ive never seen the first video before
i skipped forward to the second "bit of action" at 30.20 and WOW!
NOW THATS UNUSUAL TO SAY THE LEAST.
ive never seen anything like that filmed so clearly.
thats all ive watched at the moment but so far this looks like a quality video
star and flag all the way

pause the video at 31:28 and you will see the object magically appears in front of the trees where 1 second earlier in appears to be 1000's of feet in the air. FAKE FAKE FAKE

It would be better if he could of focused on a airplane and zoomed in because I wonder If it would be blurry too.. If their where visitors from another planet why is every object different? I think if these are UFOs it's human made

Great Videos.

At 30:19 whatever he is filming is the same as my first glance at the UFO I saw in March 2003. And it was only across the road. I got an impression of jet black with holes "burned in". Second glance it took on more of it's shape and it was just filled in black with a pink-red flashing light underneath, fat body and short turned up wings.

I think Anthony Woods has filmed the real thing. Whatever it is.

Why is it that al the so called super movies... are made (shot) with an old camera...
the urzi case is the same.... these guys make hours of video ... but keep filming with old garbage

Because of that i think its fake... balloons with a string or something like that


--------------------------------

- Life is like a game of chess, its all about the moves you make -

Originally posted by goldcoin

after I watched this documentary for the first time, I was certain of it, 100% not a shadow of a doubt in my mind. So I thought I'd share it with ATS!

Hello Goldcoin, although we can't explain what those objects are it doesn't mean they are from another world, it just means they are u.f.o's. You say you're 100 percent certain these are other worldly but are you basing your conclusion on the fact that they are unidentified as I don't see a reason to think they're alien? Also, what did you see when you were younger?

Originally posted by Hawkwind.

Originally posted by goldcoin

after I watched this documentary for the first time, I was certain of it, 100% not a shadow of a doubt in my mind. So I thought I'd share it with ATS!

Hello Goldcoin, although we can't explain what those objects are it doesn't mean they are from another world, it just means they are u.f.o's. You say you're 100 percent certain these are other worldly but are you basing your conclusion on the fact that they are unidentified as I don't see a reason to think they're alien? Also, what did you see when you were younger?

When I was about 16 years old, I went out to a field in central Virginia with my telescope just before sunset to catch a glimpse of Mercury. After observing it for a few minutes, I looked up and saw a slow moving triangular aircraft, with three large lights. It's very similar to the object in the image below, minus that central light.



It was moving very slowly, so it either had to be incredibly large flying fast at high altitude, or reasonably sized and flying incredibly slow. After about 10 seconds of observing it, it went beyond the treeline and out of sight. At 16 I was quite young, and it freaked me out so I ran home and never really spoke of it again.

At this point is when I started doing some light research on UFOs. The thing that convinces me that they are alien is the speed at which these objects move. Some well over 10,000 mph I don't believe that if a human was piloting that vehicle he would stay in control of it. The brain simply cannot process that amount of information in such a short period of time. If I were to travel 1000 miles in a few seconds, it would have to almost seem instant to me. And at the rate they turn, the amount of G's inflicted on the body would be devastating to us.

So either we have some truly remarkable pilots, or these are some sort of UAVs, but the evidence for ETs is overwhelming even just from that second video I posted.

It's just my opinion, but I believe that there is enough evidence out there to seriously consider life outside of Earth.

As I've said many times before, ANYONE who repeatedly keeps filming apparent UFOs is a fraud, Urzi and this Woods guy, fake.

Originally posted by goldcoin

If I were to travel 1000 miles in a few seconds, it would have to almost seem instant to me. And at the rate they turn, the amount of G's inflicted on the body would be devastating to us.

They wouldn't have to be manned, they could do it by computer and I wouldn't be surprised if there was secret tech craft that could achieve, get close to or exceed that speed.

Originally posted by goldcoin

It's just my opinion, but I believe that there is enough evidence out there to seriously consider life outside of

I agree with you when you say there has to be life elsewhere, it's just that (and sometimes I feel like a stuck record saying this, younger people do a search on what a vinyl record is) I don't quite believe they've visited us yet as there's nothing conclusive to prove it and considering the amount of claims regarding abductions e.c.t there really should be, but no, no d.n.a samples, no alien artifacts, no spaceship debri, I still look to the skies often though. The evidence that exists right now is not proof to me that aliens have visited but it's enough to maintain my interest in the subject.

I do 100 percent believe you saw that craft though, I just don't know if it was alien as there are more likely explanations.

Gah....I'm so sick of shaky video. I understand you're not going to run around with a full tripod set up etc., but come on. Rest the camera on a fence, the fender of the car, anything stable! Interesting footage in places, but due to the overall quality and instability, we'll never really get good analysis of what was filmed.

Hey guys thanks for the links, ive not seen both those so ive had a real good day watching all that footage, Do you know of anything like that thats more recent? this all all from 2002 and round abouts, im wondering weather the 'Journey' has a part 2 or 3 or 4 lol. Yes i agree some of those filmers who keep getting stuff are deffinate fakers, but i can find nothing wrong with Barker and his brother in laws footage in the 'Journey' seems honest enough and all different.

What a shame that someone would consider this video some of the best UFO evidence ever. Oh wait, I said it wrong. Let me sensationalize it for you: Some of the Best UFO Video Evidence...EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I went ahead and added the few extra exclamation marks, as everyone knows the more capitol letters you use, follow by bombast punctuation the better the material MUST be!!!! (see, I did it again!!!!)

I think the lack of critical thinking that accepts without serious and LOGICAL questioning this evidence (that you regard is the best video evidence ever) is why this subject is in the sad state that it is in.

Perhaps if we didn't waste our time consuming idiotic things like this, there would actually be better evidence in droves for us to ponder. But as long as folks are titillated with what is currently out there, no one will push it even further to get more and better evidence.

Seriously, think about what I just said. Let it sink in.

Originally posted by etdownunder
pause the video at 31:28 and you will see the object magically appears in front of the trees where 1 second earlier in appears to be 1000's of feet in the air. FAKE FAKE FAKE

i paused it at 31.28 and it was behind the branch.
then i play-paused it real quick 3 times in that 1 second and it was behind every time.
when you pause a video it can stop on different frames of film in the same second.
i dont know how many frames there are in 1 second of film, but you will see it differently on every one
so you need to do a screen-grab of what you are stating so we all can see.
try pausing it again and again on 31.28 and i bet you get a different picture everytime

best UFO evidence is the one you personally see for yourself but those are some good bits of evidence

Thee are camcorders with zoom ratios up to 70, more or less, and I'm wondering what such camcorders would show but they would have to be anchored of course or the shake would be more than one would want.