Originally posted by Astyanax
or seen black triangles over your backyard that move in defiance of 'propulsion lift dynamics'.
edit on 15/2/12 by Astyanax because: of another thing.
For Schelling the way into the circular movement of the conspiracy is always what is most necessary and most difficult.
We are no more in nature then we are in time. Our life belongs to the conspiracy of nature, to the conspiracy of life itself. For seen in the right way everything is alive for Schelling.
the triadic presentation of subject and object, that is that they are never resolved into a logical identity but are held together in the disequilibrium of the conspiracy.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by ThoughtForms
Hi mary, I know u from previous incarnations, yup apparently fulllotusqigong is drew . . .
When I posted, I had not figured that out.
But after I posted, I did put two and two together, but not without raising more questions. I had thought fulllotusqigong was female after reading of taking music composition at Smith College, a women's college, but then I saw that Drew Hempel is male because an interview posted on martialdevelopment. com refers to a "he."
Also, the .pdf "The Alchemy of Rainbow Heart Music ... ," the book linked with 725 scholarly footnotes, in which fulllotusqigong talks about chapter two, saying, "I go into great detail about this," there is another name: Moose Dung. I take it this is a pseudonym or pen name? Why? (LOL I thought it was a legitimate Asian name, too.)edit on 02/14/12 by Mary Rose because: Punctuation
Originally posted by rwfresh
Hi qi, i have been reading this thread for the last few days. I was wondering if you could summarize, the main ideas/discoveries as they relate directly to the OP. With all the different ideas being explored here i think i am missing the main point.. or rather.. it's escaped me. I am genuinely interested!
“One text of the Prapanchasara Tantra says that the Parabindu divides into two parts, of which the right is Bindu, the male, Purusha or Ham, and the left Visarga the female, Prakriti or Sah, making the combined Hamsah. Hamsah is the union of Prakriti and Purusha and the universe is Hamsah” – The Garland of Letters, Sir John Woodroffe In Tantrika, a host of correspondences are made with the three Bindus; e.g., Moon, Fire, and Sun; Iccha, Jnana, and Kriya; Vama, Jyestha, and Raudri; Brahma, Vishnu, and Rudra. The three Bindus constitute symbolically the points of a triangle. “The consolidating point the yoni is the bindu within the triangle“. It is the Iccha (desire), Jnana (knowledge) and Kriya (action) of the universal Being, represented by Moon, Fire and Sun that are responsible for world creation. The Sun is technically spoken of as Kama, and the Moon and Fire together as Kala. So, the great triangle is Kamakala. The Sun, Moon and Fire which are responsible for world creation, has an important relation to our creation. Between the Sun, Moon, and Fire they form a triangle, Sun at the right nipple, the Moon in the left nipple and Fire at the Navel. The are 43 such triangles, of which with Para-Tan, as a way to attain freedom from bondage of the world while still living in it, by using 9 of the 43 triangles.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
What do you mean "exotic"?
Originally posted by Astyanax
He was a doctor of medicine who apparently had some connections with clandestine agencies of the US government.'
Puharich’s final book continued this Actual Matrix Plan as the Psi-Plasma Vortex: “Since about 63% of the human body also consists of hydrogen atoms we can look for a resonance between its protonic magnetic spin and precession systems and the protonic ELF matrix of the cosmos as a whole.”318 Reiser says the “Cosmic Lens is the Eye of God.” (CH & WU, p. 180) based on The Twelve Tone Temple (p. 212) that is The Rebuilding of Solomon's Temple (p. 131). Reiser describes this religion further: “a rich assortment of forces for Cosmon to work with as He plays His logarithmic spirals of music upon the galaxy, the solar system, the Helium Psychophere and Man.” (CH & WU, p. 184)
CIA mind control scientist Dr. Andrija Puharich also considers the music logarithmic or equal-tempered scale to be the secret for free energy technology: Within this octave, the dispersion pattern was found to correspond to small peaks which closely mimicked the equal-tempered scale….It is assumed that this dispersion is the result of phonon vibrations between the four vertices of the tetrahedron water molecule….The phonon mechanism is the direct cause for stimulating photon emission. (Elf Magnetic Model of Matter and Mind)
Originally posted by Astyanax
and there is no such thing as 'magnetic momentum'. I can go on repeating the truth for as long as you go on spinning this yarn. It's up to you.
Phys. Rev. B 75, 014428 (2007) [8 pages] Magnetic momentum density, Fermi surface, and directional magnetic Compton profiles in LaSr2Mn2O7 and La1.2Sr1.8Mn2O7
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Originally posted by UncleV
The question of the natural overtones of the harmonic series versus the complementary opposite of the Perfect Fourth/Perfect Fifth is an excellent question -- one that I have not yet addressed in detail.
The C to C octave are the first and second harmonic and the G is the third harmonic as the Perfect Fifth and then the same G to the next octave higher C is the fourth harmonic as the Perfect Fourth. So again this means that 2:3 is C to G and G to C is 3:4. Now as per the logic I have used and the questions asked -- this inversion relies on a doubling of the octave or a squaring of the value of 2 to 4. We can also see this doubling in the harmonics series so the first harmonic is 1 and the second octave harmonic is 2 and the third octave harmonic is 4 and the fourth octave harmonic is the eighth or 8th harmonic in the series and the fifth octave harmonic is the 16th harmonic in the series. So this implies that the inversion of the Perfect Fifth and Perfect Fourth as C to G and G to C, showing noncommutative logic (i.e. A x B does not equal B x A[
Originally posted by Astyanax
"Negative infinity was created by Plato"
Plato, although he was a fan of Pythagoras and well versed in the mathematics of his day, did not write any mathematical treatises that have come down to us. His thoughts on the reality or otherwise of numbers and geometrical solids (see the Republic) was certainly influential, but that was philosophy, not mathematics.
Plato certainly did not 'invent negative infinity'. If the OP denies this, I invite him to quote from the relevant passage in the works of Plato in which this invention appears. He will not find any such passage.
"the first example (of 'negative infinity') being the square root of two as the Devil's Interval the tritone."
The square root of two is not infinite. It is a real number whose value lies between 1.4142135 and 1.4142136. The OP, who boasts that (people he calls) famous mathematicians have praised his mathematics, does not even seem to know the difference between an infinite quantity and an irrational number, something older members of ATS will remember being taught in high school. That tells you how much the OP's mathematical 'insight' is worth.
"So zero is then the quadratic solution for harmonic mean times arithmetic mean equals geometric mean squared."
The square root of 2 – the length of the diagonal of a right-angled triangle whose shorter sides are both one unit long – refused to fit into this neat cosmic scheme. It was an irrational number, inexpressible as the ratio of two integers. Put another way, its decimal expansion goes on forever without ever settling into a recurring pattern. ...How could they work with things that clearly existed and went on indefinitely – a number like √2 or a curve that approached a line ever more closely – while avoiding a confrontation with infinity itself? Aristotle provided the key by arguing that there were two kinds of infinity. Actual infinity, or completed infinity, which he believed could not exist, is endlessness fully realized at some point in time. Potential infinity, which Aristotle insisted was manifest in nature – for example, in the unending cycle of the seasons or the indefinite divisibility of a piece of gold – is infinitude spread over unlimited time.
Think about this: (s rt) 2 = 1.4142135... and the integers continue on forever approaching some value but never ever reaching it. Since (sq rt) 2 will never be a number because it is in continual motion moving towards some number, it is a non-number....I think that this is where irrationals are manufactured creating the myth that the irrationals are actually numbers. They are not. They are artifacts of a flaw in long division. They are a "red herring" to use a metaphor from Sherlock Homes. They led us on a merry chase through volumes of math books. The irrationals are not in the set of real numbers. Conclusion I think Pythagoras, Euclid, Descartes, Newton, and Einstein were on target with their concept of a universe with simple, elegant, symmetrical patterns of rational numbers that decode the blueprint of nature.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Originally posted by Astyanax
and there is no such thing as 'magnetic momentum'. I can go on repeating the truth for as long as you go on spinning this yarn. It's up to you.
Phys. Rev. B 75, 014428 (2007) [8 pages] Magnetic momentum density, Fermi surface, and directional magnetic Compton profiles in LaSr2Mn2O7 and La1.2Sr1.8Mn2O7
Originally posted by ThoughtForms
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Originally posted by Astyanax
and there is no such thing as 'magnetic momentum'. I can go on repeating the truth for as long as you go on spinning this yarn. It's up to you.
Phys. Rev. B 75, 014428 (2007) [8 pages] Magnetic momentum density, Fermi surface, and directional magnetic Compton profiles in LaSr2Mn2O7 and La1.2Sr1.8Mn2O7
means nothing to no one without a source. you've provided sources for other content you've posted in 'ex' tags before, but not this time. There is no good reason for that action other then that you are a fraud. You're game is up Drew. I sincerely hope you get your comeuppance.
-TF
I find that a magnetic basis for matter, as proposed by Schwinger, is required to explain l-amino acid molecular asymmetry of life processes operation through proton magnetic asymmetry.
Originally posted by ThoughtForms
And I actually provided similar information to this thread myself in my first post which was the part about tuning or pitch shifting from 440Hz to 432Hz or the other way around and why they're different... also answering how and what...its exponential (accelerates as it moves one direction, decelerates when it moves in the opposite direction) and -31.8 cents is the difference (at least 440-432 is...)
-TFedit on 15-2-2012 by ThoughtForms because: (no reason given)edit on 15-2-2012 by ThoughtForms because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
So again my model is that science is based on left-brain and right hand asymmetry that is going against ecology that relies on left-handed asymmetric carbon-based molecules with right-brain dominance asymmetry (shamanism).
The issue of whether the frequency accelerates because it is exponential growth is an interesting question and reveals the connection between addition and multiplication
the noncommutative or complementary opposite relation of time and frequency.
fit into to this. And exactly what do you mean by that statement. Define it for me. once you explain that, we can continue with the rest of your post.
the noncommutative or complementary opposite relation of time and frequency.
so you mean as in meters/feet that the wave physically occupies?
Another way to think of this is time is the period as wavelength space
how can
and it's inversion is the frequency
the what?
but because of the quantum time-frequency uncertainty principle
if you measure frequency over a short span of time (normal is 1 second) lets say 5ms, it won't make a difference you'll just have messier Hz numbers at the end. 0.5Hz this and 33.456Hz that. Now if you're saying that a 1 second unit of time itself is shorter. Prove it and then explain its relevance. See because if we still perceive it as the same second its always been it makes jack all difference. from a "sound & music" perspective which IS the topic of this thread.
the shorter the time is the more spread out the frequency.
I want to say no but instead I'll as how would u "spread the frequency?". and spread "spatially" as in panning within the stereo image produced by your speakers which is a man made imitation of being in the front row at a rock concert? or "spread" as in something else? and actually I will say no because when the frequency goes to zero nothing happens at all. 0Hz is no sound. Silence on the other hand, is not "no sound" its just below the limits of our hearing range. -40db and down is "silence" to us, but not to other living things.
So if you want to see if time accelerates then the frequency is spread out and conversely if the frequency goes to zero then the time spreads out to infinity -- which is also the point De Broglie is making about quantum relativity.
we're talking what now? those are things but how do they sandwich knife cosmic gas flue allah? Sorry I mean those are things but how do they relate? O.K so you're talking about sound produced by conciousness, when where how why? I say no it doesn't what are you on about.
O.K. so what happens is that we're talking about the source of sound as consciousness but on a physical level this means that a quantum singularity is achieved that then reverses time to create a mini-black hole with positrons (antimatter) instead of electrons.
when did that happen? time expand? I don't recall that...
So the issue of subtracting frequencies under the condition of time-frequency uncertainty means that the logarithmic expansion of time
time as we have defined it is figured out from the movement of the planets around the sun & through our solar system and how that creates a pattern of effects here on earth we follow and describe using time which beyond the way we perceive it, is as constant as the planets. So, our conscious experience of our time here changes, but not time itself, and our awareness is one thing that comes into play in how time is perceived as modified by memories, thoughts and other distractions from the now. So frequency increases not when time changes but because the energy travels faster at the same time as it spins more. Hence exponential. and it does these things relying on time as a constant. Time is not required to change in order for sound to become light.... and so on...
causes an increase in frequency or vice versa -- this was described again with the higher harmonics resonating into ultrasound.
again with this mumbo...
because of the quantum time-frequency uncertainty -- and this creates the relativistic nonlinear feedback with the ELF waves from the subharmonic beats
means nothing to no one without a source. you've provided sources for other content you've posted in 'ex' tags before, but not this time. There is no good reason for that action other then that you are a fraud.
Puharich - if you read the link I gave -- is referring to the wavelength of the proton in relativistic motion so that it's spread out over half of the solar system.
Originally posted by LightsideAssassin
OP is trolling all of you hard. Here's my question: why are some of you so insecure with your own investigations and conclusions that you keep falling for this? He's making this # up.