Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 98 times


reply posted on 5-2-2012 @ 12:35 PM by BrokenCircles
reply to post by Bumface Jones


Originally posted by Bumface Jones












lmao. That's not the same thing lol.
You just posted the image.
Originally posted by Bumface Jones




[ ats]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/warn-topic.png[/ ats]








  • Go to the OP of this thread..
  • Click 'Quote'.
  • With the use of simple deduction, it's not difficult to determine which link caused the problem.


  • reply posted on 5-2-2012 @ 12:36 PM by BrokenCircles
    reply to post by GhettoRice


    Originally posted by GhettoRice

    Agreed this doesn't make sense.

    Do the mods not realize without explanation they look like reactionary children. I mean we should all be adults here and overstand that this is why so many here are not please with politicians and tptb (NO EXPLANATIONS)

    WTH Happened?

    It actually does make sense though. I'll even repeat myself, because I know that many of you will never see the bottom of page 2.





    Originally posted by BrokenCircles


    lol. I see a lot of whining and complaining here, but did any of you actually try to figure out what actually happened with the OP? This time, it was not a Mod. It is automatic.

    I don't know what was there before, but this is what is there now, in the Opening Post of this thread. I simply removed the link to the restricted website.

    Originally posted by relocator


    The jadeite jade source, if found, would be "something geochemically extraordinary," the authors write in the paper, to be published in an upcoming issue of the European Journal of Mineralogy

    Source

    I find this really interesting... I love collecting rocks. I love turquoise and jade...etc.

    I thought I would post to see if others find this interesting and provide an opportunity for others to add their thoughts.

    edit on 4-2-2012 by relocator because: added another link
    edit on 4-2-2012 by relocator because: (no reason given)


    Obviously, there was an opening post at first.
    Then an additional link was added, and there was no longer an Opening Post.
    So remove that link.
    It's not rocket science. It's called common sense.





    edit on 2/5/12 by BrokenCircles because: (no reason given)




    reply posted on 5-2-2012 @ 12:42 PM by Sly1one
    reply to post by relocator



    I would just like to post in this thread as record of my complete and total disagreement with ATS and their censorship irregardless of their childish over-sensitive reasoning.

    Unfortunately the nature of ATS being a “business” lets them do things such as this. It is entirely within their rights to censor information.

    If they continue down this road they will see how incredibly “bad for business” it is to censor information when their apparent “business” is to “deny ignorance”…

    Eventually they will lose their best content creating members because of their censoring nature. The “customer” base here isn’t as zombified as most and they know and question censorship when they see it. I have seen many good members who contributed a great deal of quality content to this forum LEAVE because of these VERY same reasons.

    Keep this up ATS and you will inevitably have a forum full of trolls…

    Oh and thanks for giving me the benefit of the doubt in my ability to determine if the site you censored was responsible for as you put it “fabricating vicious lies”

    Oh wait you didn’t…


    I would also like to add that I would love to discuss the topic at hand but this whole thread/topic was gutted and derailed from the get go...


    reply posted on 5-2-2012 @ 12:45 PM by whatsinaname
    reply to post by BrokenCircles



    ive been here since 2007, at the least, i was banned for posting an image showing that iran is being surrounded, and i made a new account after a few years of lurking.

    ed: i am trying to resolve the issue, I wanna know why ats is hiding an accusation like the one on that link, are you saying you have no interest in this at all?
    edit on 5/2/2012 by whatsinaname because: (no reason given)



    reply posted on 5-2-2012 @ 01:09 PM by whatsinaname
    reply to post by BrokenCircles



    what do you mean hiding what? click the censored link and figure out what ats related topic is written there, its not pretty, and frankly i don't buy it, but the fact is that ats has denied the right to even read it from here.

    not to mention my signiture has been modified since I last posted here, apparently this isn't a free expresion zone like the label stated either. free speach, free expression, someone got some 'splainin' to do.


    reply posted on 5-2-2012 @ 01:34 PM by seraphnb
    reply to post by relocator



    1) Please do not leave, Relocator! It is never good to start off on the wrong foot (I speak from experience), but it is okay, after all. I actually did not know that Signs of the Times was against ATS dogma.

    2) If you press the "quote" button on the OP, you can see the original post. Thus you can tell it was NOT A MOD. GET OVER IT, FOLKS! The mods, for once, are not the ones to blame for this! If it was a mod, you would only see the image link when you press the quote button. Thus can be seen from this off-topic post from Bumface Jones. All it shows is the image link, as the mod deleted the text and replaced it with the picture. No big deal.

    3) I can tell that somebody is going to go on one of those unfriendly sites, where they probably live, and complain about this being an example of a cover-up of the truth. Thus the cycle completes. If I may express my simple and honest opinion, ATS should get rid of this filter. If we want these ridiculous claims to cease, we should be proactive and nip it in the bud. To eliminate the result, we should examine the cause . . .

    Just my two cents,
    Seraph
    Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



    More Mysterious Nazca Lines From Space
      Posted 6 days ago with 124 member flags
    The Aztec and Norse god of war are both missing one hand.
      Posted 17 days ago with 48 member flags
    63,000-Year-Old Modern Human Skull Found in Laos
      Posted 18 days ago with 38 member flags
    Multiple Human Species Were Likely The Norm
      Posted 11 days ago with 37 member flags
    The Sumerian \'Flood-Storm\' weapon.
      Posted 6 days ago with 18 member flags