posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 04:21 AM
reply to post by rbnhd76
Today i am going to try and spell it out.....no pun intended, I however am stuck here in doing so because i get grief either way because if i show you
the dots that i feel are connected it means posting links, links that i know many wont be even bothered to read in full, then come back with a
ridiculous reply or complain about the bombardment of links.
On the other hand i could do what i have done and put the pieces that i feel are relevant into place on the thread in the hope you can think for
yourselves and hopefully come up with the same thought about it as i have. Now the person i am replying to here, has. There is a few other people here
on ATS see what i am getting at, admittedly it is hard to show, mainly because people continue to skimp over threads, not reading all posts before
posting. It happens all the time on ATS.
A title for a thread and the opening post is written, on say page 6 an important piece of evidence is brought into light yet on page 8 ATS members
start replying having only read the OP and maybe a couple of replies at a stretch. Then you all know what is next. The thread is doomed because what
was an informative thread and discussion turns into a one of trying to find the good informative bits from countless pages of dumb as replies,
trolling and derailing.
I promise you all this right now. I will re-write this thread and "TRY" to share what i believe to be a connection of Biblical proportions, i am not
saying that it is fact, or what i am saying is fact. I am putting it up here on ATS because it just "might" be or it might be "fact" that it is sheer
ALL I ASK IS THAT YOU READ MY THREAD IN FULL, WORD FOR WORD, LINK FOR LINK AND ONLY REPLY IF INTERESTED IN THE TOPICS RELATED TO THE
THREAD. IS THAT TO MUCH TO ASK FOR IN RETURN?Text
Can i ask Moderators to perhaps allow me to post a new thread in regard to this topic and hopefully i can do a better job this time, and when i have
delete this one? Or to stop posts to this thread while i do?
edit on 4-2-2012 by jazz10 because: (no reason given)