It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Introduction . In recent years, consideration of the possible warming of the climate due to the
injection into the atmosphere of ''greenhouse gases,'' particularly carbon dioxide, CO2,
1
has
motivated proposals to impose international limitations of the burning of fossil fuels, particularly
ones yielding less heating-value per gram of CO2 released, such as coal. The starting point of the
present paper is the widely-appreciated fact2
that increases in average world-wide temperature of
the magnitude currently predicted can be canceled
3
by preventing about 1% of incoming solar
radiation – insolation – from reaching the Earth.
4,5
This could be done by scattering into space
from the vicinity of the Earth an appropriately small fraction of total insolation. If performed nearoptimally,
6
we believe that the total cost of such an enhanced scattering operation would probably
be at most $1 billion per year, an expenditure that is two orders of magnitude smaller in economi
Positioning of scatterers of incoming solar radiation in the Earth’s upper atmosphere – specifically, the
middle to upper stratosphere – is a now-venerable approach that appears to provide the most practical
deployment, as operational lifetimes of such engineered scatterers can be as long as a half-decade;
required replacement rates are correspondingly modest. Thus, the stratosphere is where we propose to
deploy all of the insolation-modulation scattering systems that we propose for near-term study
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by PageAlaCearl
Great attempt at answering the OP, there.
However, the credibility of the video clip, from the film "What In The World Are They Spraying?" (or, "WITWATS"), has been shown to be lacking.....severely lacking, and in fact, the film is full of out-right lies.
Your external source quote, about a "scientist" at Wright-Patterson in Ohio? What was the source of that claim? It must be provided, to ascertain its accuracy.
Then, the many direct answers to the OP.....I will focus on just one: The claim that there are nozzles on the wings.
Care to provide proof of that assertion? Making a claim is one thing....backing it up with facts and evidence is another entirely.
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by PageAlaCearl
Great attempt at answering the OP, there.
However, the credibility of the video clip, from the film "What In The World Are They Spraying?" (or, "WITWATS"), has been shown to be lacking.....severely lacking, and in fact, the film is full of out-right lies.
Your external source quote, about a "scientist" at Wright-Patterson in Ohio? What was the source of that claim? It must be provided, to ascertain its accuracy.
Then, the many direct answers to the OP.....I will focus on just one: The claim that there are nozzles on the wings.
Care to provide proof of that assertion? Making a claim is one thing....backing it up with facts and evidence is another entirely.
As continuing chemtrail activity culminated in massive aerial spraying over Vancouver Island and Washington state March 20, 2002, and broadening plumes once again fanned out to haze clear blue skies – Air Traffic Controllers at major airports across the United States expressed concern over the emissions constantly showing up on their radar screens.
These radar returns are the signature of the fine aluminum particles found in laboratory tests of chemtrail-contaminated rain taken in Espanola, Ontario in the summer of 1999. The lab analysis found reflective quartz particles in the chemtrail fallout — and levels of aluminum FIVE TIMES higher than Ontario’s maximum permissible health safety standards.
In a fourth interview with reporter S.T. Brendt last week, Deep Sky stated that Air Traffic Controllers at Chicago’s O’Hare airport, all three major airports in New York, Los Angeles LAX, San Francisco, Atlanta, Cleveland, San Diego, Washington DC’s Dulles and Jacksonville, Florida, were being ordered to route airliners beneath formations of Air Force tanker planes spraying something that regularly clouds their screens.
Every controller, without exception, is being told to divert traffic due to military exercises , and to bring in traffic lower because of experiments that may degrade their radars. The controllers at Cleveland’s airport were surprised by the extent of obscuration on their radars.
Originally posted by ColAngus
reply to post by PageAlaCearl
Deepest apologies for the off-topic nature of my inquiry, but were you not recently banned under the ATS username "mileslong54"?
Well here some more evidence....
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by PageAlaCearl
Well here some more evidence....
Once again, you posted text from external source, with no citation for it.
Reading the text, I recognize having seen that same claim before.....it has been discredited and shown to have been entirely made-up.
If I remember correctly, it is originally attributed to Will Thomas....he is one of the "grandfathers" of the "chemtrail" hoax and myth.
AM I correct as to the provenance of that claim, of Air Traffic Controllers, and so-called "Deep Sky" nonsense??
edit on Wed 1 February 2012 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)
If a chemtrailer was to answer these questions
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by network dude
Yup. They're afraid.
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by network dude
You want people to answer your questions without providing where they got their answers? From what I learned in high school and college, concrete answers require citations.
If I were able to provide sources, would you accept certain sources over others?
Do you consider some people's opinions more reliable than others?
I'm guessing you want information from government and scientific sources.
From what I've been able to ascertain, the answers you want are still considered classified information.
I encourage you to search for your own answers and decide for yourself whether you believe heavy metals and biological materials are in chemical trails.
I also encourage you to search for your own answers why some trails persist while others do not.
As long as the government, military, and esteemed scientific community are not providing documentation, we are forced to come to our own conclusions.
Have fun with your thread.
(By the way, asking to be spoon fed is considered unbecoming in the both the educational and scientific communities.)