It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Paul camp cries fraud over Nevada Caucus results

page: 7
56
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 6 2012 @ 10:17 PM
link   
reply to post by Xcalibur254
 


......There you go using statistics which are about as useful as a fart in a whirl-wind. Stats are so easily tweaked its laughable. It's the lights going out during vote tallying, stopping vote tallying in the middle, you know....those kind of questionable practices.

edit on 6-2-2012 by ajay59 because: malfunction




posted on Feb, 6 2012 @ 10:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Chalupas
 


Obviously, the votes are not being kept private otherwise the dishonest would'nt know which votes to trash or change now would they?



posted on Feb, 6 2012 @ 10:29 PM
link   
reply to post by ajay59
 


I'm using statistics that come from the Daily Paul. They show that pretty much the only base he has is in the younger category. This has always been a low voting demographic and this year is going to be especially low. He would need at least 50% of the active voters from this demographic to vote and they would all have to vote for him if he wants to win a primary. So far there have only been between 6%-15% of this demographic voting.



posted on Feb, 6 2012 @ 10:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by ajay59
 


I'm using statistics that come from the Daily Paul. They show that pretty much the only base he has is in the younger category. This has always been a low voting demographic and this year is going to be especially low. He would need at least 50% of the active voters from this demographic to vote and they would all have to vote for him if he wants to win a primary. So far there have only been between 6%-15% of this demographic voting.


If you could put down the papers and books long enough to use your own eyes, you would see cause for question since your already positive there is no fraud, or will you call your own eyes liars as well or better yet, turn your head and look away.



posted on Feb, 6 2012 @ 10:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by SheopleNation
reply to post by ajay59
 



Exactly, and Paul could only do that with an Executive order, and I don't believe he could without the payed puppets in Congress not attempting to halt any sort of effort of that sort. Atleast he would veto any new laws that violate our rights Constitutional rights. He would do more Domestically here at home than he would accomplish with Foreign policy. ~SheopleNation


That is not entirely true. He could, without Congress, order our troops home right away.



posted on Feb, 6 2012 @ 10:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Xcalibur254
 





The only kind of voter fraud situation I could actually see with any merit would be Romney taking votes from Gingrich. Of course there's evidence for this so I'm not making any accusations.


So you do admit that voter fraud is taking place? However; when Paul or his supporters say that voter fraud is taking place then it becomes non-existent? How does that work?




Outkast

Then if you can't prove it...don't make the claim. Making claims without proof is just simply crying and looking for excuses. Show me proof of voter fraud in this caucus and I will accept it


I am seeing a favoritism pattern here, Xcalibre254 says that voter fraud is taking place, but when I say voter fraud is taking place you want proof, yet when Xcalibur254 makes a claim you let it pass? Oh wait I know why you don’t care about that or ask about proof about what was stated above because it’s not about Ron Paul! Anyone else can cry fraud, but Ron Paul and his supporters. I see it now, I am finished with this thread.



posted on Feb, 6 2012 @ 10:54 PM
link   
To me it's painfully obvious that the" Paul busters" here have nothing to do with law as a profession! Proof comes out in court where accusations lead. Somehow they think the proof needs to be shown before the case can proceed to court, kinda like the cart before the horse.



posted on Feb, 6 2012 @ 10:56 PM
link   
reply to post by KonquestAbySS
 


I'm not saying there is voter fraud. I'm saying that if voter fraud were occurring it would be more likely for votes to be taken Gingrich and given to Romney. Such a thing would be almost imperceptible in some states. On the other hand taking large amounts of votes from Paul and giving to them to Romney would be blatantly obvious considering that the final results would be drastically different from the entrance and exit polls.



posted on Feb, 6 2012 @ 11:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by KonquestAbySS
 


I'm not saying there is voter fraud. I'm saying that if voter fraud were occurring it would be more likely for votes to be taken Gingrich and given to Romney. Such a thing would be almost imperceptible in some states. On the other hand taking large amounts of votes from Paul and giving to them to Romney would be blatantly obvious considering that the final results would be drastically different from the entrance and exit polls.


I completely disagree, IMO the TPTB threw two cronies out there they knew they could count on to wipe their backsides with the constitution because they actually fear Paul and what he stands for! Stacked the deck against him IMO.

edit on 7-2-2012 by ajay59 because: illiteracy



posted on Feb, 6 2012 @ 11:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by Wookiep
 


The reason for the affidavit is because those caucuses specifically for people who were unable to vote during the normal caucus due to their religious beliefs. It wasn't for people who were too lazy to get up at 9 in the morning to go vote.


Whatever reason they wanted to give for turning down voters was not only against the constitution but also against those voters civil rights! The GOP can't discriminate because of someones religion, that's nonsense! They were forcing people to sign something in order to vote and LIE about their religion. The Paul supporters didn't buy it, and refused to lie by signing it. Lazy huh? I cannot fathom how you could defend this completely crazy idea. Don't EVER ask why this country is in complete turmoil and collapse when it happens, because we're witnessing it right now and people like you are defending it.
edit on 6-2-2012 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2012 @ 11:44 PM
link   
reply to post by usernameconspiracy
 

Yes even if Ron Paul won in a landslide i would have questions if the ballot was counted in secret theres no need to count something in secret if there is nothing to hide and thats the whole point if your going to have open elections



posted on Feb, 6 2012 @ 11:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Screwed
 


I will get on here and spew hatred towards Mitt Romney for Free every day till the gates of Hell are wide open if it keeps him from taking the seat as the ruler of the free world. He represents everything that is wrong with this nation and the people who have made it so. It is a sad end to the splintered and tattered Republican Party when this is the best candidate they can muster for President of the United States.



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 12:07 AM
link   
I ask you, why on earth would TPTB rig votes for and against Newt and Mitt, their own puppets who would trash the constitution at the drop of a hat for them? The constitution is what TPTB have been trying to erase or nullify from the beginning. Paul is the guy trying to save and/or resurrect the constitution! You people need to pay more attention and get your ducks in a row. A land-mine for you back-stabbers, The position being vied for is Preident of the UNITED STATES not the world! Fix it here first, then fix the other nations when and if they ask for help.



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 12:12 AM
link   
reply to post by strokker
 


I admire your passion and agree with you and I will go a step further and say that the worst thing that could happen to this nation at this point is for ANYONE but Ron Paul to be elected.

BUT,

I think your passion could be better utilized supporting RP and not tearing down the other guy.




I was once asked why I don't participate in anti-war demonstrations. I said that I will never do that, but as soon as you have a pro-peace rally, I'll be there. - Mother Theresa

edit on 7-2-2012 by Screwed because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 12:14 AM
link   
1st - If you are a true Patriot (look up the meaning) than you would vote for Ron Paul just for his stance to FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION not just Swear On it. 2nd - If you can look me in the eye and say you trust Obama, Romney, and Gingrich over Santorium and Paul than you deserve to die. 3rd - If you believe in Santorium's foreign policy over Paul's than your misinformed. So, in my Conclusion you either have a choice for Santorum or Paul based on there Foreign policy because if you even remotely like Obama, Romney, or Gingrich your just like the rest of them and were screwed. Anyone want to argue this regardless if there getting paid or not??



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 12:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
I am finished with this thread.


Their mission has been accomplished.
edit on 7-2-2012 by Screwed because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 12:24 AM
link   
reply to post by Screwed
 


No this thread has been accomplished, there is really nothing more to be said everything else will be repetitive.



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 12:28 AM
link   
reply to post by KonquestAbySS
 
Master thread guy.

Juss sayen. I keep hearing about and recently seeing the so called PAID goons against Dr. President Ron Paul and would like a stab at them.
edit on 7-2-2012 by hoochymama because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 12:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by Screwed
 


No this thread has been accomplished, there is really nothing more to be said everything else will be repetitive.


Well said! No use arguing with people who can not hear rebuttal because they are so in love with the sound of their own rhetoric ringing in their ears.



posted on Feb, 7 2012 @ 12:43 AM
link   
reply to post by UKTruth
 

If the government cannot prove the accuracy, honesty,and fairness of the elections by which they claim authority over the people, then the people are neither morally nor legally obligated to obey that government, pay its bills, or send their children to die in that government's wars.



new topics

top topics



 
56
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join