flipped between msnbc and cnn around 11 pm est, just got to posting this.

major discrepancy!

MSNBC:
19% reporting
romney - 3569 - 42%
gingrich - 2059 - 25%
paul - 1663 - 20%
santorum - 1112 - 13%

CNN:
13% reporting
romney - 5601 - 47%
gingrich - 2626 - 22%
paul - 2320 - 19%
santorum - 1412 - 12%

now.. maybe these msm have different caucuses reporting to them but i think this is untrue. fox is reporting a whole different total. don't they usually recieve the same information at the same time?

how does cnn have 6% less than msnbc with thousands more votes counted?

the process is rigged. they are showing it to us, just like the elite claim, they have to tell us what they do before they do it, their "code of ethics" as they say. need to look at individual results per county/site but for now this is just crazy.

I too have noticed this each network is reporting at different perecentage rates and numbers are off my thousands between each page. This election there is massive voters fraud this is just my opinion. They want a Romeny vs Obama card. Easy pickings for Obama- they are basically one in the same.


Online support for Rep. Paul is heavy, they have just been arm chair crusaders unfortunatly it will not work VOTE PEOPLE VOTE

Right On...I thought Ron was in second ALL DAY until the very end,,what a let down to see fkkn Newt pass him. What dya expect from a state that has gambling but you cant hit a joint

and they also never include Paul in national poles....

there was just on CNN a live feed from (i think they said) Clark County, where the late causus was being counted live and i was counting in my head as they read it off before they cut the feed, paul had 22, romney 11, gingrich 4, santorum 1.

there is major election fraud. not just because i support ron paul. but because they tell us whats happening and we are too dumb (collectively) to stand up!

What solid proof or evidence is there to show real voter fraud....and if there is genuine voter fraud going on then what happens? What can be done, if anything?

Ron Paul just beat Mitt Romney 3:1 in the live caucus on CNN. I wouldn't be surprised if this is the real vote total of Nevada.

Someone please tell me how they can have Romney as the winner, when clark county, the most populace county in nevada hasnt reported yet?

Originally posted by imawlinn
Someone please tell me how they can have Romney as the winner, when clark county, the most populace county in nevada hasnt reported yet?

Just because it is the most populace doesn't have much bearing on a State Party Caucus. It all depends on who is registered, who attends and then who votes at the caucus meetings.

Think of it this way...nationally there is approximately a 40% voter turnout in general elections; about the same for primaries. Caucus meetings draw far less registered voters to determine a parties delegates -- not even the candidate.

CNN has Romney winning with Paul in 3rd. Still only 43% of the vote in. What do ya think?

Yeah.. there is something very wrong. It's not that Paul didn't win (though he did win two very large precincts by a large margin and still got third!), but the fact that Gingrich got second that is what is wrong. I think they know when Paul does get another solid second or especially first place showing, the real race begins and something is up.

Nevada wouldn't vote that way for Gingrich. Paul got second place last election against much stronger leading candidates. Something is very wrong. I hope the whistle gets blown on this one.