It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by saltdog
. Sooner or later the gravey train, that this nation has for the lazy unwilling to work people...will catch up to it.
Yep.
Do you really think that something would change if Ron Paul were to win?
Very unlikely, as throughout his 30 year career in Congress, he hasn't been corrupted.
I don't think it will, either he will end up being a puppet
The corruption, I disagree with entirely, but him getting killed seems like it's very likely. Don't get me wrong, I love the guy and support him more than anyone, but that doesn't mean that he's bulletproof. And these wealthy bankers and whoever else is controlling our government from behind the scenes wouldn't lose a second of sleep over assassinating him.
or end up dead. I don't like it but thats the reality.
I agree that there would have to be a massive event for things to change, but this doesn't necessarily mean a violent revolution. Why not a peaceful revolution where the people wake up, and realize that things need to change, and they make this change happen without picking up a weapon?
For anything to change the entire thing has to burn down, then bulldozed away before something better can be built, its so corrupt, even the ashes would be corrupt.
Originally posted by kaleshchand
reply to post by TupacShakur
Do you really think that something would change if Ron Paul were to win?
I don't think it will, either he will end up being a puppet, or end up dead.
Originally posted by SWCCFAN
reply to post by ownbestenemy
My understanding is that the electors are either republican or democrat. so the third party would not get any votes from the electoral college. the second place puppet would win.
Right?
Originally posted by TupacShakur
reply to post by kaleshchand
Yep.
Do you really think that something would change if Ron Paul were to win?
Very unlikely, as throughout his 30 year career in Congress, he hasn't been corrupted.
I don't think it will, either he will end up being a puppet
The corruption, I disagree with entirely, but him getting killed seems like it's very likely. Don't get me wrong, I love the guy and support him more than anyone, but that doesn't mean that he's bulletproof. And these wealthy bankers and whoever else is controlling our government from behind the scenes wouldn't lose a second of sleep over assassinating him.
or end up dead. I don't like it but thats the reality.
I agree that there would have to be a massive event for things to change, but this doesn't necessarily mean a violent revolution. Why not a peaceful revolution where the people wake up, and realize that things need to change, and they make this change happen without picking up a weapon?
For anything to change the entire thing has to burn down, then bulldozed away before something better can be built, its so corrupt, even the ashes would be corrupt.
If 95% of Americans supported getting rid of the Fed and simply following the Constitution, would those 5% be able to say "Nope, you're wrong, do it our way"? I don't think so. I think it's possible to have a peaceful revolution, but we're so far down the line that it seems more and more unlikely with each passing month.
Originally posted by Tw0Sides
Originally posted by SWCCFAN
reply to post by Tw0Sides
I see it as a lose lose situation for America no one with the exception of Congressmen Paul on the republican side make any sense.
I wonder if a third party person did win the popular vote how would the electoral college work then?
I too am for RP.
But will vote Obama , instead of Mitt or Grewt.
No way anyone but the current POTUS or Mitt will win, it what they want.
A Punch and Judy show in the WH.
What if Obama looses in 2012?,