It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by marinesniper0351
reply to post by rainbowbear
The only negative effect I can think of it a big one, the de-population of Earth.
If 200 years ago everyone where gay, society as we know it would not exist. If the devine or nature intended on homosexuality to be normal than men would be able to reproduce with other men and woman with woman.
Since this is not the case one can only speculate that homosexuality is not what nature intended, thus un-natural. Please do not reply with invetro fertilization yada yada, homo sexuality has been around over 1000 years before the science existed to allow the same sex to have children via a donor mother (key word MOTHER, not FATHER)...
Again I am not anti-gay, I wish and pray to Allah more men were gay so there would be more woman for me available... : ) I personally recommend as many men go gay as possible, I cheer at gay pride parades, off course for my own selfish reasons...I am just a man at the end of the day...
Originally posted by yourboycal2
I have no problem with gay people ,
only thing i really dislike ,
is two dudes making out in public areas.
Originally posted by Puzzuzu
reply to post by Destinyone
It's foolish to think that gay culture only holds the right to the colours of the rainbow, and by attacking the ops name and calling it gay is bigotry in itself. Fine, the colours of the rainbow can be 'used' to promote gay ideologies, but you cant claim them to be exclusively for the homosexual community. If anything, they represent psychedelic culture just as much, if not more.