Arsenic based life forems disputed....NASA science abominably poor

Well folkds this is interesting stuff.
It speaks to the phoney NASA manipulation of data and info to yield max public interest(thus funding).
Canadian scientist finds poor scientific methods and lack of meticulousness .
have a look here......

www.dailygalaxy.com...

The more they open thier yaps, the more they seem to discredit themselves.......

Awww I was really hoping that the bacteria that replaced phosphorus with arsenic was true. It might still be, but I would not be suprised at sloppy NASA science at all.

This does also discredit their recent study that says that the sun has nothing to do with climate change.

reply to post by stirling

The more they open thier yaps, the more they seem to discredit themselves.......

You are not familiar with how this whole science thing works are you?

reply to post by stirling

It speaks to the phoney NASA manipulation of data and info to yield max public interest(thus funding).

No, it speaks to NASA sometimes funding poorly designed experiments. In any event, this is old news:

www.abovetopsecret.com...