Originally posted by lynn112
Did it bother you when NY state tax dollars were used to pay for the dem primaries and repubs couldn't vote? How about residents of the state who are
not registered to either party, they don't get to vote in any of the primaries?
Point is, it's part of the process and gives the state members of the respectve party a voice in who represents their party in the next election.
That is not an issue IMO.
Besides, what valid reason would a registered member of the opposite party have for voting in a primary other than to vote for a canidate who they
think wouldn't beat their own canidate?
I am not a Dem vs Repub American. I could care less what either party did.
I am all for getting rid of this two-party popularity contest altogether...
When you say, "Did it bother you when NY state tax dollars were used to pay for the dem primaries and repubs couldn't vote? How about residents of
the state who are not registered to either party, they don't get to vote in any of the primaries?"
HELL YES it bothers me.
Why should an Independent pay for a Republican, or a Dem pay for an Independent?
Why the hell should I, someone that doesn't support ANY party, have to pay for ANY of them?
NO, it ISN'T "just part of the process"... nothing in the Constitution says anything about a primary, and actually, doesn't say any about
political parties in general.
Now stop acting condescending...