The secrets hidden in the pyramids. A real eye opener! , page 20
reply posted on 22-2-2012 @ 08:54 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by 8311-XHT
I'm asking for you to prove what you think. I've seen enough internet videos to know that they are not worth my time 90% of the time. If you get off on cheap tricks that's great. Speak your own and stop resorting to others to tell a tale.
I'm asking for you to prove what you think. I've seen enough internet videos to know that they are not worth my time 90% of the time. If you get off on cheap tricks that's great. Speak your own and stop resorting to others to tell a tale.
reply posted on 22-2-2012 @ 08:59 PM by Pigraphia
reply to post by Gorman91
The one he points out doesn't make outrageous claims though.
It simply asks tons of questions and points out tons of "coincidences".
Honestly I'm on the fence about the veracity of the "coincidences" pointed out in the video but it's worth watching.
The one he points out doesn't make outrageous claims though.
It simply asks tons of questions and points out tons of "coincidences".
Honestly I'm on the fence about the veracity of the "coincidences" pointed out in the video but it's worth watching.
reply posted on 22-2-2012 @ 10:19 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by Pigraphia
If you base your design off the stars gravity, the sun, and the golden ratio, you will have many coincidences.
If you base your design off the stars gravity, the sun, and the golden ratio, you will have many coincidences.
reply posted on 23-2-2012 @ 08:34 AM by Pigraphia
reply to post by Gorman91
The point the video makes is they couldn't know some of the things required for the coincidence.
All the coincidences line up in the metric system, but not the cubit system.
You really shouldn't be so dismissive of something you at least haven't heard out.
Like I said I'm on the fence about some of the stuff in the video, but it's at least worth watching in it's entirety even through the repetitive parts.
The point the video makes is they couldn't know some of the things required for the coincidence.
All the coincidences line up in the metric system, but not the cubit system.
You really shouldn't be so dismissive of something you at least haven't heard out.
Like I said I'm on the fence about some of the stuff in the video, but it's at least worth watching in it's entirety even through the repetitive parts.
reply posted on 23-2-2012 @ 06:04 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by Pigraphia
If anything that means time travel.
Bare in mind of course, that if it lines up in one system, it lines up in all systems. Math is universal.
My arm lining up with a meter scale to my height would align the same way in feet.
If anything that means time travel.
Bare in mind of course, that if it lines up in one system, it lines up in all systems. Math is universal.
My arm lining up with a meter scale to my height would align the same way in feet.
edit on 23-2-2012 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)
reply posted on 23-2-2012 @ 07:19 PM by Pigraphia
reply to post by Gorman91
You know I was going to type an entire response, but why bother you don't care.
You have already drawn your conclusions and aren't willing to see any other sides.
I honestly am on the fence about most of the information I saw and have found, but at least I'm willing to see new information.
You aren't even willing to look at something objectively.
You know I was going to type an entire response, but why bother you don't care.
You have already drawn your conclusions and aren't willing to see any other sides.
I honestly am on the fence about most of the information I saw and have found, but at least I'm willing to see new information.
You aren't even willing to look at something objectively.
reply posted on 23-2-2012 @ 07:50 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by Pigraphia
I am. After all, it makes sense to look at real mysteries like in Peru, which we now have a nice topic on the main page just on that topic.
Looking at it objectively, it is literally a joke to look at the pyramids and see a mystery. There is no longer one. It is solved.
I only ask you support your own beliefs and not tell me to just go watch someone else's work. It's your side of an argument, speak.
I am. After all, it makes sense to look at real mysteries like in Peru, which we now have a nice topic on the main page just on that topic.
Looking at it objectively, it is literally a joke to look at the pyramids and see a mystery. There is no longer one. It is solved.
I only ask you support your own beliefs and not tell me to just go watch someone else's work. It's your side of an argument, speak.
edit on
23-2-2012 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)
reply posted on 24-2-2012 @ 09:41 AM by Pigraphia
reply to post by Gorman91
It wasn't my argument.
Someone else used it to support their argument and I was open enough to watch it.
I was just advocating watching it in order to keep an open mind.
To me unless a video is by a well known quack/hoaxer it's worth hearing out at least partially.
They swore the porridge model of the atom was right until the gold foil experiment.
Sure the more we know the harder it is to know more, but we can't just ignore something flat out.
It wasn't my argument.
Someone else used it to support their argument and I was open enough to watch it.
I was just advocating watching it in order to keep an open mind.
To me unless a video is by a well known quack/hoaxer it's worth hearing out at least partially.
They swore the porridge model of the atom was right until the gold foil experiment.
Sure the more we know the harder it is to know more, but we can't just ignore something flat out.
reply posted on 24-2-2012 @ 10:05 AM by 8311-XHT
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by 8311-XHT
I'm asking for you to prove what you think. I've seen enough internet videos to know that they are not worth my time 90% of the time. If you get off on cheap tricks that's great. Speak your own and stop resorting to others to tell a tale.
Why should I go to the trouble of relating all the info in the video when it's already there? If you want to ignore valid info fine.. that's your business... it's obvious why you believe what you do...
reply posted on 24-2-2012 @ 11:23 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by Pigraphia
Except the gold foil experiment provided knowledge where there was none.
Here there is knowledge, and it is being questioned. Without any evidence other than coincidence, which can be answered in far more easier means.
Except the gold foil experiment provided knowledge where there was none.
Here there is knowledge, and it is being questioned. Without any evidence other than coincidence, which can be answered in far more easier means.
reply posted on 24-2-2012 @ 11:24 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by 8311-XHT
Because the video itself has already been answered for. The coincidences answerable in far simpler means, and the broad assumptions put to rest.
If you don't care to argue what you believe, why believe it?
Because the video itself has already been answered for. The coincidences answerable in far simpler means, and the broad assumptions put to rest.
If you don't care to argue what you believe, why believe it?
reply posted on 25-2-2012 @ 03:28 AM by 8311-XHT
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by 8311-XHT
Because the video itself has already been answered for. The coincidences answerable in far simpler means, and the broad assumptions put to rest.
How do you know if you haven't watched it?
If you don't care to argue what you believe, why believe it?
How can I argue with you if you won't even look at the information that is presented? That's the point -- why I want you to look at the info.
Why should I go to the trouble of presenting the info when the video can do it much better.. especially if you aren't even willing to consider it...
reply posted on 25-2-2012 @ 03:33 AM by Gorman91
reply to post by 8311-XHT
Because you, as a viewer, have yet to bring up anything that I haven't heard already that has an answer.
This is called indirect observation, and saves loads of time as I don't have to waste my time on videos already disproven.
These videos rarely have new material, and when they do, it's usually the topic of the conversation. As the topic of the conversation lacked anything truly new, I can deduce the video is the same.
because you've not yet presented any startling new revelations that have yet to be disproven. You follow this constructed conversation to the key. It is, if you haven't gotten my point yet, a distraction from true mysteries, designed to make you waste your life on questioning proven reality.
How do you know if you haven't watched it?
Because you, as a viewer, have yet to bring up anything that I haven't heard already that has an answer.
This is called indirect observation, and saves loads of time as I don't have to waste my time on videos already disproven.
These videos rarely have new material, and when they do, it's usually the topic of the conversation. As the topic of the conversation lacked anything truly new, I can deduce the video is the same.
Why should I go to the trouble of presenting the info when the video can do it much better.. especially if you aren't even willing to consider it...
because you've not yet presented any startling new revelations that have yet to be disproven. You follow this constructed conversation to the key. It is, if you haven't gotten my point yet, a distraction from true mysteries, designed to make you waste your life on questioning proven reality.
reply posted on 25-2-2012 @ 12:51 PM by Pigraphia
reply to post by 8311-XHT
Don't bother, he isn't willing to consider new information.
Most people are too set in their ways to even hear out new information.
The video was great, I wish they actually calculated the chances of so many "coincidences" occurring in the same design.
1-3 coincidences maybe, but all the others I even lost track counting them all.
I honestly have no idea what they meant but they were interesting.
Don't bother, he isn't willing to consider new information.
Most people are too set in their ways to even hear out new information.
The video was great, I wish they actually calculated the chances of so many "coincidences" occurring in the same design.
1-3 coincidences maybe, but all the others I even lost track counting them all.
I honestly have no idea what they meant but they were interesting.
reply posted on 25-2-2012 @ 03:15 PM by 8311-XHT
Originally posted by Pigraphia
reply to post by 8311-XHT
Don't bother, he isn't willing to consider new information.
Most people are too set in their ways to even hear out new information.
The video was great, I wish they actually calculated the chances of so many "coincidences" occurring in the same design.
1-3 coincidences maybe, but all the others I even lost track counting them all.
I honestly have no idea what they meant but they were interesting.
Pigraphia, I agree 100%. Great points! Do me a big favor please.. I need someone to talk to about this... if you get a chance get the book Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion by Pail laViolette. And/or look into Viktor Schauberger's books by Callum Coats. There is FAR more info I can relate to you about the Pyramids that I think no one really understands.
There are places you can find these books online in PDF format if you want I can help you locate those just PM me..
I think this site may have a big part of the puzzle too..
www.nuclearpyramid.com...
89-Year-Old Man Develops Bladeless Bird-Friendly Wind Turbine
Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags
Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags
High speed video reveals the bizarre physics of an ordinary water droplet
Posted 4 days ago with 32 member flags
Posted 4 days ago with 32 member flags
Does this video show a working self propelled magnetic engine?
Posted 7 days ago with 31 member flags
Posted 7 days ago with 31 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
The Eight Year Old Girl Who Didn't Make It Past Her Wedding Night
Breaking Alternative News: 12 hours ago, 19 flags
Breaking Alternative News: 12 hours ago, 19 flags
The Newly Announced Xbox One can recognise your voice, facial features. Is Always Listening to You.
General Conspiracies: 10 hours ago, 9 flags
General Conspiracies: 10 hours ago, 9 flags
3 of Detroit's neighborhoods most dangerous in the country
Other Current Events: 9 hours ago, 9 flags
Other Current Events: 9 hours ago, 9 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
The Eight Year Old Girl Who Didn't Make It Past Her Wedding Night
Breaking Alternative News: 12 hours ago, 106 replies
Breaking Alternative News: 12 hours ago, 106 replies
The Newly Announced Xbox One can recognise your voice, facial features. Is Always Listening to You.
General Conspiracies: 10 hours ago, 31 replies
General Conspiracies: 10 hours ago, 31 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.304 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.304 seconds
