This report sounds as deluded as one from British MP's a week or so ago, where they stated that white right wing groups were more of a danger than Islamic terror groups. Even though all recent terror attacks and plots on the mainland of the UK for some years now have come from Islamic groups...

Islam really is not that big a problem. A lot of people (particularly Christians, I've noticed) make out that it is, but most of said claims are hysteria.

I am not claiming to be anything close to an expert, but a basic level of knowledge of Islamic theology will really help, here. Mohammed says that every nationality or civilisation on the planet gets sent its' own warners, (prophets) who basically outline to them what God's message for them is, relative to their own context. The Constitution of Medina guaranteed worship of God to all groups present at the time, as well.

So what this means is, that any Muslim who thinks that he has the right to kill anybody, simply because they are of a different religious system, is in fact a heretic according to his own professed theology. Muslims do not have a theological right to destroy the places of worship of other religions, or to murder other religions' adherents, unless it is in genuine self-defense. If you hear any Muslim advocating such, look up the relevant Qu'ranic verses, and then call them on it.

Originally posted by solidshot
This report sounds as deluded as one from British MP's a week or so ago, where they stated that white right wing groups were more of a danger than Islamic terror groups. Even though all recent terror attacks and plots on the mainland of the UK for some years now have come from Islamic groups...

Pretty sure the focus of the study was ethnicity.

The report also found that no single ethnic group predominated among Muslims charged in terrorism cases last year — six were of Arab ancestry, five were white, three were African-American and two were Iranian, Mr. Kurzman said. That pattern of ethnic diversity has held for those arrested since Sept. 11, 2001,

But I think its also saying that if you are worried about muslim extremists you are being a little hysterical. Do you worry about dog poo?

No, but we are! Anyone in favor of the gold standard, Ron Paul, the Constitution of the United States, or the Right to carry a firearm. We are enemies of the state.

I had a post couple days ago, went like this:

Last Year USA

1 People killed by Dog bites 200

2 People killed by lightning 35

3 People killed by Terrorism 11 (domestic)

I think we should be spending the 800 billion budget on a War With Dogs.

Originally posted by petrus4
Muslims do not have a theological right to destroy the places of worship of other religions, or to murder other religions' adherents, unless it is in genuine self-defense.

Here lies the flaw, here lies room for interpretation.

Originally posted by gosseyn

Originally posted by petrus4
Muslims do not have a theological right to destroy the places of worship of other religions, or to murder other religions' adherents, unless it is in genuine self-defense.

Here lies the flaw, here lies room for interpretation.

No moreso than with the non-Islamic crowd who will try and tell you that WW2 was justified, on the same basis. Although you're right; people do at times try to establish false pretext. You will generally find, however, that anybody who does that, was part of the world domination demographic to begin with.