It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by remembering
In one of the books by Stephen Hawkings he states that gravity is the one force that is felt everywhere in the universe instantaneously. This would mean that the delay problem would not be an issue.
The speed of gravitational waves in the general theory of relativity is equal to the speed of light in vacuum, c.[1] Within the theory of special relativity, the constant c is not exclusively about light; instead it is the highest possible speed for any physical interaction in nature.
Originally posted by rom12345
reply to post by artistpoet
I have read that this has been reported, however (according to those that reported it ), there are too many factors involved to rule out errors in the experiment and/or measuring technique, to disregard Einstein's work at this point.
however, I really hope they do find a loophole, to this 'killjoy' limit
One curious effect is that, unlike ordinary particles, the speed of a tachyon increases as its energy decreases. In particular, E approaches zero when v approaches infinity. (For ordinary bradyonic matter, E increases with increasing speed, becoming arbitrarily large as v approaches c, the speed of light). Therefore, just as bradyons are forbidden to break the light-speed barrier, so too are tachyons forbidden from slowing down to below c, because infinite energy is required to reach the barrier from either above or below.
Originally posted by hisshadow
and it has begun !
www.newscientist.com...
a diamond in every cellphone, car, plane, space ship... the begining of a quantum network is here
Originally posted by artistpoet
The means of communication are secondary to the information they/it transmits.
Technological advancement is not the measure of what a Human being is - The intention for it's use is a more fundamental question.
Originally posted by Sachyriel
Depending on what you want to communicate, there are obviously different mediums.
If you are communicating at light speed with a colony at a nearby star, obviously you set up laser transmission networks to ensure that not only will the signal be sent and received, any gravitational anomalies that might pass in the large space can be accounted for and the real message let through. If the Star was 22 light years away and Colonization a large task then the Laser Signal Networks come pre-built with certain commands and subroutines based on what could go wrong with the plan.
The 22 Light Year space could only be a 44 year ping between our Earth saying 'shipment ready' and the colony saying 'acknowledged and ready to recieve", they do not need to send what the shipment contains, that could have been sent ahead of time with the Laser Network to be in place at the destination.
The 44 Year Ping can be diminished with the pre-placed ready-to-send stream of goods, an 88 year long agreement to ship materials and personnel ahead of time would be utilizing the proper way to send, track and receive these signals as well as the shipments. However most planners would tack on an extra 12 years to make it a steady 100 year plan, some leeway with interpreting any incidents to repair any major flaws in the plan.
If every hundred years we need to make a new plan for shipping, both sides can have 44 years to talk about it and 12 years to Ratify the agreement and ready the materials or personnel to be sent. It would be a long time to a human, however on a galactic scale this is but a blink of an eye!
Originally posted by cloudyday
Originally posted by artistpoet
The means of communication are secondary to the information they/it transmits.
Technological advancement is not the measure of what a Human being is - The intention for it's use is a more fundamental question.
The technology of communication would affect the nature of communication. Are we talking about telegrams that cost a billion dollars per character and take 10 years to arrive? Or are we talking about free FTL internet links for everybody?edit on 5-2-2012 by cloudyday because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by artistpoet
Originally posted by cloudyday
Originally posted by artistpoet
The means of communication are secondary to the information they/it transmits.
Technological advancement is not the measure of what a Human being is - The intention for it's use is a more fundamental question.
The technology of communication would affect the nature of communication. Are we talking about telegrams that cost a billion dollars per character and take 10 years to arrive? Or are we talking about free FTL internet links for everybody?edit on 5-2-2012 by cloudyday because: (no reason given)
What does FTL mean please?
Originally posted by nineix
Worm Hole Internet Protocol - WHIP. Whip it good.
Yeah, I'm still in a silly mood.
Communication would really depend on distances.
I'm not going to call your cell phone if you're standing right in front of me.
Same would go for interplanetary versus interstellar versus intergalactic communication.
For interplanetary talk, standard radio might be boss enough. It's cheap. It gets the job done.
From our sun to another one, well then we're looking at all sorts of crazy lag times in years, decades, centuries, or more.
Originally posted by cloudyday
Originally posted by artistpoet
The means of communication are secondary to the information they/it transmits.
Technological advancement is not the measure of what a Human being is - The intention for it's use is a more fundamental question.
The technology of communication would affect the nature of communication. Are we talking about telegrams that cost a billion dollars per character and take 10 years to arrive? Or are we talking about free FTL internet links for everybody?edit on 5-2-2012 by cloudyday because: (no reason given)