It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Americanist
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
‘Living Laser’ Engineered From Human Cells
www.wired.com...
haha. Get a phone healing from qigong master Chunyi Lin and you'll feel a laser inside your body. haha.
One time I asked him what percentage my right kidney was working. He was standing in front of me. He looks at my kidney and instantly I feel this laser bliss heat burning just on my right kidney. Then he says -- oh about 70%. He can see inside peoples' bodies and he says that the book "The Holographic Universe" by Michael Talbot is an accurate description of what shamanic energy master reality is like.
I'm pretty sure I can be tapped under the right conditions. Graceful movements also work with my mind, but it's all about networking. Let me know...
Sucking Force The mechanism under considerations describes the capacity of a system to use phase information in order to store and distribute energy. This process is not passive absorbance but an active process where energy is stored by constructive interference within the system against an energy gradient of removed energy at the outside. It is evident that this leads to a force which is defined by the gradient of stored to destructed energy between the inside and the outside. This force has the opposite direction to the force of the radiation pressure of the incoming wave like that of a vacuum cleaner which moves its sucking tube towards the incoming air flow instead of getting pushed away. “ “In addition we would like to say that it is very likely that the quantum description of photon sucking in biological systems requires squeezed states since the flexibility in tuning the uncertainties of amplitude and phase of the electromagnetic field is a most powerful instrument of biological organization and communication. This could also explain why biophoton emission is limited to weak intensities, since only a few photons in the field allow the perfect application of non-classical light for communication.” Summary ….This process of photon sucking involves a force which may well explain the cell-cell attraction and/or repulsion. At the same time some unknown phenomena of phototropism and similar effects including biological rhythms may find basic understanding, since the mechanism can work also in non-linear classical optics. The organization of cells (including growth, differentiation…) and the “language” may become understandable on this basis, too. This effect can play a role not only between cells and organisms, but also within cells and between groups of biomolecules. Specific phase– and frequency modulations may provide the language of the system under consideration.”
Originally posted by Astyanax
- Phase can never be infinite in value.
- There is no such thing as 'phase amplitude'.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
On the relation of phase to amplitude in quantum physics
2:3 is in decimal form 666
Originally posted by Astyanax
The concept of repeating decimals is usually taught to children in primary school. Your educational level seems to plummet further with ever post you make.
edit on 12/2/12 by Astyanax because: of T time.
I saw a big black equilateral triangle craft fly right over our trees in my yard -- I could have hit it with a rock -- no fuselage, flying slow, making a humming noise and completely in defiance of normal propulsion lift dynamics.
...the longitude scalar waves that Tesla discovered...
...but it's also the "magnetic momentum of the proton"...
Vortex or spiral is the key of how phase turns into amplitude by reversing the frequency
These terms are basically interchangeable because of the quantum uncertainty as de Broglie's Law of Phase Harmony reveals.
Science is inherently authoritarian
Be nice so I can learn better. Please.
Originally posted by nicolet
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
If u do some research what u are referring to has ancient roots, with the trident/Poseidon. It was the church that took it's ancient meaning and changed it to represent the devil....
Originally posted by ThoughtForms
reply to post by LightsideAssassin
I also believe it is a case of energy and vibration...also that there has to be a large chunk of the puzzle of the nature of reality which is impossible for us humans to sense. we just aren't equiped. Its there, we just can't experience it with any one of our senses.....
-TFedit on 12-2-2012 by ThoughtForms because: (no reason given)edit on 12-2-2012 by ThoughtForms because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
Do you believe 5/4 is the cube root of 2? Also,
So the Perfect Fifth is 3:2 as C to G and the Perfect Fourth is G to C as 3:4 but this is noncommutative mathematics!
I can't see why you expect it to be commutative as presented. What similarity is there between Perfect Fifth and Perfect Fourth? In this example doesn't C ascend to G and then G to C an octave above the original C?
For Western symmetric logic C to G is 2:3 and G to C is 3:2.
If they're the same C and G wouldn't that be true?
The example is noncommutative because it's from F to C as 2:3x and then C to G as 3:2x but it's never stated what "x" is -- that's the "bait and switch" tactic. So then F to C is squared as 4:3x but since it's within the same octave it is actually 3:4 as G to C and C to G as 2:3.
Archytas had to use only 3:2 and 4:3 based on the double octave whereas the frequency harmonics use the octave as 1:2 and the perfect fifth as 2:3 and the perfect fourth as 3:4. This is the natural resonance harmonics instead of trying to extend a scale using logarithmics.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
Do you believe 5/4 is the cube root of 2? Also,
So the Perfect Fifth is 3:2 as C to G and the Perfect Fourth is G to C as 3:4 but this is noncommutative mathematics!
I can't see why you expect it to be commutative as presented. What similarity is there between Perfect Fifth and Perfect Fourth? In this example doesn't C ascend to G and then G to C an octave above the original C?
For Western symmetric logic C to G is 2:3 and G to C is 3:2.
If they're the same C and G wouldn't that be true?
The example is noncommutative because it's from F to C as 2:3x and then C to G as 3:2x but it's never stated what "x" is -- that's the "bait and switch" tactic. So then F to C is squared as 4:3x but since it's within the same octave it is actually 3:4 as G to C and C to G as 2:3.
Archytas had to use only 3:2 and 4:3 based on the double octave whereas the frequency harmonics use the octave as 1:2 and the perfect fifth as 2:3 and the perfect fourth as 3:4. This is the natural resonance harmonics instead of trying to extend a scale using logarithmics.
Why is F in the response which is in no way an answer to my question?
C to G, interval. Same G to higher C, different interval. C to G and back to same C is analogous to A x B = B x A.
"5/4 IS the cube root of 2". Yes or no?
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
"5/4 IS the cube root of 2". Yes or no?
The real clincher for this complementary opposites argument is Simon Stevin's 17th C. conversion of Archytas' diatonic scale into equal-tempered tuning. Stevin relied on the octave defined as a starting value of 5000 with its harmonic double as 10,000. Stevin then argues that half of the octave is the square root, or the tritone music interval, and so a third of the octave, or two major second intervals, the major third, 5/4, is therefore a cube root of two. The 12 notes of the scale are therefore based on the twelfth root of two. The cube root of two then enables the exact same continued proportion equation that Archytas used, based on my own “secret of the sect” discovery – only converted by Stevin to decimal fractions.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
"5/4 IS the cube root of 2". Yes or no?
Philosophy (1999) Volume: 74, Issue: 288 ISSN: 00318191 Abstract A popular view is that the great discovery of Pythagoras was that there are irrational numbers, e.g., the positive square root of two. Against this the article argues that mathematics and geometry, together with their applications, do not show that there are irrational numbers or compel assent to that proposition.
Originally posted by strongangelstar
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
Didn't Lyall Watson go into all this in his book "Super Nature" (Coronet: 1973). I seem to recall an item about the French Professor Gavraud, who built machines to produce infra-sound (low frequency sound). His observation led him to build a Giant "Police Whistle" powered with compressed air. Watson relates that the Technician who gave the giant whistle its first trial dropped down dead and - post mortem - was discovered to have had his internal organs mashed to an "amorphous jelly by the vibrations". Also Pyramids too have properties that suggest they are audio instruments of some sort. I recall seeing, either in the British Museum else the V&A, a statue of a Pharoah with Ears virtually Elephantine in size; and the Bible, much of it borrowed from Pharonic sources constantly reminds us to hear - listen out - for what otherwise passes by our senses unnoticed!
"Professor Gavraud is an engineer who almost gave up his post at an institute in Marseilles because he always felt ill at work. He decided against leaving when discovered that the recurrent attacks of nausea only worried him when he was in his office at the top of the building. Thinking that there must be something in the room that disturbed him, he tried to track it down with devices sensitive to various chemicals, and even with a geiger counter, but he found nothing until one day, nonplused, he leaned back against the wall. The whole room was vibrating at a very low frequency. The source of this energy turned out to be an air-conditioned plant on the roof of a building across the wy, and his office was the right shape and the right distance from the machine to resonate in sympathy with it. I was this rhythm, at seven cycles per second, that made him sick." "Fascinated by the phenomenon, Gavraud decided to build machines to produce infrasound so that he could investigate it further. In casting around for likely designs, he discovered that the whistle with a pea in it issued to all French gendarmes produced a whole range of low-frequency sounds. So he produced a police whistle six feet long and powered it with compressed air. The technician who gave the giant whistle its first trial blast fell down dead on the spot. A post-mortem revealed that all his internal organs had been mashed into an amorphous jelly by the vibrations." "Gavraud went ahead with his work more carefully and did the next test out of doors, with all observers screened from the machine in a concrete bunker. When all was ready, they turned the air on slowly - and broke the windows of every building within half a mile of the test site. Later they learned to control the amplitude of the infrasound generator more effectively and designed a series of smaller machines for experimental work. One of the most intersting discoveries to date is that the waves of low frequencu can be aimed and that two generators focused on a particular point even five miles away produce a resonance that can knock a building down as effectively as a major earthquake. These frequency-7 machines can be built very cheaply, and plans for them are available for three French francs from the Paten Office in Paris." - Supernature pp. 92-93, Coronet Books 1974.
Originally posted by Astyanax
... the statistical theories hide a completely determined and ascertainable reality behind variables which elude our experimental techniques.
Originally posted by Astyanax
However, that does not mean that phase can have infinite value. And – to repeat myself – there is no such thing as phase amplitude.
Einstein’s form of the quantum condition fitted well with de Broglie’s idea that action played the role of a phase. In his seminar Langevin called the action variables “the cyclic periods” of the action integral, and so did Leon Brillouin and Louis de Broglie. This denomination implied that Langevin regarded action as the argument of a periodic function.[1] The meaning of this is that in QM the least possible exemplification of a
dynamical quantity, E or p, can only be recorded over a period. A wave
period. If this period is expressed in terms of the frequency, ν, we obtain E=hν and so Et=h. If it is expressed in terms of the wavelength, λ, we obtain
p=h/λ and so pλ=h, as two alternative expressions of minimal action, =h.
The idea, stated in more precise terms discloses that the basic quantum
relation, E=hν or E≈ν, actually signifies that E, exactly like ν, can no longer
be defined at an instant d 0, as was classically assumed, but only over a
period t>0, whose boundary instants [t1, t2] are here given by the frequency
of this period, ν. Correspondingly, p also cannot be determined at a point
location, dq0, but only over a distance, whose boundary points [q1q2] are
given by the wavelength of this period, λ.
It is precisely because of this fact, i.e. precisely because E cannot be defined
at an instant dt0, but can only be mapped over a period, that the
resulting product of action Et is not arbitrarily reducible to a dimishing value
Et0, but can only be determined over a limiting such period and not less,
that the product Et is thereby rendered a quantum of action, h, instead.
Clearly, for the case that E could be recorded at an instant, taking this instant
as narrow we might want it to be, thereby leading to a t0, the pro-duct Et
would be a vanishing quantity and no quantum of action would result.
Einstein’s form of the quantum condition fitted well with de Broglie’s idea that action played the role of a phase.
physicists have been beating their heads to understand exactly what the Energy-Time Uncertainty (ETU) actually was.
True enough, the problems are there and I have myself listed a number of them, [5, 6, 7] but these were to a certain extent extrinsic to the principles of QM, mostly relating to the knowledge of time in general, whereas A,B’s initial point was that the ETU also had problems intrinsic to the theory. In their words “there is therefore no reason inherent in the principles of quantum theory why the energy of a system cannot be measured in as short a time as we please”. [2, p.1652].
Why is there no such thing as an Et≠tE, when there is such a thing as a pq≠qp, or why is there no operator for time, when there is one for position –which is the same exact thing-, or why is time only a parameter in QM, whereas position is an “observable”, which is the most intriguing one of all. The reason is, of course, that positions have to be observed to be known, but times not. Some would be tempted to retort that times too have to be observed, if to be known, and this is what having to rely on clocks is all about. But this is quite superficial. Clocks are not ways of observing time. Clocks are ways of keeping it. Time as such we can never ob-serve. Time, we just keep. And this is what makes all the difference. Clock indications, on the face of it, appear to be more trustworthy than our “inner sense” of time is. This, besides, is their reason of existence. As a rule, yes; but not always and not when it counts. For clock indications are trusted, provided they do not conflict with our inner sense of time. Whenever they do, it is not clocks but our inner sense which takes over.
The force generated by a fieldless potential is only exerted through the wavelength and it may be considered as an inertial force, just as may be considered, in general, the forces due to the de Broglie wave which are at the origin of diffraction and interference phenomena. De Broglie drew attention, starting from his first notes1, on the fact that the diffraction of material particles violates the Galileo principle of inertia, because particles are deviated from their inertial motion in the absence of external forces and without colliding with any obstacle (unless the wave exerts a pressure on matter). The existence of the wave forces a more general expression of the inertia principle, the old expression of which remains approximately true when the diffraction effects are negligible.
The velocity of the electrons is not the phase velocity V (which besides is greater than the velocity of light)
The potential A appears only in the second factor: in the phase of the wave. The amplitude slowly oscillates with a frequency dn and propagates with the velocity ¶n ¶ mv h equal to the group velocity of the free particle: the velocity v....But
we shall see that the propagation of energy is indirectly influenced by the potential
through the phase propagation (just as in crystal optics it is influenced by the
polarization of the medium).
Although our two observers, (one stationary, the other with the particle), disagree about the inherent quantum frequency of the phase wave and the relativistic frequency of the particle, they nonetheless can agree that there is a moving point in space where the two frequencies always remain in phase