I'm suspicious. Espcialy since micheal cohens name comes up because he has a habit of promoting hoaxes on his YouTube channel

Originally posted by interupt42

It looks like a bear to me as well and that could also explain why the cameraman didn't get any closer. Who knows if it was even really filmed in Russia?

edit on 8-2-2012 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)

Yes, probably filmed at some mountain river in India or Burma. Somebody got hands on the vid, and said, let's say it was shot in Siberia!

as previously mentioned, the source of the story has been around for quite a while and his reputation should be taken into consideration here.

The comedic aspect of The Sun sourcing Mr. Cohen made reading the article all the more enjoyable

C.G.I
the right hind leg, water turbulance ,does not fit, a correct ,
pattern, of forward water flow,
and seems too ,lag behind,, the what seamingly ,should be,
an natural flow of ,,turbulence.
naturally speaking of course.

Or it got loose from Volstock.
lol

..
Land of The Lost,,,,can someone do a "Peter Griffin"@ land of the lost , utube thing?
u know for effect.
Lol.

Me..
oh ya hoax bin.

The Sun says great big tusks visible, not in that sample video are they. It looks just as the first poster suggestion, a bear with a fish, I dare to add a smallish bear.

The head is way too big to be a bear. could be a baby mammoth.

It's a bear with a fish in its mouth. The bear is bear coloured the fish is fish coloured!

Has anyone mentioned that it looks like a blurry video of a large bear with a big fish in it's mouth?

2nd.

And so they have.

Well, one more vote for bear then.

X.

Indeed its a bear with a fish in its mouth.

They haven't brought the woolly mammoth back to life to just yet.

Okay then, it's a fish with a bear in its mouth.

Or a Snuffleupagus...





...either a bear or a snuffleupagus. I can't decide.

X.

This is a bear.

Mammoth were very social animals that lived in herds, very similar to elephants. Where you see one in the wild, you'll always see others.
One mammoth? No. It's a bear.

I wish it was a woolly mammoth! But the 'tusks' are totally wrong. As already suggested, it's probably a bear.

Looks like the Loch Ness Monster carrying Bigfoot to me.