Flag burners and unregistered protestors, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 16-9-2004 @ 10:11 PM by Jazzerman
I would expect most people that burn flags are not doing so to dishonor military men that fought and died for it, but rather to make a statement about the people that sent them to war. Surely some of you don't think the act is meant to be disrespectful? If the government was not so screwed up, filled with scandals, etc. (and doing its job right) then people would not be forced to show their emotions through flag burning.

Also, if flag burning is ever banned, it would only be fair to also ban anyone from displaying the Confederate flag. That flag goes againt the Union and modern America, so why is it not banned? Its quite funny that people that hate flag burning are much of the same people that proudly display that un-American Confederate flag on their Bumper or window. Seems a little hypocritical to me...

Flag burning IS in effect telling the government something to the effect of "Hey, wake up! We are not going to stand for how you are treating us." So, is it the fault of the person wanting to speak up and try and take back their country, or the fault of an uncaring government?

What is more un-American...proudly displaying the Confederate flag, which held on to old values of inhumanity and prejudice? Or, burning the American flag to show your displeasure with the current system? I don't know about the rest of you, but the first one clearly wins that debate.

On a side note, and this is purely my opinion...IT'S A PIECE OF CLOTH PEOPLE! I fail to see why people get so worked up over a SYMBOL, when we should be caring more about REAL issues that affect us today. This is one of the problems of our society...we care to much about petty things like this instead of devoting our time to focus on real issues. This goes for both the flag burners and the one's trying to say what they do is wrong...cut out the symbolism and idiosyncrasies of life and just state what you really think. Maybe this way things would actually get resolved instead of jumping around the issues. Ok, I said my piece...Rant over


reply posted on 16-9-2004 @ 11:03 PM by GradyPhilpott
Originally posted by oppodeldoc
I see you have a Purple Heart yourself, and wonder how you feel about the Bush Administration supporting something like that.


I'm not sure the Bush administration had anything to do with that gesture. I rather doubt it, as the administration has stayed out of the veteran status melee and have said nothing but good things about Kerry's service.

If the bandaids had borne an image of the Purple Heart award, it would have been indefensible. As it was, it was in a league with most political jabs taken at opponents during the campaigns. Only Kerry has to live with the manner in which his medals were awarded.

In my units, Purple Hearts would not have been awarded for the wounds he received. I had to wait until I got back to the States and Headquarters Marine Corps verified the circumstances under which I was wounded before my medal was forthcoming. My hospital transfers and convalescence might have slowed things down, as I was informed when I was in Japan that I would be receiving the award.

However, I had to take the initiative to follow up on the award and authorization came from the Commandant himself. These things are not taken lightly in the Corps.

"Saturday Night Live" made light of Robert Dole's Purple Heart, portraying him as wearing a full size ribbon on his lapel rather than a lapel pin. I would rather not see these things, but they happen.

These are certainly not in a league with the efforts to besmirch GWs service, which was honorable if not distinguished. Certainly, my own service was undistiguished.



[edit on 04/9/16 by GradyPhilpott]


reply posted on 16-9-2004 @ 11:08 PM by Jazzerman
Originally posted by Intelearthling
Let's don't get started on the Confederate flag. It's just as big a part of American history as the Stars and Stripes! There is nothing wrong with displaying the Conferate flag, but that's not what this thread's about , now is it!

Hey, you got that all wrong. The reason that the Confederate flag ever came into existance, was the Federal Government prohibiting states to tend to their own affairs! The whole thing (the Civil War) boils down to the rights of each state! Nothing more!


Ok, first off don't fool yourself into believing in the whole "poor southern states and their fight for states rights." No matter what you believe the Civil War started over slavery, and yes, states rights were a key issue. However, it was over the states rights to own slaves. Now, how should that be considered right? You can skirt around the issue all you want, but history clearly records that slavery was the main issue. Therefore, that Confederate flag that you say should be a part of American history is nothing more than a symbol of slavery and hatred.

I knew that you would stick up for the Confederate flag, saying that its "a part of history", because many of the same people that hate flag burning with a passion, are the same people that will stick up for the Confederacy. Again, don't fool yourself...the Southern states were going to run out of workers in the cotton fields if the Union decided to do away with slavery. The south believed they had unfair representation. The southern states complained of the northern states and the federal failure to return fugitive slaves. Southern states such as what Mississippi said in 1861 prove just that, "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery — the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization."

Dancing around this is not going to help you win. Whether you want to admit it or not the Civil War was about Human Rights and slavery, and had little to do with state rights. What are you claiming? That the northern states simply turn a blind eye to the cruel mistreatment that was going on just because it was the "states rights". That Confederate flag stands for everything THEY stood for, and what they stood for is NOT what my America stands for. So, I say to you again...a comparison between flag burning and the showing of the Confederate flag is prudent.

So, are you saying that by showing a Confederate flag you are somehow "showing us an historical symbol?" A symbol that represents all that America is supposed to stand against? Are you telling me that by displaying this you consider yourself pro-America, when in fact that flag is anti-American? How can this be...

Either you love America and all that it stands for or you hate America and all that it stands for. If America stands for abolishing slavery, and you show that Confederate flag, are you not in fact saying you agree with slavery? Would that not be anti-American?

[edit on 16-9-2004 by Jazzerman]


reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 07:45 AM by Jazzerman
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Oh, and your understanding of the War of Northern Aggression is so wrong that it can only be the result of the revisitionist marxist who now rule the US educational system. You should spend some time actually getting an education rather that completing the requirements for your diploma.
[edit on 04/9/16 by GradyPhilpott]


Grady, I take no stock in what you say anymore. There has been more than one instance where you tell people that you are wrong, and then you tell them that they are Marxist. Other people could attest to this as well. Who do you think you are fooling?

Also, you seem to be the one that blindly follows what he is told, and to a lesser extent what he is to believe. You need to accept the fact that the Civil War was fought about slavery, and both you and intelearthling can call me a Revisionist all you want, but it does not levy the fact that it was fought for that reason. Perhaps you are one of the people that believe what standard textbooks will have you believe, and thats fine if you feel like getting your education in such a manner. As you have clearly demonstrated throughout your postings you are the one that believes everything he is told. Also, what is wrong with revisionism? Its a key element in historical research and a key element to purely understanding and "revising" history so that one can find the truth. If you cannot see that then I really do feel sorry that you hold on to your "old" way of thinking...ie believing that the South were "victims", etc.

PS- You say you feel sad for people that take no stock in symbolism...well, I feel sad for people that take symbolism to heart and let it eat at their soul day in and day out, as it appears to do to you. I can't change the way you are, and I really don't care to.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 12 days ago with 59 member flags
The CIA in Australia: America\'s Foreign Watergate
  Posted 2 days ago with 19 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 12 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 10 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 11 days ago with 10 member flags