It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by XPLodER
or better yet LEARN the acual issiues,
Fair enough... How did the siege and holding of Israeli consulate staff as hostages fit in with the "actual issues" of ows?
Originally posted by charles1952
Are these the images OWS wants to be on the media outlets? Or is it time to consider a new strategy. From an outsider's viewpoint (Defined as someone who doesn't get angry at either side and has never been to a camp.) this occupy strategy seems to be getting old. OWS moves in, there's a little press, and the police move them out. I mean, where is this going?
Fair enough... How did the siege and holding of Israeli consulate staff as hostages fit in with the "actual issues" of ows?
Originally posted by theBigToe
Sorry.
I find it hard to stand behind protesters that break the law by breaking and entering private properties and illegally taking up residence in public areas.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by XPLodER
Its not peaceful or lawful when you illegally occupy a space not beloning to you. Its not lawful or peaceful when you destroy private / public property. Its not peaceful or lawful when you don't allow people out of a location.
Unlawfully depriving an individual of their freedom of movement is in fact taking a hostage and if done for a specific time period is kidnapping.
There is no excuse you can offer that would make their actions legal and doing so only makes you look desperate to defnd them for your own agenda.edit on 5-2-2012 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Cancerwarrior
reply to post by Pirateofpsychonautics
The fact that they're name-calling and spinning things around tells me that they are trying hard to paint this movement as some kind of loserfest that is accomplishing nothing at all
Originally posted by Cancerwarrior
And when the MM says enough times that occupiers are dirty lazy dregs of society(or domestic terrorists) and the majority of Americans believe it unquestioningly, thats when the real crackdown/mass arrests/FEMA camps will begin
Originally posted by XPLodER
at no point in ANY of the videos i saw was any person HELD or TOUCHED or BLOCKED or INTIMIDATED
you are mistaken,
Originally posted by XPLodER
LISTEN TO YOURSELF, people sitting on the floor in the reception is not threatning behaviour, it is not taking hostages, you are being dramatic and silly, these people were a THREAT to NO ONE, and when acually asked they left so pretty much NOT dangerous lol
Originally posted by XPLodER
how about their right to leave when asked to lol
Originally posted by XPLodER
i mean if it was a problem why were they simply not ased to leave?
Originally posted by XPLodER
and then when they were asked to leave they did
hardly holding some one hostage when a simple pleasent request to leave is adherad to
Originally posted by XPLodER
wake up noddy,
this is not terrorism, kidnapism, or what ever else you claim.
Originally posted by XPLodER
this was a very respectful pieceful protest,
the only part i can critique is the fact they are on private property,
instead of at a public park
Originally posted by XPLodER
but as absolutly NON OF THEM WERE ARESSTED FOR A CRIME,
Originally posted by XPLodER
i consider your opinion to be just that, uninformed opinon
xploder
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by petrus4
Why put pressure on the Police? They have nothing at all to do with the issues ows has.
Pressuring the police in order to gain economic change?
Originally posted by Pirateofpsychonautics
Give it a rest! You, here are using the same tactic of fear as the mainstream media! FEAR! Show me the FEMA detention camp plans, if you can't then it's just speculation!
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by XPLodER
at no point in ANY of the videos i saw was any person HELD or TOUCHED or BLOCKED or INTIMIDATED
you are mistaken,
The actions of the protesters violated diplomatic protocol. Their actions prevented consulate staff from entering or leaving the site. The protesters were inside the consulate. When you get time feel free to look up the PA statute on what constitutes intimidation.
I am telling you how the law works in the US. Any particular reason you are so insistent on excusing criminal behavior? I mean you obviously support the OWS movement since your here defending them. How exactly can you identify with OWS while at the same time condone their illegal actions? Kind of hypocritical dont you think?
Originally posted by XPLodER
i mean if it was a problem why were they simply not ased to leave?
The point you are missing is they should not have been their in the first place. It doesnt belong to them nor does it belong to the US. The consulate is under the control of the Israli government.
Originally posted by XPLodER
wake up noddy,
this is not terrorism, kidnapism, or what ever else you claim.
Its NOT peaceful when you force your way into a foreign consulate while chanting and screaming and refusing to leave.
Actually arrests were made at the Israeli consulate in Boston. Actually arrests were made at the Isreali embassy in San Francisco for the exact same thing - OWS people storming the consulate and acting like asshats.
No.... not opinion, but fact. I consider your stance on this as being naieve, condoning violence / illegal actions by OWS while arguing the people OWS affected should be the ones to back down. You have absolutely no idea how State / Federal law works in the US, and you are using your lack of knowledge in those areas to make a failed argument in an effort to somehow justify the actions of these clowns.
Originally posted by XPLodER
Im sorry I didnt realize you were an expert on Us Domestic law. By all means tell me how their actions dont meet the criteria.