It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rwfresh
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
The Holographic reality is a reflection of Reality in a holographic mirror. It is not actual. Truth is not a hologram.
Do you believe that time is both infinite and definite?
The Devil is that good. And guess who he is?
Originally posted by truthseeker84
Originally posted by rwfresh
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
The Holographic reality is a reflection of Reality in a holographic mirror. It is not actual. Truth is not a hologram.
Do you believe that time is both infinite and definite?
The Devil is that good. And guess who he is?
Who?
Sean Penn?
Originally posted by rwfresh
Originally posted by truthseeker84
Originally posted by rwfresh
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
The Holographic reality is a reflection of Reality in a holographic mirror. It is not actual. Truth is not a hologram.
Do you believe that time is both infinite and definite?
The Devil is that good. And guess who he is?
Who?
Sean Penn?
In a sense.. for me! yeah! Spicoli might be more accurate.
3/2 is C to G and 2/3 is F to C.
Originally posted by rwfresh
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
The Holographic reality is a reflection of Reality in a holographic mirror. It is not actual. Truth is not a hologram.
Do you believe that time is both infinite and definite?
The Devil is that good. And guess who he is?
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
3/2 is C to G and 2/3 is F to C.
Why is F to C 2/3? Isn't it a 5th also? Do different 5ths have different ratios?
See that is exactly the contradiction I am pointing out. The Perfect Fifth has to be doubled as an octave to become a Perfect Fourth.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
See that is exactly the contradiction I am pointing out. The Perfect Fifth has to be doubled as an octave to become a Perfect Fourth.
Doesn't have to be. A P4 can be simply derived from the Octave by dividing the Octave by the P5 and vice versa.
2/1 divided by 3/2 is 4/3. 2/1 divided by 4/3 is 3/2. Simple math, no inversion doubling or divide and average, just like Snakemaster did it. 1:2:3:4 without the 7-10 split. Is bowling the symbolic destruction of the Babylonian Tetrad?
As for the Archytas Addendum, a whole tone can be derived from dividing P5 as 3/2 by P4 as4/3 to get 9/8. This can all be done without resorting to squaring, halving or cubing to the indefinite value for the square root of two. However, Freemasonry continues to subvert my attempts to produce an abacus with a USB built in.
The perfect fourth may be derived from the harmonic series as the interval between the third and fourth harmonics.
F to C is 2/3 frequency and C to G is 3/2 frequency.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
F to C is 2/3 frequency and C to G is 3/2 frequency.
Aren't F-C, C-G and G-D all P5's with 3/2 frequency?
Any who doubt that the musical ratios are all of greater inequality, i.e., that the antecedent or first term in each is greater than the consequent or second term, should consult Archytas DK 47 B 2. This Fragment requires that the ratios be of this form if the assertions about the three means [arithmetic, harmonic and geometric] are to be true. Accordingly, the ratios assigned to the octave, fifth, fourth and minor sixth, must be 2:1, 3:2, 4:3 and 8:5, and not 1:2, 2:3, 3:4 and 5:8, respectively, as Mosshammer and others would have them. Indeed, there is early proof deriving from the Pythagorean school that intervals, such as the fifths, which are represented by superparticular [n + 1 : n] ratios cannot be partitioned into any number of equal subintervals because the terms of these ratios admit no number of geometric means….There is reason to believe that these were supplied by Archytas in the early fourth century B.C.233
Although the later Pythagoreans used the ratio 9/8 for tuning it must be emphasized the Orthodox Pythagoreans did not use 9/8, not in the sense of Archytas. Why? Because the ratio 9/4, reduced to 9/8, is not of the Pythagorean Tetrad based on the “orthodox” perfect fifth “Great Dragon Tuning.” As Professor Andre Barbera exposes: Orthodox Pythagorean theory recognizes five consonances: fourth, fifth, octave, twelfth, and double octave; and these are represented by the multiple and superparticular ratios [n + 1 : n] from the tetrad. The number 8 obviously does not belong to the tetrad.235
Barbera does note that Archytas used the Babylonian tetrachord, an extension of the tetrad, 6:8::9:12 whereby 8 is the harmonic mean and 9 is the arithmetic mean between 6 and 12 with the above changed meanings as discussed.236 So 1, 4/3, 3/2, 2 were converted to 6:8:9:12. So 8 x 9 = 72 (harmonic mean x arithmetic mean = geometric mean squared) and the square root of 72 in simplified radical form is 6 times the square root of 2 – or the equal-tempered logarithmic tritone music interval, the 6th semitone of the 12 note scale aka the Devil’s Interval. In other words 9/8, the major 2nd music interval, cubed, is the square root of two as the most dissonant music interval of the Western logarithmic scale.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Then I discovered the Actual Matrix Plan conspiracy based on the same conspiracy -- corroborating my discovery -- only supporting it.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
reply to post by Jn
Talking is not practice. The practice to escape from the Matrix is the complementary opposites resonance.