It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Chemtrails are real.

page: 6
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in


posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 09:52 PM
reply to post by Phage

That would be a yes

posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 10:02 PM
reply to post by JackDaniels90

See also: China Olympics 2008, cloud seeding

You do know that they used rockets right?

Clouds were seeded during the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing using rockets,[7] so that there would be no rain during the opening and closing ceremonies.[8] although others dispute their claims of success

So how do chemtrails relate to cloud seeding when they both happen at different altitudes?

posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 10:20 PM
reply to post by tsurfer2000h

Hey, your forum signature and information has a ring to it!

posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 05:19 AM
AH i feel bad I've fallen behind!!! damn working for a living haha j/k

just for the record i do not believe that nefarious forces are spraying chemicals on us for nefarious reasons.... and id like to think they wouldn't be so obvious about it if they were.

but i do like to deliberate and i find a lot of these conspiracies to be entertaining.....

Phage thank you for teaching me Doppler radar can work in the x band, i did some quick searching and found some radar screens that show "chemtrails" with someone who is really convinced in the whole chemtrail idea.


The upper atmosphere data that correlates to the date and time of most of the Doppler images indicate that conditions for persistent contrail formation are not present in the atmospheric profile.


posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 10:55 AM
reply to post by JackDaniels90

Here is a post I made a while ago on this very subject. This is but one example, but when I repeat the process, the result is the same.

Originally posted by waynos
Further to my previous post, today I saw two planes crossing paths in a clear sky. This is the sort of sighting that is so beloved of chemtrail believers. They say that airliners don't cross paths and if planes do its is a sign they are sprayers. Though there is no explanation of why sprayers would need to cross.

A perfect opportunity then to put this theory to the test. This is what I saw;

Zooming in, so that I might identify them better this was the view.

firstly travelling across my line of sight in a Northerly direction;

And then travelling directly along my line of sight, facing West

Flightglobal Atlas again showed only two possible links in my area, with the rest of the sky being completely clear both on screen and in reality, as follows.

Registration G-EUYC
Hex Code 405EE0
Manufacturer Airbus
Type A320
Model A320-232
Serial 3721
Flight number SHT6T
Operator British Airways
Speed 375kts.
Origin London, Heathrow
Destination Glasgow, Abbotsinch

Registration N780UA
Hex Code AA9249
Manufacturer Boeing
Type B772
Model B777-222
Serial 26944
Flight number UAL903
Operator United Airlines
Speed 388kts.
Origin Munich, Franz Josef Strauss
Destination Washington, Dulles International

At first I suspected failure as the rather blurry dark blue hull of the A320 was recognisable, but the United 777 looked completely the wrong colour.

However a google for the term United 777 revealed that I was simply out of touch, witness here;

And so there we have it. Two unrelated commercial flights, one Intercontinental and one domestic, making a cross in the sky.

Glad to be of service

So, not only 'not chemtrails', but not cloud seeding either, just air travel.
edit on 4-2-2012 by waynos because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 10:59 AM
reply to post by Majestyka

I wonder, were visual observations of "chemtrails" made at the time?
Or, perhaps something like this was occurring.

posted on Feb, 4 2012 @ 09:04 PM
reply to post by Phage


love this stuff, good find my friend good find!

i suppose pictures of the sky to go with the Doppler radar screens would be perfect if not convenient but as I have learned; most of these "believers" only believe in what fits their theories haha

new topics

top topics

<< 3  4  5   >>

log in