It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
He describes Israel as a "cancer" and says, "It will be cut."
Khamenei, who has final say on all state matters, says that Iran has helped the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas in their fights against Israel, and will aid others who do so.
link
"Such sanctions will benefit us. They will make us more self-reliant ... We would not achieve military progress if sanctions were not imposed on Iran's military sector ... More imposed pressures mean more self-reliance for Iran. Sanctions are beneficial also because it makes us more determined not to change our nuclear course ... Iran will not change its nuclear course because of sanctions...,"he added.
Today, while delivering a hate-filled speech to radicals in Iran filled with double-talk and rhetoric, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei appears to have slipped up.
What country’s military runs its nuclear program for public energy production??
Originally posted by duality90
I don't see why Israel should command American foreign policy, but I must say ... if Iran truly is hoping to become a nuclear power, then that is something which should be prevented. I don't know if at all cost, but one must weigh up the impact of an attack on Iran with the potentially seriously destabilising influence Iran could have in the region as a nuclear power. Their sunni neighbours dislike them and it is not unforeseeable to think that it could get ugly.
I was never for a strike Iran and I still think it should be the last option, but I must say, I was rather amused when I learnt/read that their 'civilian' projects are being built inside of mountains and bunkers ... surrounded by anti-aircraft batteries? That doesn't strike me as being the actions of a nation with nothing to hide.
If they wanted nuclear energy (does Iran even need civilian nuclear energy when it has so much cheap fossil fuel to run its power plants?) for civil purposes, I think that would be commendable, but this attitude of 'no, sorry, we're not letting inspectors in' ... surely they too must realize that it sets them on a collision course with the West and even their regional neighbours.
Sorry but that doesn't convince me one bit.
I believe his statements about military sanctions and their nuclear program to be two different points.
Not to mention the real possibility of his intention to be lost in translation.
You have obviously made up you're mind and that is fine but I think you are reading a little too much into this one statement.
BTW I see you've been practicing your own propaganda... good job.
Originally posted by xuenchen
Assuming Iran actually has nuke weapons intentions,
How is the "West' going to benefit financially from stopping the program ?
I think there is a higher agenda at work.
The nuke thing may be just hype.
The "West" wants more 'business" in Iran.
Too much destruction may kill the possibilities.
Originally posted by cconn487
What country’s military runs its nuclear program for public energy production??
None. And thats the problem. While its certainly plausible, I really do not think Iran wants to build weapon that will insure its destruction from outside forces.
I really don't think anyone in power in Iran is saying, yeah lets build a nuke and use it and get our 10 second victory before we get wiped off the face of the earth. Is it a possibility? Sure. But logically I don't see that many people standing behind a plan like that. But who knows, the world is a crazy place this past decade.
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
If Iran gets Oil and Nuclear Power that is shifting the power in the region from Israel to Iran. Now I ask everyone here, Do you really want that? Just consider who's in charge over there.
Originally posted by theBigToe
Irans a threat to the whole world. Were not all brainwashed by the Muslim propaganda, but unfortunately it is winning the propaganda battle.
Originally posted by cconn487
Originally posted by theBigToe
Irans a threat to the whole world. Were not all brainwashed by the Muslim propaganda, but unfortunately it is winning the propaganda battle.
Just like Saddam and his weapons of mass destruction. How was the need to take Iraq down any different than Iran now?
Was Saddam a bad guy? Sure, I'll go with that. He wasn't a good person by many standards. The only propaganda I see these days is Iran has to be dealt with just like Saddam had to be taken out. Ask the civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan how much our intervention helped them. The Taliban is stronger than ever. We took out Osama, big deal! There are 20 more ready to take his place who will take things to the next level.
The only propaganda I see is an inevitable intervening in Iran. At the request of Israel.
I don't see why Israel should command American foreign policy, but I must say ... if Iran truly is hoping to become a nuclear power, then that is something which should be prevented. I don't know if at all cost, but one must weigh up the impact of an attack on Iran with the potentially seriously destabilising influence Iran could have in the region as a nuclear power.
I was never for a strike Iran and I still think it should be the last option, but I must say, I was rather amused when I learnt/read that their 'civilian' projects are being built inside of mountains and bunkers ... surrounded by anti-aircraft batteries? That doesn't strike me as being the actions of a nation with nothing to hide.
If they wanted nuclear energy (does Iran even need civilian nuclear energy when it has so much cheap fossil fuel to run its power plants?) for civil purposes, I think that would be commendable, but this attitude of 'no, sorry, we're not letting inspectors in' ... surely they too must realize that it sets them on a collision course with the West and even their regional neighbours.
Originally posted by xuenchen
Assuming Iran actually has nuke weapons intentions,
How is the "West' going to benefit financially from stopping the program ?
I think there is a higher agenda at work.
The nuke thing may be just hype.
The "West" wants more 'business" in Iran.
Too much destruction may kill the possibilities.
We’ve all heard the threats, like...
And his admission that Iran supports terrorist acts against Israel and others...
Today, while delivering a hate-filled speech to radicals in Iran filled with double-talk and rhetoric...
Sanctions against Iran's military sector??? That sounded to me like he’s admitting Iran’s nuclear program is for military purposes. What country’s military runs its nuclear program for public energy production??
I’m wondering when some of you “smart” people sticking to your guns on Iran will finally connect the dots??