NTTR/Groom scanner audio Jan 2012, page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 7-2-2012 @ 10:42 AM by darksidius
reply to post by gariac

What do you mean by something unique, a new type of aircraft? or a new tye of engine


reply posted on 7-2-2012 @ 06:06 PM by gariac
reply to post by weavty1



In any type of analysis, you always need baseline knowledge so that you can spot the odd events. You can listen to some Red Flag audio here:
www.lazygranch.com...
to get a feeling of what normally happens on a training range. [The art of deception is to disguise your comms in the form of normal communications. ;-) ] Without baseline knowledge, you might mistake a Janet on approach for a hovering flying saucer.

Groom tests usually mention grids. Of course SAR would be grid based too.

Some of the wisdom of locating Area 51 in the middle of an air force training range is the presence of aircraft isn't exactly noteworthy. It is part of the "hiding in plane site" mentality. The base walks the line carefully in this respect. For instance, a decision was made that the security forces seen by the public would be those friendly camo dudes rather than JSOC trained ninjas.

It looks like this person found the elusive Groom Lake ground frequency, or I gave it out to too many people and somebody got waterboarded. ;-) The reports about fuel are from the Janet's heading to Groom.

Back to the altitude changes, it is possible they are doing dynamic RCS tests. That is, having the plane change altitude and then seeing if the change in position of control surfaces effects the radar cross section.

I will try to locate it later, but the same person that uploaded this audio also uploaded some Groom audio where they were dropping those radar calibration balls. IIRC, the aircraft dropping the balls used the callsign ITCHY, which once again proves these guys have a great sense of humor.



The base places some of the calibration targets around the range to make it easier for the helicopter patrol to see the border.


reply posted on 8-2-2012 @ 02:49 AM by darksidius
reply to post by weavty1



What we are sure, is with the new building at the south of the base there is something going on, and sure a new type of plane in testing.


reply posted on 9-2-2012 @ 01:07 AM by weavty1
reply to post by darksidius



I thought that new hangar is for performing minor service and maintenance on the Janet/EG&G fixed-wings?


reply posted on 16-2-2012 @ 10:58 AM by weavty1
www.lockheedmartin.com...

I think this could possibly relate to my original post, regarding avionics testing


reply posted on 18-2-2012 @ 03:38 AM by gariac
reply to post by weavty1



I think Lockheed could do that kind of testing at Edwards. If you hang out there and watch the base, you often see quite ordinary planes flying with chase aircraft. I'm sure Edwards does the minor tweaks. I watched a C17 with chase and was thinking what could they possibly be doing to an established cargo plane?

There was a press release a day or two ago explaining the Edwards aircraft participation at Red Flag was to test a new "tape." I gather tape is some arcane expression the DoD uses for software.

www.edwards.af.mil...

I parked on the north side of Edwards one morning and caught three in-flight emergencies in about 3 hours. The place is quite busy.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



JANET FLIGHTS now Trackable on PlaneFinder
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags
Most of NTTR Blacked Out in GE for 9/11/2010
  Posted 16 days ago with 3 member flags
Janet WWW278 flights over the range
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags
wHat is this? what they do earth soil?? area 51 google earth
  Posted 10 days ago with 2 member flags
N8300T odd NV65 flgiht
  Posted 7 days ago with 2 member flags
any one know what Autec is?
  Posted 5 days ago with 2 member flags
Edwards F22 crash site...then and now
  Posted 13 days ago with 1 member flags
Groom Lake Site II and Site I
  Posted 11 days ago with 1 member flags