reply to post by PlentyoTool
We want to discuss the software he uses and what filtering he does, he chooses not to discuss that so we have nothing to discuss. If science never
revealed their methods peer review would be impossible and then you can say the science is subjective. But science reveals their methods so proper
analysis can be undertaken by other parties to see if the results are genuine, or flaws in data entry, or data analysis exist, or to see if others get
repeatable results.
I do know one thing, jpeg images are flattened, there are no layers. History of manipulation cannot be traced from a flattened jpeg. The very fact the
image is a jpeg means it has been manipulated. Analysis of such is poppycock. Two, no, less than one minute into his video is the very kind of
artifacts jpeg image processing creates, so anything after that time was a waste of time to listen to. (He doesn't even have Adobe Photoshop).
The processing is subjective creation through imagination, nothing more.
edit on 2-2-2012 by Illustronic because: (no reason given)