Zionist's behind Anti-Syrian Propaganda?, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times
Topic started on 5-2-2012 @ 04:52 PM by jameshawkings
Below you'll find evidence that Zionist group B'nai B'rith have their finger prints on the current fabricated anti-Syrian propaganda that we keep seeing in the news every day.

Warning, racial discrimination will not be tolerated, please keep your replies on topic. (Also, this is not about whether Israel has a right to exist or whether Zionism is racism, for the sake of this thread assume Israel has the right to exist. The real question is does Israel have the right to overthrow it's neighboring regimes using underhand tactics?)

It's often said that it is Israel who would benefit the most from the overthrow of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Many ATS posters have shown evidence this is not a natural revolution in Syria; it's actually one that's been planned, organized and funded from outside Syria. There are plenty of threads on this, so instead I would like to trace the funding of the propaganda.

We now know that we were lied to about Libya, there were film studios used and fake videos/messages posted on YouTube and Twitter. Now Libya has real humanitarian problems, but the UN is no longer interested. Instead the cross hairs are now on Syria. The rebels from Libya, who we were told were Libyan, but actually turned out not to be, are now in Syria. They are being funded by The West to overthrow Assad and have him replaced with a puppet who's strings are pulled by The West.

Personally, my view of the world is not one of 'Zionist' control, but rather one of 'Globalist Bankers' in control. However, on this occasion I wanted to point out a clear 'Zionist' link with the current anti-Syrian propaganda being pumped out in the news, especially with Israel being located so close to Syria.

Who is telling us there are humanitarian problems in Syria? With Libya there were a myriad of Libyan "human rights groups" operating in the USA, UK, and Switzerland. Their stories were later proven to be false when the real human rights groups entered Libya; the evidence had been fabricated as an excuse to call for intervention. So who's currently telling us what's going on in Syria, let's take a look.

In a BBC article titled "Syria crisis: Hillary Clinton calls UN veto travesty'" it says that "At least 28 civilians were killed by security forces across Syria on Sunday, mainly in the central city of Homs, said the London-based campaign group Syrian Observatory for Human Rights".
www.bbc.co.uk...

So, the BBC are getting their information from a group in London Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, let's find out who they are.

Wikipedia says "The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights is a UK-based group opposed to the rule of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, purporting to be a human rights organisation. It is funded by the National Endowment for Democracy."
en.wikipedia.org...

Ok, so the group is funded by National Endowment for Democracy, who are they?

According to Wikipedia "The National Endowment for Democracy, or NED, is a U.S. non-profit organization that was founded in 1983 to promote democracy."
en.wikipedia.org...

In the same article It also says "The President of the National Endowment for Democracy, Carl Gershman"...who's he?

"In 1968, he worked in the research department of B'nai B'rith, and in 1972 he served on the Governing Council of the American Jewish Committee"
en.wikipedia.org...

Something's not sounding right now, B'nai B'rith, as in "the oldest Jewish service organization in the world, is committed to the security and continuity of the Jewish people and the State of Israel"

en.wikipedia.org...

This evidence suggests that effectively it is B'nai B'rith fabricating evidence to call for regime-change in Syria for the benefit of Israel, not for the benefit of the people of Syria.

PS Keep in mind that the propaganda is being shown to the Syrian people via Al-Jazeera, the same way it was used to feed the Libyan's with propaganda and turn them against Gaddafi . If you're in any doubt about who really controls Al-Jazeera look into how close a former Israeli media tycoon (Haim Saban) came to buying 50% of the Qatari network
edit on 5-2-2012 by jameshawkings because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 5-2-2012 @ 06:42 PM by EvanB
reply to post by jameshawkings


Im ALL for regime change in the UK

The sooner the better in my book..

Truth is, no-one here can know for sure what is really going on in Syria at the moment as Assad has barred all foriegn journos from the country

Funny that..

Then we have the Arab league turning their back on one of the main players in said league for the brutalizing of his people.... I choked at that one too.. But when you have the Turks massing on the border ready to intervene you have to wonder hey?

All of those countries have vast inteligence networks too and are privy to info we are not, and if they are crying fowl too, the whole zionist bs that gets spouted on here becomes mute..

Do you not think that the Arabs know the info in this OP already??

Get real
edit on 5-2-2012 by EvanB because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 5-2-2012 @ 06:54 PM by jameshawkings
If it was the UN or China enforcing regime change in the UK, rather than the people, it would most likely not be a change for the positive from the people's perspective.

This is a war of information, the people in the Arab countries will be finding it difficult to avoid the propaganda. The secret services in Syria (and other Arab nations) are well aware of what's going on and Assad has said what's going on is a foreign conspiracy, just as Russia said the same thing after their UN Veto. The people at the top of all of the nations involved know what this really is, they know it's a covert attempt at regime change from The West. None of them will care about the fabricated 'Humanitarian Crisis', but each country will decide which outcome benefits them. The United Nations and the Globalist Banking powers behind it put a lot of pressure on all of the countries voting, it's very brave to Veto; it's a huge risk to Veto anything like this. Messing with the UN and the Globalist Banking Agenda can bring severe consequences to individuals





Originally posted by EvanB
reply to
post by jameshawkings


Im ALL for regime change in the UK

The sooner the better in my book..

Truth is, no-one here can know for sure what is really going on in Syria at the no as Assad has barred all foriegn journos from the country

Funny that..

Then we have the Arab league turning their back on one of the main players in said league for the brutalizing of his people.... I choked at that one too.. But when you have the Turks massing on the border ready to intervene you have to wonder hey?

All of those countries have vast inteligence networks too and are privy to info we are not, and if they are crying fowl too, the whole zionist bs that gets spouted on here becomes mute..

Do you not think that the Arabs know the info in this OP already??

Get real



reply posted on 11-2-2012 @ 01:16 AM by slanteye
reply to post by ZeroKnowledge


Israel is hoping for a regime change to stem guerilla warfare. Israel hopes that the new govt. would stop the rockets from being fired from across Syria. Israel may be good at fighting wars but guerilla warfare is a different cup of tea. UK had a taste of it in N. Ireland. The US had a taste of it in Vietnam, Iraq and Afganistan. Opponents do not wear uniforms and can disappear into the crowd. Soldiers are like sitting duck and most of the time the enemy is just right next to you and you would not know it. Cross border attacks is getting to Israel's raw nerve and there is not much it could do to stop it short of an all out invasion. Its like getting a slap in the dark and not being able to do anything about it till now. A new govt does not ensure peace but at least buy some for the time being


reply posted on 11-2-2012 @ 04:52 AM by hmdphantom
For your information :

They(the mercenaries) are penetrating Syria in
Homs.

They have been coming through Lebanon.

The whole plan is to isolate Lebanon either by isolating Syria as a whole and taking Homs as a bridge.

But it seems they are going to fail as Asad claims he has control over Homs borders.

At the end of the day , those mercenaries who entered Syrian soil will get what they deserve.

S + F.
edit on 11/2/12 by hmdphantom because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Israel as Popular as North Korea According to BBC Poll
  Posted 12 days ago with 35 member flags
Settlers filmed shooting at Palestinian protesters‎
  Posted 8 days ago with 31 member flags
Assad says Syria is fighting foreign mercenaries
  Posted 13 days ago with 9 member flags
Double standards in Egypt
  Posted 8 days ago with 7 member flags
\'Putin said Israel would take care of Iran\'
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags