Room 237 Explores Hidden Meanings in The Shining (Moon), page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 05:17 AM by lacrimaererum
reply to post by Jimbowsk



i think the story is only secondary to kubrick.

king actually came out and said he was not happy with the film of the shinning.


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 11:05 AM by ProudBird
reply to post by CaptainBeno



This is utter rubbish:

Apparently this film may be code for what really happened during Kubrick's faking of the moon landings?


Long, long ago shown to be absurd.....and yet gullible people still toss it out now and then.

It began with an idiot named Jay Wiedner. Amazing how some on the Internet will believe one lunatic like Wiedner, but disregard the roughly 400,000 people who worked at NASA, and the various contractors, during Apollo.


I have not seen the film but....


Oh, that's just 'brilliant'.....


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 04:32 PM by CaptainBeno
reply to post by ProudBird



Just the jumped up response I expected from you. Shoot and ask questions later.

I have not seen the film as yet as It has not been released? Is that such a big deal?



I have not seen the film but, I'm just throwing this one up for die hard fans of this conspiracy.


Yeah, nice cut and paste job ProudBird? You forgot the rest.

Did I say this is what I believe? Did I ram it down you throat ProudBird? No.



After all this is a conspiracy website is it not? And after 2544 posts since 3/10/11 seems you too have a lot to say?
edit on 31-1-2012 by CaptainBeno because: Fed up



reply posted on 2-2-2012 @ 05:48 PM by elmoastro
The Shining is Kubrick's way of revealing his contract with the US Govt to film the Apollo footage. Remember, the film technology at that time was cutting edge and it takes years sometimes to become fully aware of reality (see 9/11).

I grew up believing the Apollo missions were real and I wouldn't doubt we've been to the moon if shown proof. But knowing what we know about the psyops programs of the 50s and 60s, and then looking through the lens of a man trapped in a contract he can't get out of, and you see his artistry emerge as he hands you the metaphor so you can understand. He hijacks King's book and adapts it to fit his message. Call it a conspiracy but you have to allow the present day geniuses the ability to trump the understanding of the masses. Otherwise you might as well start burning witches again.

Try and find the full version of "Kubrick's Odyssey, Secrets Hidden in the Films of Stanley Kubrick". It's been discussed a bit on ATS for sure.

If you can get to a point where you see this reality, then you have to look at the present reality through the same lens--knowing what you know--and understanding that cutting edge technology is meant to be ultra-realistic to the point of fooling the masses.

I showed some kids the film. Here's a generation that grew up on cutting edge technology & computing. First thing out of their mouths after watching, "That's totally fake". The children see what adults cannot.
edit on 2-2-2012 by elmoastro because: (no reason given)
edit on 2-2-2012 by elmoastro because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 2-2-2012 @ 06:05 PM by NuminousCosmos
reply to post by elmoastro



I can see right through Kubrick's special effects in 2001 and The Shining. I can not see through the vast amounts of documentary evidence that the Apollo missions returned.

Like I've said before, if Kubrick faked the moon landings than he should have received the Nobel Prize in Astrophysics and Planetary Science.

We are so desperate to be in "the know", that we refuse to understand the truth.


reply posted on 2-2-2012 @ 06:43 PM by NuminousCosmos
reply to post by elmoastro



No they are not. Watch 2001 on Blu Ray and compare to the Blu Ray of "For All Mankind." There is a HUGE difference in image detail.

I can see the paint on the Discovery, I can see the moving star backgrounds when the Orion moves through space towards the moon, (something that does not happen in real life), I can even see the chunky light source behind the windows of Space Station V.

I can not see the wires on Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15,16, and 17. I can not see any soundstages as Apollo 17's LRV drove over miles of the lunar surface, and I can not see the rear/front projection artifacts that many claim to exist.

I know these things.



edit on 2/2/2012 by NuminousCosmos because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^