I provide a synthesis of views pertaining to the thread “The Laws of Our Creator” found here.
First, I want to thank the diverse views that have contributed to this topic. Without the diversity, there most likely would not be the motion of
discussion and eventual expansion of awareness.
Thread Creator Starchild23, Creator, according to your conceptualization, needs more clarification. From what you have conceptualized so far in your
lifespan, can you clarify the following aspects? What is the spatial geographic context in which these laws or miracles whatever occurred?
For example, I am questioning the scale. Biblical stories published as children’s stories will have transferred the idea through illustrations in
young absorbing minds, that the Creator is an entity that can be conceptualized as an old bearded man inhabiting another dimension reminiscent of the
one shown in the new Thor movie.
Furthermore, this old bearded man created the Earth and walked with the first sapient ape, Adam. The Biblical stories, in essence, have reduced the
scale to a creation story of our Earth.
So what is the nature of our Creator?
Is it spirit or is it matter?
What is our relationship to what people have called spirit?
What is our relationship to matter (basically everything we can observe and instrumentally sense)?
What is the relationship between laws (miracles, processes, rhythms, relationship between relationships, or whatever) and matter?
What if we read between the lines of what we see?
What if, soon, we will have the technology to actually measure between the lines of what we see?
BeforeTheHangmansNoose conceptualizes Creator as the whole universe, or perhaps this could be conceptualized as the omniverse (given the number of
hypotheses and theories derived from mathematics)?
In other words, the Creator is the Omniverse. Could you possibly be conceptualizing the Omniverse as a clockwork containing other clockworks such as
However, Starchild23, has brought to question his purpose. How should we come to this awareness? Well how did the sapient apes do it in the past?
We have archaeological material recording their relationship with each other and all other matter, but how difficult is it in understanding these
How difficult is it to understand our relationship with each other and all now?
Starchild23 need not worry because there are many concepts that have arisen through Eco diversity to choose from and help him guide his way.
Among such views, there is midicon’s. This person simply states that you have no purpose.
Could it be that purposes are defined by relationships?
charles1952 is not understanding the spatial geographic context that Starchild23 has conceptualized.
Maybe I can be of some service, or maybe not. I’m just a person transferring information received from another unit after all. Well from what I’ve
received from the cloud of relationships surrounding me, a single context has been dichotomized (separated in 2). Is this the true nature of knowledge
and awareness? (think tree of knowledge of good and evil, to know that there exists the notion of “better” and “worse”). Could it be that the
spatial context is expanded to and limited to a plane of light and dark, brightness and the void?
charles1952 conceptualization of the Creator’s nature ascribes this entity as being omnipresent, that is “Present everywhere simultaneously.”
The usage of this term suggests that the Creator resides in all of the material and non-material here, then and then, in a continuum.
MrDesolate suggests a dichotomy of the concepts of “religion” and “science.” This cyberspace node even provides scripture supporting this
claim. The scripture which is quoted, however, interprets the material conceptualized as the sapient ape as lacking in spiritual intelligence, or what
may be called, a relationship with everything in existence. I do not know if this is true or not. It could be both. I don’t know. The relationship
between MrDesolate’s dichotomization and the scripture can be inferred that natural man is a product of science and the Spirit of God is a product
This raises the question, what was the rhythm and intention of the first religion? Was it driven at first by communication, harmonics, and chants that
served the purpose of solidifying the relationship between the matter surrounding the sapient ape’s cloud of awareness?
occrest provides the traditional interpretive view of ancient cultural text with fortunate references to scripture provided. Thank you for providing
more scriptures. This is certainly helpful in determining from what relationships you derived your information input and output from.
edit on 7-2-2012 by voicefromtheages because: addition of link