Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Talks Constitution, Claims S.Afica's Constitution Better, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 11-2-2012 @ 12:18 PM by ownbestenemy
Originally posted by Drew99GT
If we would have followed it, there would be no useless debate about abortion, about gay rights, about any human rights, about the war on drugs, about slavery and minority rights, or about the ever growing police state we find ourselves in in the United States.


That is a strong conviction you have but such conversations would have still be had. Maybe not in a charged political sense as they became or are being utilized; but they would have been discussed and should be discussed. Though not in the capacity they are now. Those issues, in my opinion, should be State and municipality levels -- with exception of slavery.

That needed a culture change and while I do not condone the forceful hand of Government to impose social changes -- it needed to step in to defend and support the Constitution and all the founding principles and ideals found within the Decelaration of Independence.

It gives us the ULTIMATE and ONLY human right: the pursuit of happiness and that all men are created equal. As long as your actions do not infringe on others, the constitution says you can do what you want to do.


This is the largest reason I have decided to follow this thread. To help educate and change the narrative that the Constitution gives us anything. It doesn't; except the reasonable understanding that Government will operate within the specific and enumerated powers and that all Political Power is retained by the People. The Constitution gives us no Rights that we did not already have!

Specifically you pointed out two "rights" -- "the pursuit of happiness and that all men are created equal". While I agree that is our ultimate understanding of Freedom and Liberty -- they are not what the Constitution "gave" nor accomplishes. The Constitution is a document that is directed inwards towards itself. That being Government itself.

This of course is not to discredit the Declaration of Independence nor the deep connection that I would continue to wager is retained by a large portion of society; nor to discredit what you were trying to convey. Merely ensuring that people educate themselves and continue the dialog and debate that has been developing since 1770s.
edit on 11-2-2012 by ownbestenemy because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 12-2-2012 @ 02:50 AM by korathin
reply to post by Destinyone



You have to look at Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg only a little closer to understand why she likes S. Africa's Constitution.

1) Ginsburg has long used foreign law's to "shape US law's in Judicial opinions"

2) Ginsburg is a Radical Leftist Feminist

3) S. Africa's Constitution allows for taxation based upon race(Feminist's have long wanted special "man taxes" and leftist's in general would love to see crippling "White Taxes")

When you sum it all up Ginsburg isn't just a traitor, but a radical bigot as well.

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul is NOT dropping out, the Mainstream Media is LYING.
  Posted 15 days ago with 111 member flags
Report: Romney Will Be Disqualified From Race Due To Fraud
  Posted 19 days ago with 105 member flags
Evidence of Vote Flipping in GOP Primary Elections
  Posted 7 days ago with 88 member flags
Fox News Analyst: First American to shoot down drone will be a hero
  Posted 14 days ago with 68 member flags
Mitt Romney scared Ron Paul is winning!!!
  Posted 7 days ago with 62 member flags
Let\'s just say it: Political Parties are the Problem
  Posted 12 days ago with 60 member flags