you're a capitalist, of course you do. you may be confusing private property with personal property here though. personal property, which some socialists call "possession", is your house, your car, your toothbrush, etc. private property is the house you own but rent to someone and make profit off of it, the business you own that people work at, the machinery in that business that you may have never personally used, etc.

Originally posted by rainbowbear

you're a capitalist, of course you do. you may be confusing private property with personal property here though. personal property, which some socialists call "possession", is your house, your car, your toothbrush, etc. private property is the house you own but rent to someone and make profit off of it, the business you own that people work at, the machinery in that business that you may have never personally used, etc.

check this out--most people dont own those houses, cars and land! US is Socialist already. there is something called Allodial Title, that is out right ownership--90% of mortgages and car titles people dont own, legally. Its true! Now understand that all personal freedoms stem from private ownership. So , you see, due to dumbing down, you, me, and everyone in the matrix--HAS BOUGHT A LIE! this is why were being robbed by "capitalists"

now you bring up some good points, but as you can see, a clear understanding of your actual rights in this might help us pull our asses out of a sling. Ive been down that socialist road--hell--if you live in america--you should recognise it as Socialist. Its really pissing people off! Ill wager all my money that you, and most here, think they own their car, or house, or property, because they have a colored title. but they dont. they dont understand these 3 things.

1. Alodial Title
2. The history of Property Rights in America
3. The limiting of Federal Jurisdiction.

I promise to look further into your stance, if you will explore these points as well.
thanks

Originally posted by eboyd
it's far superior to feudalism, but demonization of directly democratic processes is simply propaganda. until the people are directly involved in the decision making process, we will live under the rule of tyrants.

Originally posted by petrus4
I am not saying that it was written by bankers directly. Nowhere close. That's not how the cabal operate. They work to create scenarios where, while you're doing what you think is your own thing, (which very often looks like the complete opposite of what they want) you end up assisting them in achieving what they were aiming for all along.

That is some people's interpretation. It wasn't Trotsky's. He was the originator of the "permanent revolution," doctrine; and as it suggests in Red Symphony, I do consider violent revolution a trademark of the cabal. One of their central tenets is, "Order through Chaos." They use violence, confusion, and mayhem as a form of obfuscation, and seize control of things during the obscurity and uncertainty which it creates.