It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Venezuela threatens Britain over Falklands as its president vows to side with Argentina

page: 17
17
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 03:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by gabrielxxx
A little video from the attack to the invencible!

www.youtube.com...

15/11/2011

The britain prince Andrew admited that the attack was true to the daily Telegraph...

You still think the argentinean media was the only one liyng?


There is a nice photograph on the following link, showing HMS Invincible returning home after The Falklands War. You will notice that she is completly undamaged. I will give you credit though for finding that propoganda film which is total fabrication:-

en.wikipedia.org...




posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 03:46 PM
link   
reply to post by MrKipling
 


yes, my uncle lie to my family all the time... thats why he never sleeps well... he miss...
dear god...



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 03:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by gabrielxxx

www.youtube.com...

The britain prince Andrew admited that the attack was true to the daily Telegraph...

You still think the argentinean media was the only one liyng?


Wow.

That 'video' clearly comes from some sort of video game.

Next you will be telling us that Argentina won the 1982 war. No doubt you have a video game sequence to prove that as well.



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 03:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by gabrielxxx
A little video from the attack to the invencible!

www.youtube.com...

15/11/2011

The britain prince Andrew admited that the attack was true to the daily Telegraph...

You still think the argentinean media was the only one liyng?


I'm sorry, that ship profile is not Invincible.
Invincible didn't have an Atlantic bow, nor did she have that massive (ridiculous) communications mast.



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 03:51 PM
link   
reply to post by ollncasino
 


The war was in 1982... sorry is if not HD...
This film is from another UK ship...



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 03:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Soshh
 


Ahem I was 19 when I was on The islands during the conflict against hardened vets who were older than me. I have more respect for those poor kids (who were the same age as me at the time you complete idiot) than some
Fool (who believes that the islands belong to them and wouldn't have the balls to go and do something about it.

Face the facts sunshine you tried in 1982 and was frogmarched from Stanley in your thousands (before #ting and pissing in all the houses in your sacred Malvinas) and if you try it again I hope you like glass car parks in buenos aries



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 03:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by gabrielxxx
reply to post by MrKipling
You are old, weak.... and you try to play macho man? come on...
You go to fight a war against kids... real macho from your part!


I can tell by the way you write that you are young. Very young.

That 'old man' is a real soldier, unlike yourself who is a key board warrior.

While you talk a good fight, he would finish it.



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 03:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by gabrielxxx
reply to post by ollncasino
 


The war was in 1982... sorry is if not HD...
This film is from another UK ship...


Maybe it was this:-

en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 03:56 PM
link   
reply to post by LeBombDiggity
 


look at google images, there are a lot like the one on the video.



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 03:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by gabrielxxx
The war was in 1982... sorry is if not HD...
This film is from another UK ship...


Have you never watched any film from 1982 in the Falklands?

Obviously not. Perhaps you should and then you would realise that your 'film' is from a computer.

Here is a whole page of links of 1982 Falklands film.

Youtube

As you can see, to claim that your video game footage is anything but that is laughable.



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 03:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by alldaylong

Maybe it was this:-

en.wikipedia.org...


No, it couldn't have been filmed from the Belgrano as it was 3 miles under the ocean at that point in time.


edit on 7-2-2012 by ollncasino because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 04:01 PM
link   
reply to post by alldaylong
 


Do you know they sunk the Belgrano outside the exclusion area that UK stablished before the war?
Very macho from the UK...



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 04:02 PM
link   
reply to post by ollncasino
 


casino are you sheldon cooper???
hehehe



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 04:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by gabrielxxx
reply to post by alldaylong
 


Do you know they sunk the Belgrano outside the exclusion area that UK stablished before the war?
Very macho from the UK...


Do you know the Argies "Illegally" invaded The Falkland Islands? Very "Macho" of The Argies.



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 04:05 PM
link   
reply to post by gabrielxxx
 


IF you hadn't invaded in the first place there wouldn't have been a need for a naval exclusion zone

The belgrano was on a direct intercept course for the carrier fleet and was a threat.. Get used to submarines as you'll see (or won't in fact) them again..



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 04:05 PM
link   
reply to post by alldaylong
 


hahahaha!
Like UK did in 1833...
pleaseeee...



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 04:07 PM
link   
reply to post by gabrielxxx
 


You really are a silly little child aren't you? Go back to Wikipedia lad



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 04:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by gabrielxxx
Do you know they sunk the Belgrano outside the exclusion area that UK stablished before the war?
Very macho from the UK...


Bad things happen to people who invade other peoples' islands.

For your information, the Argentine government has never claimed that the sinking of the Belgrano was anything but a legitimate act.

Interestingly, some sources claim that both the Belgrano and the aircraft carrier, the 25th of May were being tracked by nuclear subs. Both could have been sunk. Thatcher decided that sinking the carrier would have been too much so the Belgrano got it.

The Argentine navy sailed back to harbour and played no futher part in the war.



edit on 7-2-2012 by ollncasino because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 04:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by gabrielxxx
reply to post by alldaylong
 


Do you know they sunk the Belgrano outside the exclusion area that UK stablished before the war?
Very macho from the UK...


Does it really matter if the Belgrano was outside the exclusion zone? You (the Argentinians) were the agressors by invading the Falklands, so were deemed the enemy so therefore were at war. War is not nice and there are no 'safe zones' unless in a neutral port, therefore the Belgrano was a legitimate target.

For someone who claims they are educated, you seem to beleive all of the bull# that your Government seems to dole out. Do some research of your own ....... you may actually learn something.



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 04:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by gabrielxxx
reply to post by alldaylong
 


hahahaha!
Like UK did in 1833...
pleaseeee...

Go and learn some real history.

Argentina was a safe haven for Nazi War Criminals after WW2. It would seem that Nazi Propoganda Minister Joseph Goebbels must have been one of those that The Argies gave a home, in reference to the rubbish you have been taught.



new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join