It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Cold Fusion Times Reports Successful Cold Fusion Demonstration at MIT

page: 1
12

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 12:04 PM
link   

Cold Fusion Times Reports Successful Cold Fusion Demonstration at MIT


www.e-catworld.com

Cold Fusion Times is reporting today about a demonstration of cold fusion that took place at a short course on at MIT taught by Drs. Peter Hagelstein and Mitchell Swarz. The report states, ” This JET Energy NANOR(TM) demonstrated a significant energy gain greater than 10, much larger than the previous open demonstration. This exhibition is also remarkable because it proved the role of lattice in enabling CF/LANR activity. It followed Prof. Hagelstein sharing his breakthrough explanatory theory of cold fusion.”
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 12:04 PM
link   
January 30-31, 2012 - Cambridge, MA. - As part of the IAP Course on COLD FUSION at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dr. Mitchell Swartz, JET Energy, and Prof. Peter Hagelstein demonstrated cold fusion openly for scientists and engineers. The demonstration was a two day part of the detailed, yet overview, seven day course run by Prof. Hagelstein and Dr. Swartz, and followed the first open demonstrations of cold fusion at MIT in 2003. This JET Energy NANOR(TM) demonstrated a significant energy gain greater than 10, much larger than the previous open demonstration. This exhibition is also remarkable because it confirmed the role of the nanoengineered lattice in enabling the CF/LANR activity. It followed Prof. Hagelstein sharing his breakthrough explanatory theory of cold fusion during the first 5 days. The NANOR technology of JET Energy may have already begun to shatter a few preconceived notions of skeptics and cold fusioneers.
world.std.com...

Another interesting thing is their demonstration back in 2003 of the PLUSOR-system, which also successfully demonstrated the cold-fusion process, although only at a 2.5 times gain, 1/4th of the efficiency of the current NANOR system.

world.std.com...

Another interesting tidbit from the site,


Ultracorrupt individuals within the US Patent Office and the Board of Patent Appeals and elsewhere continue to cover up cold fusion applications and other alternative energy inventions. They falsely have claimed there is "no utility". Really? Does anyone reallty believe that lie? Despite past open demonstrations, and hundreds of peer-reviewed publications, they claim there is no operability. For what reason? Who do they really work for? Write and telephone your Congressperson today and demand that the US Patent Office and other Agencies be investigated by Congress for their systematic coverup of cold fusion applications since March 1989. Please consider helping today, before another day passes with the current energy problem, and the absolute lack of interest in actually solving the problem which Washington, DC, the federal government, and the USPTO have shown for two decades on this subject. Remind them all that the USPTO has refused Free of Information Act (FOIA) requests by falsely purporting that the "public has no interest". Remind them that the obviously corrupt USPTO Examiners and Judges dare purport that there is "no utlility" to the science and engineering of cold fusion - the technology of ultraclean, highly efficient alternative energy.

world.std.com...
edit on 1-2-2012 by NeoVain because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 12:07 PM
link   
Here is a relevant video about cold fusion, MIT has been notorious for discrediting cold fusion scientists, when the proof is there. Just for your viewing pleasure, cold fusion would be our savior


It is highly interesting that a proven test from MIT has been conducted, and released for public consumption.



The truth will be revealed this year folks! Its already happening!
edit on 1/2/12 by AzureSky because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 12:13 PM
link   
welcome to 2012 - mindreading, cold-fusion, new kennedy tapes...whats next =)



posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 12:29 PM
link   
reply to post by AzureSky
 


Im not so sure that this is a 'proven' test at this point.

from the source article :


Cold Fusion Times, as far as I can gather, is owned and published by Dr. Mitchell Swarz, who is also involved in JET Energy Inc., so it would be interesting and important to get a report from someone outside the organization about this event. There are very few details provided about the experiment that was demonstrated, but a report on a previous 2003 JET Energy demonstration of a device called a ‘Plusor’ is available here, in which a net energy gain of 230 per cent was reported.



posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 12:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by PhoenixOD
reply to post by AzureSky
 


Im not so sure that this is a 'proven' test at this point.

from the source article :


Cold Fusion Times, as far as I can gather, is owned and published by Dr. Mitchell Swarz, who is also involved in JET Energy Inc., so it would be interesting and important to get a report from someone outside the organization about this event. There are very few details provided about the experiment that was demonstrated, but a report on a previous 2003 JET Energy demonstration of a device called a ‘Plusor’ is available here, in which a net energy gain of 230 per cent was reported.


Quite, but there has been a lot of suppression and ridicule for those who want to explore cold fusion, those who have information do not want to destroy their careers and names by studying or publishing or testing cold fusion, they are called 'whackjobs' or 'cooks' for example. We had cold fusion tech a long time ago, but was ridiculed and suppressed (via false documents), it was more 'profitible' to use hot fusion tech, keep us under the guise of an 'energy crisis', if cold fusion hadn't been put down, and now is a taboo, then we would have no need for power plants, or nuclear facilities. Everything could be self powered with cold fusion because of it can be scaled.

Its interesting to contemplate, because i completely believe that energy technology should be far better than it is now. Look at technology, it doubles every single year now and is only going to increase, so with better technology one would think that we could figure out a better power solution. Like the carb for older cars, one could modify one of those and get 200+ mpg. Why are we moving backwards (why do you think, profit). It allllll makes sense when all the pieces of the puzzle start falling together. Too many reports of being told to "be quite" about certain technologies or ideas, instant classified patents with certain patents (anti-grav, anything that 'defies physics', etc etc.). Sooo.. Why?

Profit i suppose
Power of populations.



posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 12:52 PM
link   
reply to post by PhoenixOD
 


How about you look at the actual data and evidence provided instead of searching for an angle of attack the first thing you do? If you want more details than is provided, you can contact those involved you know. That is, if you have a genuine interest. That is usually a better way to deny ignorance than lazily looking for the first opportunity to cast doubt.



posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 12:55 PM
link   
reply to post by NeoVain
 


Maybe i misread the source article but when it said


Cold Fusion Times, as far as I can gather, is owned and published by Dr. Mitchell Swarz, who is also involved in JET Energy Inc., so it would be interesting and important to get a report from someone outside the organization about this event. There are very few details provided about the experiment that was demonstrated


I though it was expressing some doubt about the test.

I myself think that cold fusion is possible.


edit on 1-2-2012 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 04:07 PM
link   
reply to post by AzureSky
 


very good video



new topics

top topics



 
12

log in

join