It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by UnaChispa
Originally posted by Knights
It is part of a standard tour of duty.
Prince William is doing his part. The Falklands proves invaluable training.
They are UK residents (many of which have been interviewed recently stressing their desire to remain part of the UK). A military presence should hopefully deter a repeat of 1982.
Simple as.edit on 8-2-2012 by Knights because: (no reason given)
If they want to be UK residents so bad, they can catch the next boat to England. The UK or any other country has no business establishing a territory thousands of miles away. That is colonization at its worst. Imperialism is the cancer of the world.
Originally posted by davesmart
Originally posted by UnaChispa
reply to post by davesmart
Let me check my facts real quick....
The UK planted a flag on a piece of the Western Hemisphere a few hundred years ago, making it British territory. Is that how you understand it?
hi sir
i do have a little bit more understanding than that
but it still comes down to 1 thing
the people of the falklands want to stay part of the british isles
sorry if i was rude
Originally posted by UnaChispa
I'm sure Her Majesty wouldn't want a piece of Greenland being controlled by the Argentine government. It is too close to home and makes the mainland uncomfortable. The Golden rule must apply to everybody.
Originally posted by GLaDOS
I'm British and I believe we should give it back to Argentina. We stole it from them. Our empire has ended, and we need to end our imperialism as well.
Originally posted by alldaylong
Originally posted by UnaChispa
Originally posted by Knights
It is part of a standard tour of duty.
Prince William is doing his part. The Falklands proves invaluable training.
They are UK residents (many of which have been interviewed recently stressing their desire to remain part of the UK). A military presence should hopefully deter a repeat of 1982.
Simple as.edit on 8-2-2012 by Knights because: (no reason given)
If they want to be UK residents so bad, they can catch the next boat to England. The UK or any other country has no business establishing a territory thousands of miles away. That is colonization at its worst. Imperialism is the cancer of the world.
If you are a citizen of Australia, Canada, New Zealand ,USA, South America, etc you are a "Product" of colonialism, and therfore a hypocrite. If you are not from a former British, Spanish, French Dutch etc colony then i appologise for calling you a hypocrite. So where are you from?
Originally posted by Kolya
reply to post by UnaChispa
Is it? If that's actually true, then uprooting a few thousand people and upto 300-year-old families so two continents (you did say 'Americas' plural) can sleep better at night is what's needed? And no one in 'the Americas' fussed about Belize, Guyana, or *everything north of Mexico* - just the Falklands?
Originally posted by Maxmars
As a person who is marginally familiar with the history of the area I have a question to ask regarding the Falkands (or "Islas Malvinas" as the locals seem to say.)
In all the interviews and other material which is broadcast in Europe, are there ever any that show residents of the islands that don't want to be subjects of the Queen?
I only ask because it seems fairly commonplace for governments to tell "the whole truth - as we want it understood" when it comes to these things... few are innocent of the practice.
Now I know that there is pride and other ego-related currency at stake here, so don't take this as an assault on your declarations. It is a legitimate question, because the "British" status of the Islands was only formalized in 1983. Unless most of it's residents (3 or 4,000 I think) are immigrants from Europe, I fail to see how aside from military power, the UK maintains the "hearts and minds" of the residents there.
Is this all about Oil?
edit on 8-2-2012 by Maxmars because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by UnaChispa
I don't WANT the people uprooted from Malvinas.
I just want to expel the British government from the Western Hemisphere.
Originally posted by Kolya
For Britain I think it's solely the Islanders; some might say it's about the natural gas and/or oil recently speculated to be offshore but how could we go to war 30 years ago on something we didn't know existed? I think it much more plausible that the government keeps its hand in this issue because there are too many 'British' involved; unlike Hong Kong, there's no 'native' population to hand over to, and also unlike Hong Kong there's little or no encouragement that the 'British' would be allowed to carry on life as normal once the land officially became someone else's concern.
Originally posted by ChrisF231
reply to post by UnaChispa
Well how would you like it if one day Mexico demanded we (the US) return California to them? I bet you wouldent be so thrilled either. Afterall we stole California from Mexico you know ...
You rant and rave against imperialism but then support it in the next breath. The Argentine claim is also imperialism.edit on 8-2-2012 by ChrisF231 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Kolya
1) Britain only has four nuclear-armed submarines, so for there to be subs plural that means sending at least 50% of its nuclear force to 'Argentina' - would it bother?