Gulf Of Mexico Impact Site?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 7-2-2012 @ 02:42 PM by redzareptile
reply to post by omegacorps


Really cool images and your "paint job" is ok too....

Do you have a point though? Not to be rude. But you probably should set this thread in a direction. I would love to hear your opinion as to the significance of the images.

Love
Red



reply posted on 7-2-2012 @ 03:11 PM by chr0naut
reply to post by omegacorps



Your theory is absolutely valid as far as I can see.

The only question I would raise relates to the size of the impact. It seems to me that the Gulf may have preexisted the impact, and the impact only affected the top of the peninsula.

But the water flows and shape of the cratering do support your thesis.

Good work.


reply posted on 7-2-2012 @ 05:17 PM by karen61057
reply to post by omegacorps



I actually live inside the rim of an ancient impact crater at the mouth of the Chesapeake bay.

I live near the little dot that shows Langley /NASA .
I just learned of this impact crater during this past year.


en.wikipedia.org...


reply posted on 7-2-2012 @ 05:38 PM by chr0naut
reply to post by omegacorps



If the asteroid was of sufficient mass or had sufficient momentum, it would not be trapped in the crust but would have penetrated well below it.

If such were the case, perhaps the peninsula did not exist prior to the impact but was uplifted as the asteroid ploughed-in?


reply posted on 7-2-2012 @ 07:21 PM by omegacorps
reply to post by chr0naut



yeah i was thinking the same thing. the yucatan is hard rock. many bedrock caves. im thinking it first impact had gotten smashed up against it and whipped the top of it off to make the second smaller impact site im thinking the asteroid was more like pumice insted of a solid iron, gold, or lead.



reply posted on 7-2-2012 @ 10:19 PM by omegacorps
reply to post by Nyiah




thank you much. like i said it's just in my head so i looked where i could and then asked the masses.

more things to come.
edit on 7-2-2012 by omegacorps because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 7-2-2012 @ 11:47 PM by omegacorps
im not so sure the small impact was the " big one " of its time.

en.wikipedia.org...

and this one has stood the test of time, but Chicxulub crater did not?

en.wikipedia.org...

you can see the rendition and it has a shock wave directing to the south/south east. and the wave dose not represent a solid impact you can see it pushed a bit. and the gravity anomaly i would think since there is no wide crater that it was pushed between the crust layers and shows up under there. could be a large gulf ( butterfly ) impact or a " double impact " the link dose not tell the angle but you can see in the rendition that bad boy left a long wake behind it. what shows up on land because of a cavitation up lift ( hence the yucatan caverns ) then it settled.

just clear your mind an picture a massive asteroid ripping toward the gulf the massive pressure wave around it pressing down on the american plains. it smashes in to the gulf ( preexisting gulf ) logging it self in the crust.
i would bet my eleventh toe that Chicxulub crater was not the the killer. shoot an air soft at a melon and watch it make a tectonic plate that the earth must deal with.

it is not natural.

i would love to take soil samples. im trying to fund that.


reply posted on 8-2-2012 @ 12:08 AM by omegacorps
reply to post by ANNED



there is traces of falling matter from this impact around the world. all im saying is they are looking where the " mass " of the left over meteorite is whats showing up under Chicxulub crater. its like getting a grape to be thrown in to a cake and it hitting that nice middle frosting layer. it hit the soft water table and kept going and the heat pressed through along with the in flow of water to make the massive caves in the area. this would lead the mayans to be drawn to that sole water source. and there interested in the under world.

please look at the big picture

maybe the stellar object was shaped like a pyramid?


reply posted on 8-2-2012 @ 03:40 PM by omegacorps
reply to post by rebellender



that might be what made new orleans. see as it is still working its way to get above sea level


reply posted on 12-2-2012 @ 02:47 AM by Nyiah
Originally posted by omegacorps
reply to
post by rebellender



that might be what made new orleans. see as it is still working its way to get above sea level

Not exactly. New Orleans is sinking, not attempting to rise. Humans draining the wetlands & walling it off with levees, creating subsidence in a soup bowl, is the root cause of why NOLA is the way it is.
NOLA.gov info
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



An unusual tree called Jaboticaba
  Posted 8 days ago with 77 member flags
Haunting pics of abandoned cities around the world
  Posted 4 days ago with 63 member flags
The Mysterious Socotra Island (Must See!)
  Posted 2 days ago with 63 member flags
Strange Sounds (UK) published on youtube on 5/13/2012
  Posted 17 days ago with 53 member flags
Pole Shift Data You Shouldn\'t Ignore
  Posted 14 days ago with 46 member flags