November of 1996 Vincent Marino was shot in the lower back in Revere, Massachusetts and taken to Massachusetts General Hospital and had surgery to
remove the bullet, while law enforcement officers looked on. About a month later, he and a buddy were arrested at an airport and charged with drug
trafficking allegations. Now here is where it gets interesting Marino alleges that, after his arrest, a federal agent (ROBERTO FDEA) approached him to
sign a consent form to remove a bio chip device from his body, which they had used to track him. Marino refused to sign. A subsequent x-ray would
later find that there was some type of foreign object in his abdomen. As you can see the FDEA had bio chipped Marino to track him. The problem is they
violated Mr. Marino's Civil rights by placing a bio chip in Marino's lower back. Now Marino wants an MRI at his own Expense to prove the FDEA had
chipped him. The problem is he is in the FED PEN and they will not let him get an MRI. NOW if they let him get a MRI this will prove that the
Government/FDEA ETC chipped Marino to track his movement's in the Late 90S. The Government says bio chip technology did not exist in the late 90's
and Vincent Marino is crazy. If he is crazy like they claim why wont they let him get an MRI at his own Expense? Marino filed complaints with the
feds, who did some due diligence and determined that the federal agent was joking around with Marino during his arrest in telling him that they had
biochip'ed him. Marino also filed an earlier lawsuit about the alleged implantation of a biochip, but it was dismissed by a federal court.
It appears that Marino has been housed in federal prison for more than 10 years while waiting for a simple MRI to be done that would further prove --
or refute -- the existence of some type of bio chip in his body. If a bio chip is there, one would have to wonder that his conviction would be
overturned as a violation of his civil rights. Since the defendants/agencies already submitted on public record "DOCUMENT #13" and stipulated that
the records Marino seeks DO IN FACT EXIST, they essentially let the cat out of the bag.
This discovery must be handed over to Marino, as it is in the "PUBLIC DOMAIN" and has facilitated a core and substantial Public Interest."
See New York Times article dated June 20, 1999, showing that Marino requests an MRI test exam to his entire body at Marino's expense to ascertain
whether the defendants/agencies/government covertly implanted Marino while Marino was placed under general anesthesia for a "ruse" laparoscopic
exploratory surgery and bullet removal while at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts on November 24, 1996, without Marino's
valid consent and without a valid court warrant, in support. Moreover the agencies/defendants cannot legally cover up a historic and current criminal
and civil conspiracy which violates numerous federal and state statutory laws. See 18 U.S.C. Sections 241 and 242, (Civil Rights violations and
conspiracy to violate rights; 1001(Filing False Reports) , 501-505 (Obstruction of Justice); 1621 (Perjury)
Marino has a new lawsuit check out the link Filed April 29,2011:
www.scribd.com...
www.laborlawtalk.com...
www.youtube.com...
weblogs.baltimoresun.com...