Pictures: Civil War Sub H.L. Hunley Finally Revealed, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 3-2-2012 @ 04:35 PM by speculativeoptimist

For the first time since the U.S. Civil War, the Confederate vessel H.L. Hunley—the world's first submarine to sink an enemy ship—was revealed on January 12 (pictured) after 11 years of conservation work.

Shown in a South Carolina conservation facility, the Hunley sank the U.S.S. Housatonic off Charleston (map) in 1864. Within minutes the sub itself sank too-killing its eight-man crew and creating an enduring mystery.

This sub was built in 1863 and was the nations first submarine. It was privately funded by Park and Lyons of Mobile, Alabama. The crew consisted of 9 men, 8 for propulsion and 1 for steering. The sub had 2 ballasts for buoyancy and they were hand pumped.

In 1864 the sun was used to attack the USS Housatonic off the coast of S. Carolina.
with spar torpedo packed with explosive powder and attached to a long pole on its bow. The spar torpedo embedded in the sloop's wooden side was detonated by a rope as Hunley backed away. The resulting explosion that sent Housatonic with five crew members to the bottom of Charleston Harbor also sank Hunley with its crew of eight. H.L. Hunley earned a place in the history of undersea warfare as the first submarine to sink a ship in wartime.


Naval engineers still marvel at the Hunley's design and construction. For example, the ship's knifelike, rolled-iron hull and recessed rivets helped reduce drag as the sub cut through the water.


Driven by 136 years of chemical reactions between salt water and the Hunley's iron hull, concretions lend a rough appearance to the rear hatch (pictured with its cap removed) and to much of the rest of the Civil War submarine.

The concretions will provide valuable information about what happened to the submarine after it had sunk in 1864, according to archaeologist Maria Jacobsen. Already the concretions suggest that natural forces alternately covered and uncovered the sunken Hunley with silt.



The 40-foot-long (12-meter-long) Hunley had two ballast tanks—one front, one rear—which could be filled with water to submerge the submarine. Crewmen manually pumped out the water to rise again.


At only about 4 feet (122 centimeters) tall and 2 feet (61 centimeters) wide, the interior of the Hunley was so cramped that its eight crewmen couldn't trade places after they'd taken their stations. (See "Hunley Findings Put Faces on Civil War Submarine.")

During a mission, seven men sat on a long-gone wooden bench on one side of the craft and turned a crankshaft (visible above) to power the Hunley's propeller.

The handles on the crankshaft were arranged in a staggered fashion, so that all crewmen weren't applying maximum force at the same times. The arrangement kept the propeller turning smoothly and kept the Hunley from lurching.

The eighth crewmember was the submarine's commander, who stood at a small conning tower with small glass windows at the front of the Hunley. The commander steered the sub via a rudder and controlled horizontal fins that helped the Hunley dive and surface.

Man, only 34 feet long, can you imagine being in that thing? I thought of the movie Das Boot and the German Uboats(one of the best movies ever btw), but this seems just as frightening for a crew member.

The Hunley's crankshaft operators (such as this one shown in a diagram) entered one by one and crawled or duck-walked through the submarine to take their positions. The commander was the last to enter.

When the submarine was recovered and opened in 2000, archaeologists discovered that the eight crewmen had died at their stations. There was no indication that the crewmen had tried to escape.

Archaeologists think the men passed out and eventually suffocated as the air inside the submarine was used up.

Photographs by Randall Hill, Reuters
Source

spec


reply posted on 3-2-2012 @ 04:52 PM by speculativeoptimist
reply to post by On the level


Yes, for 1863 wow! I wonder what the crew of the U.S.S. Housatonic thought when they saw this thing rise up?!
What an interesting idea too, the 'spar torpedo.' Too bad they were unable to back away in time.

Thanks for the reply,
spec


reply posted on 3-2-2012 @ 05:03 PM by speculativeoptimist
reply to post by Asktheanimals


Hey there ATA, yea war provides a pretty good 'necessity' for invention I reckon. I wonder if claustrophobia was recognized back then. That would be one hell of a setting to first realize it in!

Thanks for the reply,
spec


reply posted on 3-2-2012 @ 05:17 PM by speculativeoptimist
reply to post by ZeroUnlmtd



Just following the article, but it is cool you got to see it. Did they honor the crew in any way? I am sure they did, but I hope the families and crew were honored.

Peace,
spec


reply posted on 3-2-2012 @ 06:48 PM by speculativeoptimist
reply to post by redoubt



It's just a matter of locating and focusing on a single subdivision that allows us to recognize unique moments in history when they are worth the glance.

Agreed, and seeing this sub for the first time really transports one back to that era and event for a moment, which for me, draws admiration to it's ingenuity, and the men who manned the vessel.

spec


reply posted on 4-2-2012 @ 01:27 PM by speculativeoptimist
reply to post by SoulVisions



Thanks for the additional info SV, what a horrible way to go other than sacrificing oneself for a greater cause. But man, packed like sardines with only candlelight and the deep sea beneath you, wow.

spec
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Eglin Air Force Base hangar Foam Party!
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
Space weapons / Anonymous / Afghan War plan
  Posted 7 days ago with 4 member flags
What were those sounds in the sky? - Explained
  Posted 1 days ago with 4 member flags
Reports of Rumbling in the Sky: Pulsejet Technology?
  Posted 17 days ago with 3 member flags