Chem trails photographed tonight with long exposure over Northern Austin, page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 38 times


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 09:38 PM by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by Witness2008
reply to
post by Aloysius the Gaul



I suggest the evidence is right above our heads. Pay attention to the language within Tellers proposal.


What about it? I see nothing except someone presenting an idea that he thinks may be able to be done some time soon - indeed AFAIK we can probably do it now - we could probably have done it in 1950 - the actual mechanics are not very difficult at all IMO.

Then add that link to all of the other evidence of intent such as patents,


Patents are ideas - by definition they are not secret, and they are not evidence of anything other than someone having an idea and wanting to protect it.

Can show they are actually being used?


Air force statements,


What airforce statements?

eyewitnesses


I have only ever seen anonymous "eyewitness" statements, all of which have obvious and considerable inaccuracies of fact. Unless the eyewitnesses are prepared to be cross examined these are useless and IMO probably fake.


and systematic testing of water and soil,


I have seen a lot of this, as well as some blood tests - all of them have shown values that are within normal ranges for the medium being tested, although they are presented as being high. And since many continue to be said to be high after the fats have been pointed out IMO they are deliberate disinformation.

then you tell me and everyone else here that has had to combat the confusion and ridicule that you and others use to kill these threads and their debate that chemical plowing of the skies can't possibly be happening.


Au contraire - it could possibly be happening - as I say above there is no technical reason why it cold not.

but there is also no verifiable evidence that it actually is.

edit on 31-1-2012 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 09:39 PM by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by waynos


I'm glad you raised the subject of government experimentation. It's been going on for years and years and years... I am also happy you are happy in your conviction that nothing is wrong in the world and that we can all go back to sleep. I think you are quite alone in that feeling though...
Warning: Video contains shocking images of a man experimented on by his own government at the age of 5.



reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 10:00 PM by Deja`Vu
Skeptics debunk this... Chemtrails or the real scientific term Geo Engineering... is very real and has long been proven. I have been around a lot longer then most and I can tell you, this is some new technology.

Authorized by Congress and sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, a monumental and in-depth study on global warming and possible corrective measures (mitigations) was undertaken in the early 1990s. Represented were senior researchers, faculty, theoreticians, atmospheric scientists, department heads and CEO's from a multitude of prestigious institutions. The Smithsonian, Harvard, General Motors, Cambridge, MIT, Yale, World Resources Institute, National Center for Atmospheric Research, the Secretary General of the United Nations, Oxford, Brookings Institution, Columbia University, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Carnegie-Mellon University, Princeton University, Brown University, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, and many more. This colossal study recalls the scope, expense and secrecy of the Manhattan Project, yet the goals and eventual impacts of it are far greater.

One investigator took the clues provided by 'Deep Shield' and dug in. She eventually found an N.A.S. study on Geoengineering and the Mitigation of Global Warming. This study is still available online and is also available in hardcover. This massive document validates the insider information provided by Deep Shield, and has lead to an additional gold mine of evidence.

This massive research study is entitled: Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base - Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming, sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The results were presented in 1992 and published in book form in 2000 by the National Academy Press. This 994 page study is the textbook on greenhouse gasses, global warming, policy decisions and mitigation's (corrective measures). Included within is the hard science many chemtrails researchers have been searching for: the scientists, agencies, institutions and corporations involved, cost factors, chemical formula, mathematical modeling, delivery methods, policies, recruiting of foreign governments, acquisition of materials, and the manufacturing of aerosol compounds, ect.
Source





reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 11:35 PM by Uncinus
reply to post by FissionSurplus



For broken contrails, it's just variations in the atmosphere. Like invisible clouds. see:

contrailscience.com...

For jets that turn around, I'd suspect (without seeing what you are seeing) that it's actually a different jet just flying in the opposite direction. Did you actually maintain visual contact with the jet through both directions?

Jet do fly in racetrack holds sometimes though, for a variety of reasons. It's possible that the end of the racetrack was just in non-contrailing atmospheric conditions.


reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 01:34 AM by dangerevans007
reply to post by FissionSurplus



Might I just say, sir, that your profile pic made me forget all about those chemicals the government is putting in my air, food, and water. Times like these, it's good to laugh.


reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 03:46 AM by waynos
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to
post by waynos


... I am also happy you are happy in your conviction that nothing is wrong in the world and that we can all go back to sleep. I think you are quite alone in that feeling though...



Well yes, I would be if I felt that way, but since I never said any such thing that is a strange response for you to make.

I did however directly address some questions you yourself raised which you have not acknowledged at all. I actually thought you were interested in discussing our different viewpoints from the way you posed your queries, it seems not.

Did I write anything that you factually disagree with, or is the strawman there because you can't be bothered?
edit on 1-2-2012 by waynos because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 06:25 AM by txjab512
reply to post by miniatus



Are you kidding me? Take a trip to your local airport and see what kind of trails are left by the aircraft flying near that airport. Then wait around and time how long it takes for those trails to disappear. Oh, and how normal is it for commercial or even private aircraft to fly over a city in a crisc cross pattern. Have you ever seen a crop duster spray a field before. Please pull your head out of your rear for a brief moment, look at the evidence, and form an opinion based on some type of rational thought. Wow!


reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 07:19 AM by TheBassistant
reply to post by robwerden



Glad I wasn't the only one to see this happening yesterday! I too live in North Austin and am on the road about 6 hours a day, didn't take me long to notice we were getting hammered all day yesterday. Snapped some pics as well, will upload when I get the time. Excellent pics by the way, I expect the debunkers to start claiming at any moment now that pilots have been creating grids in the sky purely for the enjoyment of John Q. Public for millennia now, LOL.



reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 09:13 AM by zarp3333
Originally posted by miniatus
Originally posted by spoonbender
nice grid work in the sky
when I see lines like that, in the sky
a brown paper lunch bag
and start to hyperventilate into it...

don't breath the vapors



There's no vapors.. the logic of that is absolutely zero given that the pilots have families on the ground, they breathe the same air.. vapors/gasses/chemicals travel .. you can't control where they are going to go ( precisely why radiation is all over the place from Japan ) .. jet streams, air currents.. .. so if anyone would apply any logic at all to the chemtrail theory they'd realize how silly it is .. it would literally mean that those behind it are poisoning / affecting themselves as well as everyone else.. including their own families, and neighbors.. and superiors

They are almost certainly the same thing they always are... contrails produced by normal, explainable means .. and nothing more.. there's been no verifiable or credible evidence for chemtrails, ever.

Sorry ..
edit on 1/31/2012 by miniatus because: (no reason given)


You should be sorry. The argument based on the assumption that the people spraying would not poison their own families assumes there is no antidote.

Chem trails have been tested and showed to contain aluminum, strontium, cesium and other metals. Chelation therapy removes metals and minerals from the blood. When combined with a regimen of supplements, you can selectively remove harmful metals from your body. Who can say what other antidote exists?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



NOAA Doc Strong Evidence They Are and Have Been Spraying Us
  Posted 15 days ago with 36 member flags
Chemtrail Programs Only Cost Us $5 Billion a Year
  Posted 5 days ago with 8 member flags
Cost analysis of aerosol solar radiation management published
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
How do elites escape chemtrails?
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
ChemTrails over Michigan
  Posted 11 days ago with 3 member flags
Geo-engineering (Chemtrails) and Bible Prophecy
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

My rant about my country.... England
  Rant: 8 hours ago, 47 replies
PROOF 9/11/01 was an inside job
  9/11 Conspiracies: 17 hours ago, 36 replies
I have a new Kitten....
  General Chit Chat: 17 hours ago, 26 replies