It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1
Originally posted by Aesop
I think you have a follower TrueAmerican, the bag is out of the cat!
Question, did the pattern look anything like this?
There are few places if any safe from natural disasters. Just always have an emergency plan and take it as it comes.
If you don’t mind me asking how rare is this inclusion of quakes for that sector?
Have there been past post large eruptions associated with the plot you linked in your post?
Aesop
edit on 5-2-2012 by Aesop because: (no reason given)edit on 5-2-2012 by Aesop because: correctionedit on 5-2-2012 by Aesop because: (no reason given)edit on 5-2-2012 by Aesop because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
reply to post by PuterMan
It was there long before you posted. You just didn't see it.
Either that or it took you 10 minutes to make your last post. WHATEVER!
Rofl, I really don't care either, you know me better than that.
One problem right away though is that I can't be everywhere at once. Not to this depth I can't. Been studying another area, when all of a sudden Cascadia decides to act up. So I am trying to jump in there, but I just don't have the in depth study I need there yet, to be able to differentiate between some things.
And honestly, no offense to anyone, but seeing as I am living a whole lot closer to the New Madrid, and that is more of our problem over here in the east- I may direct my efforts more towards there, or even Charleston, SC area.
And oh, as far as someone else not noticing yet, I'm sure glad they didn't stop when they were trying to invent the lightbulb, or increase the accuracy of weather forecasting, for example.
Point is, I am not going to say defeat before even trying. So how about encouraging instead of discouraging?
Originally posted by CoolStoryMan
Oh god here goes TrueAmerican again.
Look we appreciate your insights, but stop crying wolf at the sight of every earthquake, you've done it so many times it hurts your credibility. it's not going to rupture, stop trying to scare people
Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by TrueAmerican
There are reasons why a big one may be due for Cascadia but a change in frequency is not being exhibited at present in fact more worryingly the frequency is decreasing.
This chart is Mag 4,5+ from 2002 to about 2 weeks ago. The area covered is:
West Of Vancouver Island
Queen Charlotte Islands Region
British Columbia. Canada
Alberta. Canada
Vancouver Island. Canada Region
Off Coast Of Washington
Near Coast Of Washington
Washington-Oregon Border Region
Washington
Off Coast Of Oregon
Near Coast Of Oregon
Oregon
Western Idaho
Off Coast Of Northern California
Near Coast Of Northern Calif.
Northern California
as defined by elements of FE regions 2 and 3
The Data is from ANSS.
Originally posted by CoolStoryMan
Oh god here goes TrueAmerican again.
Look we appreciate your insights, but stop crying wolf at the sight of every earthquake, you've done it so many times it hurts your credibility. it's not going to rupture, stop trying to scare people