It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by aravoth
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by aravoth
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by aravoth
Whats wrong with it? I'm going to have to be the one that pays for it. You are willing to steal from someone else to pay for your own mistakes.
Capitalists have been stealing from the people since the end of feudalism.
They steal from workers when they take profit from the workers. Why should someone get rich off my labour?
edit on 2/3/2012 by ANOK because: typo
Why should laborers get rich off of my ideas?
Why not ensure that everyone has a good existence since we all have live here?
So you think retractable needles, and pace-makers were invented for "the good of existence"?
Originally posted by mastahunta
La Contra Dora
.........
Gee, well on the planet Earth politics generally have two sides, are you telling me that
Hitler didn't have any opposition?
So if Hitler is a left winger you can tell us the name of the party that opposed his Left
wing ideology.
La Contra Dora
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by aravoth
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by aravoth
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by aravoth
Whats wrong with it? I'm going to have to be the one that pays for it. You are willing to steal from someone else to pay for your own mistakes.
Capitalists have been stealing from the people since the end of feudalism.
They steal from workers when they take profit from the workers. Why should someone get rich off my labour?
edit on 2/3/2012 by ANOK because: typo
Why should laborers get rich off of my ideas?
Why not ensure that everyone has a good existence since we all have live here?
So you think retractable needles, and pace-makers were invented for "the good of existence"?
We were talking about education weren't we?
Are you saying that the investment in one education is comparable to the retractable needle?
Education is an investment and education greatly effects the prosperity of entire societies
Originally posted by aravoth
Originally posted by NoHierarchy
Originally posted by aravoth
Originally posted by NoHierarchy
Originally posted by aravoth
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by aravoth
Whats wrong with it? I'm going to have to be the one that pays for it. You are willing to steal from someone else to pay for your own mistakes.
Capitalists have been stealing from the people since the end of feudalism.
They steal from workers when they take profit from the workers. Why should someone get rich off my labour?
edit on 2/3/2012 by ANOK because: typo
Why should laborers get rich off of my ideas?
Because you can't enact your ideas without your laborers help. What have you to lose if you give them some dignity and real say in their position at the table??
Oh yes I can, I did it for years, like I said earlier, I could automate the entire process and fire everyone, it would save me a ton of money in the long run.
Ok... then why not do that??
I'm actually planning on doing just that, but thats years away. I know, I'm everything wrong with the world.edit on 3-2-2012 by aravoth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NoHierarchy
I can agree to a large extent. I'm uneasy in considering any room for right/libertarian... perhaps the spectrum could be altered in a geometric way... where the libertarian right can have some of its depth shaved off of the libertarian axis and the left would have a deeper libertarian potential?
Originally posted by aravoth
So invest in it, why do you have to make me invest in it also?
Originally posted by aravoth
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by aravoth
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by aravoth
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by aravoth
Whats wrong with it? I'm going to have to be the one that pays for it. You are willing to steal from someone else to pay for your own mistakes.
Capitalists have been stealing from the people since the end of feudalism.
They steal from workers when they take profit from the workers. Why should someone get rich off my labour?
edit on 2/3/2012 by ANOK because: typo
Why should laborers get rich off of my ideas?
Why not ensure that everyone has a good existence since we all have live here?
So you think retractable needles, and pace-makers were invented for "the good of existence"?
We were talking about education weren't we?
Are you saying that the investment in one education is comparable to the retractable needle?
Education is an investment and education greatly effects the prosperity of entire societies
So invest in it, why do you have to make me invest in it also?
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Originally posted by aravoth
So invest in it, why do you have to make me invest in it also?
Because these people have no idea what it means to have PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. At least on things like paying for their own education and such...
Heck, soon enough they are going to want free housing, and free cars, after all they need to sleep, and need a mode of transportaion to attend college/university...
Originally posted by ANOK
I just think the left should reapropriate the term and the right stop using it.
Either that, or they realise they are actually more left than right.
Reform in government, i.e. smaller government, is a left wing idea, not right wing. Right wing is more authority, not less.
Originally posted by theubermensch
Are you wearing a patriot costume?
Its everyones personal responsibility to have a social conscience.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Originally posted by mastahunta
La Contra Dora
.........
Gee, well on the planet Earth politics generally have two sides, are you telling me that
Hitler didn't have any opposition?
So if Hitler is a left winger you can tell us the name of the party that opposed his Left
wing ideology.
La Contra Dora
Gee, well several nations have had no political oposition, and only one side existed/exists...
Or are you going to rewrite that fact about history as well?...
Let's see, North Korea, China, the old U.S.S.R., Cuba, and others...
Or according to you none of them existed...
BTW, what the heck is "La Contra Dora"?...
That makes no sense in Spanish at all...
edit on 3-2-2012 by ElectricUniverse because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Wow... do tell us, what in the world does that have ANYTHING to do with HItler being a SOCIALIST?...
Ok, let's do this, can you tell us the name of the rightwing party in Cuba that has opposed castro's party since the Cuban revolution?...
clock is ticking...go...
La Contra Dora
.........
Gee, well on the planet Earth politics generally have two sides, are you telling me that
Hitler didn't have any opposition?
So if Hitler is a left winger you can tell us the name of the party that opposed his Left
wing ideology.
La Contra Dora
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Originally posted by theubermensch
Are you wearing a patriot costume?
Its everyones personal responsibility to have a social conscience.
No, I left my "patriot costume" when my parents and I escaped Cuba...
So you agree with FORCING people to do your will...
Ok master, you win, I shall turn to the dark side master...
Originally posted by mastahunta
Are you OK man/girl?
I might embarass you, but I will list it like you are 10 years old with an undeveloped
logic center...
1. You claimed that Hitler was a leftwinger
2. I hold that Hitler was a right winger opposed by left wingers, I proved my point
Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands – KPD was Hitlers opposition. LEFTWINGERS
3. You still claimed Hitler was a leftwinger, I asked you to prove it by establishing the
opposition and their contrary ideas. (THERE IS NO SUCH THING)
You failed, because you believe in made up narratives not history
Originally posted by theubermensch
Not forcing. What if Cuba had not been a victim of Imperialism? What if 'upward mobility' was not bs. Dont you think things could be better for all? Not just some?
Originally posted by Shred
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Wow... do tell us, what in the world does that have ANYTHING to do with HItler being a SOCIALIST?...
Ok, let's do this, can you tell us the name of the rightwing party in Cuba that has opposed castro's party since the Cuban revolution?...
clock is ticking...go...
La Contra Dora
.........
Gee, well on the planet Earth politics generally have two sides, are you telling me that
Hitler didn't have any opposition?
So if Hitler is a left winger you can tell us the name of the party that opposed his Left
wing ideology.
La Contra Dora
You are painting the issue in a way too simple manner. Post-WW1 German politics revolved around opposing vs upholding the Weimar republic, with one side hoping to keep the democratic system and the other hoping to return to a more authoritarian model. For example the Germans national peoples party were conservative monarchists, who at first opposed the National Socialist welfare programs and then joined forces with the party to attempt to contain its growth and implementation of policies. As the Nazi party grew it was only logical to support it if you were against the Weimar republic and the Versailles treaty. As it was after all still a democracy, the parties and individuals tried to find democratic means to stop the Nazis from gaining too much power. Paul von Hindenburg is a good example of this.
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by Shred
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Wow... do tell us, what in the world does that have ANYTHING to do with HItler being a SOCIALIST?...
Ok, let's do this, can you tell us the name of the rightwing party in Cuba that has opposed castro's party since the Cuban revolution?...
clock is ticking...go...
La Contra Dora
.........
Gee, well on the planet Earth politics generally have two sides, are you telling me that
Hitler didn't have any opposition?
So if Hitler is a left winger you can tell us the name of the party that opposed his Left
wing ideology.
La Contra Dora
You are painting the issue in a way too simple manner. Post-WW1 German politics revolved around opposing vs upholding the Weimar republic, with one side hoping to keep the democratic system and the other hoping to return to a more authoritarian model. For example the Germans national peoples party were conservative monarchists, who at first opposed the National Socialist welfare programs and then joined forces with the party to attempt to contain its growth and implementation of policies. As the Nazi party grew it was only logical to support it if you were against the Weimar republic and the Versailles treaty. As it was after all still a democracy, the parties and individuals tried to find democratic means to stop the Nazis from gaining too much power. Paul von Hindenburg is a good example of this.
I am painting it that way specifically because, opposition will indicate the the bent of their opposition.
Logically speaking, if two parties are in unity there will be no conflict, however the Nazi party
actively hunted and murdered Communist and Communist tried to murder Hitler on several
occasions.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
reply to post by mastahunta
Oh and btw, in case you didn't know, so far seem to be increadibly ignorant on history, the Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands was the COMMUNIST PARTY...Hitler was a NATIONAL SOCIALIST...
Yes, both leftwingers, but with different ideas on how Germany should be run...edit on 3-2-2012 by ElectricUniverse because: (no reason given)