Israel no match for Iran military might

page: 2
22
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 04:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Tw0Sides
 


well Afghanistan is ranked 51 on this list, America ranked 1.....




posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 04:38 PM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 




I take it he wasn't with the pro-democracy movement,that is tired of Iranian hardline corruption,and Supreme leadership.
edit on 4-2-2012 by sonnny1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 04:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by MissSinFull
reply to post by Tw0Sides
 


well Afghanistan is ranked 51 on this list, America ranked 1.....

And who was in charge when the US entered.

And who was in charge when the US left.



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 04:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by StratosFear
The blood spilled in middle east has long washed away anything Divine. Let them fight over dead land, Israel/Palestine has got to be cursed by now anyways.

How many throughout history have died there because it was "God`s Will"?


The thing about this is that so many (Christians included - and I know Jehovah's Witnesses use this argument also) assume that the reunification of Israel in 1948 means that Israel is a "godly state".

This isn't the case either practically or biblically. The Bible presents a scenario where Christ's return results not simply in a Kingdom on earth, but also in a judgement. Israel is judged not only for her rejection of Christ (which is the primary reason why the gentiles have been allowed into the Kingdom of God) but also for her rebellion in the years since. Zecharaiah tells us that 2/3 of all of Israel will die in this judgement.

It isn't until after that period that Israel actually lives in a manner that is pleasing to God.

So... (not that this is the question you asked)

Don't mistake the reunification of Israel as a sign that God is honouring Israel.
...it's just God aligning the chess pieces on the board.



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 04:42 PM
link   
Left? what are you talking about? we are still their, hell most of the solders that left Iraq just went to Afghanistan
by the way are you trying to make some point?



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 04:43 PM
link   
Its just a matter of time, the end result is soo predictable......
The Isrealis wont attack Iran......They cannot...There are so many missiles pointed at the country, they would cover every square foot of habitable land if let go at one time....
the isrealis have to worry about Diamona, even though its been colled off for the duration, its still vulnerable to targetting, and the resulting contamination can be just as deadly as a bomb..
I really cant see the attack comming from Isreal,though theres still a chance of saudi/Isreali alliance on the QT.
This sounds unlikely but isnt all that far fetched...the enemy of my enemy is my friend.......
Saudi airspace would be a shortcut for a strike on Iran.....
a safe place to crash if shot down maybe.....
The Saudis and iranians will be at each others throats sooner or later.....



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 04:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Tw0Sides

Originally posted by MissSinFull
reply to post by Tw0Sides
 


well Afghanistan is ranked 51 on this list, America ranked 1.....

And who was in charge when the US entered.

And who was in charge when the US left.


...not to mention how long did it last? How many technologically advanced Americans did the cave dwellers murder?



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 04:50 PM
link   
reply to post by RizeorDie
 


(wipe tears)


Oh that was good. I needed a good laugh. Got anymore?



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 04:50 PM
link   
Israels airforce alone is way stronger than Iran.What planet do people live on today.



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 04:51 PM
link   
No their military should have cyborg sentinels and space ships with all the money that gets pumped into their defense.
At least a couple terminators, maybe even a robocop or two.

The size or strength doesn't matter. It is ridiculous to think that they have any chance against their combined enemies /neighbors. If their enemies were far removed, OK. Maybe. There is just not enough land. It is a city state in global terms. Its like troy in a nuclear modern age. W T H !

You can have what ever stuff you like, but in the end you are sitting in a pot hole. Its dumb. Their foreign policy just shows how they are making their citizens the target of so many dangers. It is obvious that having a long lasting relationship with at least one ally along your borders is just sane. You can't just "make" them.

Israel could have become like a Vatican. Safe and neutral. The Palestinians could have enriched them as a people. They could have forged lasting friendships of mutual benefit with anyone of the people they made enemies. It was the government that did this.

The people are being constantly fed lies and hype until they are in a state of constant frenzy. They take any attack on the Big Brother state as an attack on a triple combo of people/ race /religion. Even if it is a sane argument against another governments policy.

Not one person is an anti-semite for speaking to the truths of a government. If something is a lie, then it is not protected by the virtue of honor. A good peoples identity should not be used as a golden ticket to hurt them and others for the benefit of a select few.

Theft of another's property is for the coward too scared to find his way. War in your name is done in the name of your weakness. War for theft is for the weak coward. Wars for weakness, and cowards. Theft and death.

The jewish people are now in bondage under the Israeli government. It will all work out in the end. I do beleive it is the way of things to find balance.



edit on 4-2-2012 by casenately because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 04:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Tw0Sides
 


Oh right. I called it solomon option earlier. Oops. A sociological metaphor. Samson....

There a couple of books by the same name, "The Samson Option."



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 05:08 PM
link   
books.google.ca...=onepage&q=%22T he%20samson%20option%22&f=false

Page 152


Israel has the type of relatively low-yield tactical nuclear weapons that can be selectively fired to eliminate specific targets. Low-yield 'tactical nukes' could be used to hit the type of hardened underground centrifuge farm which Iran has built at Natanz to enrich uranium.


There are some description of the Syrians going at it with the Israelis airforce, and essentially getting wiped out. 80 dog fights, with Israel losing none.

There is a reason why the Islamic countries use guerrilla warfare. It allows them to make people with down syndrome or they've raped into martyr-walking-bombs and not have to spend money on training people who suck with expensive equipment.
edit on 2012/2/4 by Aeons because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 05:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Aeons


There is a reason why the Islamic countries use guerrilla warfare. It allows them to make people with down syndrome or they've raped into martyr-walking-bombs and not have to spend money on training people who suck with expensive equipment.
edit on 2012/2/4 by Aeons because: (no reason given)


Cant wait for someone to try and disprove this........

Star for ya.........



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 05:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Aeons
There is a reason why the Islamic countries use guerrilla warfare. It allows them to make people with down syndrome or they've raped into martyr-walking-bombs and not have to spend money on training people who suck with expensive equipment.
edit on 2012/2/4 by Aeons because: (no reason given)

So let me get this Straight.

Your siding with Israel because there may be a chance Iran will develope a nuke, and then may use it against Israel.
Iran is threatening Israels existence.

Now Israel , who Has Nukes, Throught the Samson Option, IS Threatening every Major City of every Country

that they can hit, and that sits well with you.



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 05:20 PM
link   
reply to post by Aeons
 


Its funny how many civilians were willing to fight against a US backed Iraq though not so long ago in the past. The Iranians will put up a good show. Put Iraq and Afghanistan together (think of the landscape as well) and you have Iran. The only difference is the Iranians have a better defence with better weapons.



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 05:21 PM
link   
Israel can fight dirty. It seems to me they have the upper hand here. Whats gonna happen if Iran drops a nuke on Israel? Some of Islam's favorite sites Vaporized? Christian sites vaporized? Jewish sites vaporized? The whole world against you. Another sensless war for greed, TPTB dont want Iran in the nuclear energy game.



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 05:24 PM
link   
They've had that option since the 1940s. Old news. They aren't planning on taking out the whole world. Again, please go back up and read the description of what most of their arsenal is.

I am not siding with Israel. I have no dog there. Islam has a reaction to Jews that is a form of xenophobia. Israel is a small small place. They should just STFU, and concentrate on something productive. But that doesn't suit the leaders of the Islamic world. They don't want productive - they want control.

They are living on dreams, and if they'd stop for a bit and get their arses into the modern world and out of their ancient world we could move beyond this stupidity.

Again, Iran would be rich beyond imagining if their leaders were not tools.



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 05:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Aeons
I am not siding with Israel.
Again, Iran would be rich beyond imagining if their leaders were not tools.

A lot of countries would be rich beyond if their leaders werent tools.

You sure bash the Muslims,Persians a lot for a guy with no dog in the race, along with your Huckleberries.



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 05:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Redevilfan09
reply to post by Aeons
 


Its funny how many civilians were willing to fight against a US backed Iraq though not so long ago in the past. The Iranians will put up a good show. Put Iraq and Afghanistan together (think of the landscape as well) and you have Iran. The only difference is the Iranians have a better defence with better weapons.



I have no idea what you are talking about. The Iraq thing was a mistake, but under the circumstances if they managed to get the Iraqis to stop screwing up their fields, I take a long long long term view of it. It'll probably add to the long term stability of the World for them not to have fields that could last 500 years being utterly destroyed by incompetent idiots.

(shrug) I don't agree with how they went about it.



posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 05:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Tw0Sides

Originally posted by Aeons
I am not siding with Israel.
Again, Iran would be rich beyond imagining if their leaders were not tools.

A lot of countries would be rich beyond if their leaders werent tools.

You sure bash the Muslims,Persians a lot for a guy with no dog in the race, along with your Huckleberries.


I ain't a guy, so I have no huckleberries at all.





new topics
 
22
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join