up in a rural setting and saw wild animals all the time. They are really only violent if they are sick (specifically starving), feel threatened (ie, you have a gun pointed at them), or have had negative experiences with people in the past (ie, been shot before).
Assuming that all animals are dangerous is pure ignorance. Just because we live in houses doesn't mean that animals are not like us, without thought or emotion. I have looked into the eyes of wild deer and bear before and the only problem that I see is the disconnect that humans have created between us and them in order just to be the top tier species on this planet.
That being said, I wouldn't put my kid under the paws of a wild animal but to assume that wild animals are automatically dangerous is a bit much.edit on 12-2-2012 by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi because: bear, not beer haha
Originally posted by ThoughtForms
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by talisman
I'm not impressed at all. That is dangerous for heaven's sake, even if the animals are trained. Children that young should not be around wild animals of that kind, even if they have been domesticated.
Damn right, we should separate all humans from animals. Even more so, we should train children at a young age that the only time you should be close to a wild beast is if you have a gun sighted on them. There can be no connection between us and them, because we are superior and they are dangerous.
Does that just about sum up your opinion? (I was being sarcastic, by the way)
wow you are a freaking moron. Your respond to logic with sarcastic parodies... I have no doubts in my mind that you respond in a similar way to ANYTHING that challenges the ideas you are fond of.
If you aren't willing to learn no one can help you.
If you ARE willing to learn no one can stop you.
-TF
Because it instills in them a healthy respect for nature, instead of an unhealthy fear of nature. She grew up to be a very fine young lady who is trying to make a difference in the world, which is much more than I can say for most people.
I see no good reason for putting children of this age at this sort of risk.