Ron Paul and 9/11

page: 2
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 22 2012 @ 08:17 AM
link   
reply to post by DrEugeneFixer
 


What gives you the impression "these people" would hurt anybody? Are you concerned that the US servicemembers, which support Ron Paul, will turn violent and use their military training on the population if their expectations in this election are not met? Do republicans have a history of leaning towards violence?

Or do you just dislike Republicans and are trying to promulgate the idea Republicans are violent?

edit on 22-2-2012 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 22 2012 @ 02:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Cassius666
 



Originally posted by Cassius666
What gives you the impression "these people" would hurt anybody? Are you concerned that the US servicemembers, which support Ron Paul, will turn violent and use their military training on the population if their expectations in this election are not met? Do republicans have a history of leaning towards violence?
edit on 22-2-2012 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)



Paranoid racists have a long history of violence in this country. There are plenty of these in the Ron Paul camp, primarily because he panders to racists and Birchers.

I said nothing about Republicans in general, nor about our country's veterans, so the idea that those groups are violent threats must have come from your own mind.



posted on Feb, 22 2012 @ 03:05 PM
link   
Ron Paul, We've Been Neo-Conned! (excellent article, must read)

Politics / US Politics
Feb 14, 2012 - 07:23 AM

By: Dr. Ron Paul

The modern-day, limited-government movement has been co-opted. The conservatives have failed in their effort to shrink the size of government. There has not been, nor will there soon be, a conservative revolution in Washington. Political party control of the federal government has changed, but the inexorable growth in the size and scope of government has continued unabated. The liberal arguments for limited government in personal affairs and foreign military adventurism were never seriously considered as part of this revolution.

Full article here
www.marketoracle.co.uk...

He knows damn well that 9/11 was a false flag pretext, but just can't say it outright.

edit on 22-2-2012 by NewAgeMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 22 2012 @ 05:15 PM
link   
reply to post by DrEugeneFixer
 


You were talking about ron paul supporters. Guess who got the most donations from the military.



posted on Feb, 22 2012 @ 06:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by DrEugeneFixer
 



Guess who got the most donations from the military.


Same guy who takes money from Stormfronters?
edit on 2/22/2012 by DrEugeneFixer because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 24 2012 @ 05:21 AM
link   
reply to post by NewAgeMan
 


>>He knows damn well that 9/11 was a false flag pretext, but just can't say it outright.

Exactly.

Dont we all? Some of us dont fear speaking our minds of course, but RP is in a different situation.

btw hooper and goodoldave are long standing disinfo agents, just so you know



posted on Feb, 24 2012 @ 05:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by hmmmbeer
reply to post by NewAgeMan
 


>>He knows damn well that 9/11 was a false flag pretext, but just can't say it outright.

Exactly.

Dont we all? Some of us dont fear speaking our minds of course, but RP is in a different situation.

btw hooper and goodoldave are long standing disinfo agents, just so you know



If it's so obvious that 9/11 was a false flag, and a generally popular notion, why is it so undesirable for Ron Paul to tell the Truth?



posted on Feb, 24 2012 @ 07:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by hmmmbeer
reply to post by NewAgeMan
 


>>He knows damn well that 9/11 was a false flag pretext, but just can't say it outright.

Exactly.

Dont we all? Some of us dont fear speaking our minds of course, but RP is in a different situation.

btw hooper and goodoldave are long standing disinfo agents, just so you know


Any proof for this other than the idea that you're wrong and that anyone who points out your errors must be a "disinfo agent"?



posted on Feb, 24 2012 @ 12:32 PM
link   
This guy hooper went on another thread and said there is no conspiracy and that no one cares. I say we do either one of two things with this guy, either show him the evidence that supports the 9/11 conspiracy or ignore him.

hooper I'll direct you to two links.

1. The best 9/11 documentary to support the case is called Zero: An Investigation Into 9/11
2. Alex Jones interviews Steve Pieczenik
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

That should give you a good start. If your serious I would encourage you to view these videos with an open mind you will soon see there is much more to 9/11 than what you were told by the mainstream and official sources. The main goal here is to spread awareness and to push for a real, independent investigation and hold responsible the real perpetrators of 9/11. We have good reason to suspect it wasn't Osama Bin Laden.
edit on 24-2-2012 by RadioactiveRob because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 02:07 PM
link   
It looks to me that Ron Paul used 9/11 conspiracies to pick up alternative support for his campaign, it's an interesting tactic but I don't see him having the time to do anything with it.



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 02:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by hooper
Apparently a Super PAC that is supporting the Ron Paul campaign is operated by a conspiracy afficianado. The operator apparently doesn't limit his paranoia to only "inside job" fanatasies but also likes the "FEMA concentration camps" stuff.


So? I fail to see the problem here.

Guilt by association is nonsense.



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 10:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by imherejusttoread

Originally posted by hooper
Apparently a Super PAC that is supporting the Ron Paul campaign is operated by a conspiracy afficianado. The operator apparently doesn't limit his paranoia to only "inside job" fanatasies but also likes the "FEMA concentration camps" stuff.


So? I fail to see the problem here.

Guilt by association is nonsense.


Well, its not complete nonsense. If the association is reciprocal then there's a little more to it. I don't know that R. Paul has anything to do with this particular Super PAC but you have to ask yourself why they feel comfortable supporting that particular candidate. The same can be said of any candidate and the groups that support them.



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 10:48 AM
link   
First RP has to contend with the vote fraud commited by, for, and at the behest of, the very same people who support and PROFIT from the "official STORY (sic) of 911" .



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 11:01 AM
link   
Re "Stormfront" and the like


A white supremacist rally in Kalamazoo last summer was organized and attended by a paid FBI informant, Hal Turner, the Southern Poverty Law Center said Thursday.www.splcenter.org...

michiganmessenger.com...


we all know from Tim McV to Hal Turner the so called "white supremacists" and "neo Nazis" are state sponsered psyops....

so of course these groups would tie themselves to RP for Psyop purposes...thats what the FBI pays them to do.
( they could be investigating real crimes instead of causing them...but thats not their job.....sad innit?
some the gullible will fall for it tho



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 12:09 PM
link   
reply to post by Danbones
 



we all know from Tim McV to Hal Turner the so called "white supremacists" and "neo Nazis" are state sponsered psyops....

We do? Actually, we don't. That's your little delusion.

so of course these groups would tie themselves to RP for Psyop purposes...thats what the FBI pays them to do.

Of course, of course. Its all the FBI's fault. They're plotting to destroy the candidacy of a marginal candidate that has no chance of winning anything. Yep. That makes perfect sense.

( they could be investigating real crimes instead of causing them...but thats not their job.....sad innit?
some the gullible will fall for it tho

Yes, the gullible will fall for it.





new topics




 
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join