It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Obama has been an outspoken critic of current campaign financing laws, in particular a Supreme Court ruling that allowed the creation of super PACs. Until now he has kept his distance from Priorities USA Action.
But in the wake of the group's anemic fundraising, made public last week, the campaign decided to change its position, and announced the new stance to members of its national finance committee Monday evening.
Two Obama campaign aides confirmed that senior campaign and administration officials who participate at fundraising events for the president's campaign will also appear at events for Priorities USA Action, the PAC supporting Obama.
Messina was careful to point out the president's opposition to a Supreme Court ruling that sparked the onset of super PACs, noting [color=gold]the administration was still looking for ways to put limits on campaign spending.
"The President opposed the Citizens United decision," Messina wrote. "He understood that with the dramatic growth in opportunities to raise and spend unlimited special-interest money, [color=gold]we would see new strategies to hide it from public view.
President Obama once called 'super' political action committees — which can raise and spend unlimited amounts of cash to influence elections — a 'threat to our democracy.' Now, his re-election campaign is asking its wealthiest fund-raisers to start helping him cash in.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Another story -
Super PAC Man
President Obama once called 'super' political action committees — which can raise and spend unlimited amounts of cash to influence elections — a 'threat to our democracy.' Now, his re-election campaign is asking its wealthiest fund-raisers to start helping him cash in.
What a surprise. NOT!
Reminds me of his 'no lobbiest will find a job in my administration' - and now it's full of them.
Originally posted by sealing
How come y'all don't bring that up when you talk about
super PAC's ?
Originally posted by WTFover
Originally posted by sealing
How come y'all don't bring that up when you talk about
super PAC's ?
Um... Because the point is he said he was opposed to them, but now embraces them. Why didn't you talk about that?
The fact remains, none of this would matter if the voters would actually educate themselves on the issues and candidates, rather than rely solely on the media and advertising, which these PACs fund.