US threatens Sweden with watch list sanctions if they don’t prosecute The Pirate Bay. , page 1

Cable revelas extent of lapdoggery from swedish Government on Copyright Monopoly

Among the treasure troves of recently released WikiLeaks cables, we find one whose significance has bypassed Swedish media. In short: every law proposal, every ordinance, and every governmental report hostile to the net, youth, and civil liberties here in Sweden in recent years have been commissioned by the US government and industry interests.

Read more at:

falkvinge.net...


So essentially the United States is saying if you do not listen to us, we will issue a trade sanction. That entails making the Swedish government become opposed to file sharing (which major US companies started in the first place), making Swedish ISPs liable and giving them the ability to regulate (interfere) net traffic - and to hurry up and take The Pirate Bay out of business.

Now I know some will just state the US is just looking after copyrighted material and stopping piracy, but in my opinion it goes much deeper then that. It is all about power, about being able to control the internet.

What say you?

reply to post by MidnightTide

---

[post content removed at the request of the copyright holder]

TextImperialism, as defined by Dictionary of Human Geography, is "the creation and/or maintenance of an unequal economic, cultural, and territorial relationship, usually between states and often in the form of an empire, based on domination and subordination." Imperialism, as described by that work is primarily a Western undertaking that employs "expansionist, merchantilist policies"

en.wikipedia.org...

Imperialism.

reply to post by MidnightTide

---

what are watch list sanctions ?

reply to post by icepack

---

what are watch list sanctions ?

I agree with the previous poster who said Imperialism. However, the naked truth looks like this:

What watch lists does the State Department maintain?
A. The US State Department maintains multiple lists of sanctioned or restricted parties, including:
Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO)
List of Statutorily Debarred Parties
List of Administratively Debarred Parties
Entity List for Sanctions for the Transfer of Lethal Military Equipment
Entity List for Missile Sanctions Laws
among others...

Among others...I love that!

It can cost a country or entity that is violating a sanction

fines for violations of other watch lists can be substantial. Depending on the program, criminal penalties can include fines ranging from $50,000 to $10,000,000 and imprisonment ranging from 10 to 30 years for willful violations. Depending on the program, civil penalties range from $11,000 to $1,000,000 for each violation.

And, further indication that 9/11 served multiple agendas, th

Government sanctions have existed for many years, but since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 the Federal government has dramatically increased its use of watch lists.

www.verifilter.com...

Newest tactic in the US arsenal, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency will seize domain names in a civil suit. That is the sites themselves have to prove they were doing no wrong - innocent until proven guilty - hardly.

(and they can do this because they used U.S. domain suffixes .net, .com, and .org)

Originally posted by justwokeup
reply to post by MidnightTide

---

[post content removed at the request of the copyright holder]

Exactly my point. They do not want certain ideas getting out to the public. They do not want people to become informed.

reply to post by staticarium

---

Well then, what super powers should we be going after and why?
Just curious...

I certainly don't think we need a global presence even though it has it's benefits. We are just going about it all wrong. It's like your neighbor constantly yelling out the window, telling you that your lawn is not green enough and your making his property look bad.

I'm on your side, just don't think there's a good reason to go after anybody at the moment.

Originally posted by ElmersGluon
reply to post by staticarium

---

Well then, what super powers should we be going after and why?
Just curious...

I certainly don't think we need a global presence even though it has it's benefits. We are just going about it all wrong. It's like your neighbor constantly yelling out the window, telling you that your lawn is not green enough and your making his property look bad.

I'm on your side, just don't think there's a good reason to go after anybody at the moment.

edit on 5-2-2012 by ElmersGluon because: (no reason given)

This isn't a discussion. Americans out of Europe now.

I am thinking that this is a big reason for the push to stem the tide of information distribution.



Frankly, I am surprised that the connection hasn't been made sooner on this site.

reply to post by MidnightTide

---

Give me a break!
Who the hell are we gonna go after in Sweden?
This guy.....

reply to post by MidnightTide

---

More than one can play at blacklisting.

I think the rest of the world should blacklist US sites and corporates in response.

and close US bases on foreign soil.

and arrest known CIA agents.

Enforce the Marshall plan on the US.

GOP moves to keep Gary Johnson off the ballot
  Posted 9 days ago with 32 member flags

The GOP Conspiracy – Hidden in Plain Site
  Posted 10 days ago with 14 member flags

The JFK Assassination, An Overview
  Posted 19 days ago with 12 member flags

The Politics of Rape
  Posted 3 days ago with 10 member flags

Retreat! Government shuts Arpaio probe; no charges filed
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags

Mafia Hit-Man & Teamster Boss Helped Joe Biden Become U.S. Senator
  Posted 3 days ago with 8 member flags

My Political Rabbit Hole, Why I Won\'t Vote Obama OR Romney..Left or Right EVER Again.
  Posted 4 days ago with 6 member flags

Feminism and the Reorganization of Society
  Posted 2 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: