Originally posted by Witness2008
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
I suggest the evidence is right above our heads. Pay attention to the language within Tellers proposal.
What about it? I see nothing except someone presenting an idea that he thinks may be able to be done some time soon - indeed AFAIK we can probably do it now - we could probably have done it in 1950 - the actual mechanics are not very difficult at all IMO.
Then add that link to all of the other evidence of intent such as patents,
Patents are ideas - by definition they are not secret, and they are not evidence of anything other than someone having an idea and wanting to protect it.
Can show they are actually being used?
Air force statements,
What airforce statements?
I have only ever seen anonymous "eyewitness" statements, all of which have obvious and considerable inaccuracies of fact. Unless the eyewitnesses are prepared to be cross examined these are useless and IMO probably fake.
and systematic testing of water and soil,
I have seen a lot of this, as well as some blood tests - all of them have shown values that are within normal ranges for the medium being tested, although they are presented as being high. And since many continue to be said to be high after the fats have been pointed out IMO they are deliberate disinformation.
then you tell me and everyone else here that has had to combat the confusion and ridicule that you and others use to kill these threads and their debate that chemical plowing of the skies can't possibly be happening.
Au contraire - it could possibly be happening - as I say above there is no technical reason why it cold not.
but there is also no verifiable evidence that it actually is.
edit on 31-1-2012 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)