It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by woodwardjnr
British empire is the biggest mass murderer of History and you haven't debunked it.
Firstly,I do not believe british stats on india as they are corrupted.secondly the data is showing huge deviations which could be symbols of mass genocide by the British of hundreds of millions altogether at once by means of starvation or mass executions.
Secondly a lot of indians have told me stories of how murderous and racist the british people were and they don't believe british stats as they consistently changed to lie about the mass murders there are several mass graves in UP,Madhya Pradesh which have been attributed to the murderous british by indian locals...
292366,0 1860 then
135634,2 1861
155 million killed? 1857 there was a massive revolt and it does indicate A MAJOR THING (again the figures alter ,indicates data quality is poor or the british were the hiding the scale of their monstrous mass murders
300963,0 1875 then all of a sudden
201888,1 1881
100 million killed?
288730,0 1885
282801,0 1890
276994,0 1895
and then after 1900 population kept falling till 1920 despite high fertility and birth rates(starvation,mass execution,genocide?).After independence india's population exploded.
The data quality is terrible as figures are not consistent for some years and show mass alterations.But it proves one thing.British are trying to hide true data with constantly altering figures. I guess it proves my point .British waged mass genocide in india and the 1.8 billion murdered by the British empire still stands.
and this is from your own source.
www.populstat.info...
Secondly ,refer to Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History or Amartya Sen's works on indian history(nobel prize winner)
Some of the data prior to 1902 with higher figures are for the whole area of British India, which included also Pakistan and Birma.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by mkgandhas
Yet another example of blatant off topic posting and anti-UK bigotry.
Could you please explain to me how you think these outright lies and ridiculous exaggerations about past events in the Indian sub-continent have any relevance whatsoever to Argentina allegedly attempting to blockade The Falklands.
Originally posted by Freeborn
... Argentina allegedly attempting to blockade The Falklands.
Originally posted by mkgandhas
reply to post by Maxatoria
reply to post by ComeFindMe
pakistan and bangladesh had a population of 35-45 million then. Secondly there was a very devastating famine done by the British on our india in areas of Uttar Pradesh,Rajashtan in 1860-61 in which 20-30 million died atleast ,though official british statistics show it as 2-5 million.This was believed to be reprisal by the British empire on Uttar Pradesh for the 1857 revolt of independence was started in Meerut ,Uttar Pradesh.
The bangladeshis estimate that british were responsible for 50 million deaths in Bangladesh while the Pakistanis believe that british were responsible for 30-70 million deaths in Pakistan.
So like deaths in India due to British =150-250 million
Deaths in Pakistan =30-70 million
Deaths in Bangladesh=50 million
370 million deaths due to artifically created british famines and mass genocides then.edit on 15-2-2012 by mkgandhas because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ComeFindMe
reply to post by ludwigvonmises003
Your sources are all clearly blogs or one-man-band sites. They hold no actual proof other than their own words.
Its slightly embarassing that you continue to highlight your own ineptitude through your racist sentiments. If I was maknig the same allegation against someone of a different religion or skin colour, I have no doubt that I would be unable to post here now.
In fact, I might take a leaf out of your book. I'll set up a site that says ludwigvonmises003 killed 8.2 trillion people, but TPTB are keeping it a secret. Then i'll reference it when I slander you. It will hold as much sway as your argument.
Go away.
Originally posted by gambon
if i was to play agent provocatuer , could the rise in deaths AFTER the uttar pradesh revolt, be put down to the lack of order , farming and distribution in those areas soley due to the revolt itself?
If it was seen this way it could be seen to reinforce how the british empire actually improved health,communications and transport , all of course for the benefits of trade.
Originally posted by korathin
Then please explain why the areas that the British controlled are today the poorest and most disenfranchised parts of India? Also it is amusing that you ignored education.
Originally posted by korathin
Originally posted by gambon
if i was to play agent provocatuer , could the rise in deaths AFTER the uttar pradesh revolt, be put down to the lack of order , farming and distribution in those areas soley due to the revolt itself?
If it was seen this way it could be seen to reinforce how the british empire actually improved health,communications and transport , all of course for the benefits of trade.
Then please explain why the areas that the British controlled are today the poorest and most disenfranchised parts of India? Also it is amusing that you ignored education. Because India had a far superior public educational system prior to the British invasion(in-fact the British copied many aspects of India's public educational system).
P.S
Farming distribution problems caused the mass deaths? In a way, yes. You see all the wheat grain was being distributed to London.edit on 19-2-2012 by korathin because: (no reason given)