Mohenjo-Daro, Lost City of the Ancients, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 30-1-2012 @ 11:05 PM by Hanslune
Howdy Lonewolf

Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Tales abound all throughout history of the ancient city of Mohenjo Daro. Archeaologists have found minute traces of radiation and many of the walls and ruins of structures have had their stone blocks vitrified in some sort of cataclysm that fused the stone blocks together like magma.


I would question that claim; most of MD is made of fired mud brick with mortar. Radiation? In parts of that region there are local areas with natural uranium deposits but could you link to a report that has radiation at the city site itself?


Some scientists say it would have taken a tremndous amount of heat equivalent of 3000+ degrees to fuse those blocks like that.


Like who? If you are gonna try the nuke theory that one was debunked decades ago...

Ancient alien theorists toss around tales and theories of alien invaders dropping nukes on the city. We do not know for sure what happened, other than local lore and myths and legends. Perhaps an asteroid struck nearby at some point, or a volcanic eruption. We just do not know. I looked up the co-ordinates on google earth and they are 27.325313, 68.133055. You really cannot grasp how large that city was until youre looking down on it from above. Mohenjo Daro is easily 3-4 times the size of Babylon.


MD was destroyed and rebuilt at least seven times. It is possible it's final abandonment was caused by the shifting of the Indus away from the city, without water the place and the agriculture died, another theory is that a few years of unseasonable flooding destroyed the agricultural base and the city was given up.
edit on 30/1/12 by Hanslune because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 12:05 AM by Magnificient
reply to post by Hanslune



There's several ancient cities that have been converted partially to glass from what could only be a nuke. They all show up as hot-spots. If I was going to doubt anything about the story, it wouldn't be about it's destruction. The Hindu have a pretty good record of an ancient nuclear war.


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 02:36 PM by Harte
Originally posted by Magnificient
reply to
post by Hanslune



There's several ancient cities that have been converted partially to glass from what could only be a nuke.


In fact, there exists not even one such city.

Harte


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 02:42 PM by Hanslune
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by Magnificient
reply to
post by Hanslune



There's several ancient cities that have been converted partially to glass from what could only be a nuke.


In fact, there exists not even one such city.

Harte


Very true I missed that claim - of course there are some mysterious forts

Vitrified forts

..but I don't actually believes people (or aliens, lol) were popping nukes on the British isles back then


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 02:46 PM by Harte
Originally posted by Hanslune
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by Magnificient
reply to
post by Hanslune



There's several ancient cities that have been converted partially to glass from what could only be a nuke.


In fact, there exists not even one such city.

Harte


Very true I missed that claim - of course there are some mysterious forts

Vitrified forts

..but I don't actually believes people (or aliens, lol) were popping nukes on the British isles back then


Of course not.

Everyone knows it was laser beams (or lazer beans.)

Harte


reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 11:17 PM by coredrill
reply to post by genghisKAHNSPIRACY



No offence meant.

It is your personal belief that you jsut wrote up there. But it is not the actual truth.
Just like you, millions ghave their own personal beliefs. but all those million beliefs do not make a whole truth.
truth is verifiable. belief is not. thats the difference.


Saying that, i should add...

Some like dainken, sitchin, hancock, childress do not have a personal belief, but they have a personal mantra to make some moolah (sitchin had, may god show mercy on his soul)..they dont have any concrete belief. when they put their distorted beliefs into paper, they modify existing facts and data to provide support to their distorted beliefs.


reply posted on 2-2-2012 @ 10:32 AM by Hanslune
Originally posted by coredrill
reply to
post by genghisKAHNSPIRACY



No offence meant.

It is your personal belief that you jsut wrote up there. But it is not the actual truth.
Just like you, millions ghave their own personal beliefs. but all those million beliefs do not make a whole truth.
truth is verifiable. belief is not. thats the difference.


Saying that, i should add...

Some like dainken, sitchin, hancock, childress do not have a personal belief, but they have a personal mantra to make some moolah (sitchin had, may god show mercy on his soul)..they dont have any concrete belief. when they put their distorted beliefs into paper, they modify existing facts and data to provide support to their distorted beliefs.


Well said Coredrill

One addition or correction Childress, I believe actually believes this stuff and makes money doing so, I've 'spoken' to him on forums a number of times - he use to post at a forum called Junjun. We use to debate (endlessly) about the 1909 letter about Egyptians in the Grand Canyon
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Amazing, X-Ray probe of Antikythera Mechanism (Video)
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Eye of Horus is actually an early math system?
  Posted 16 days ago with 45 member flags
Pi, Golden Ratio and Speed of Light encoded into Great Pyramid
  Posted 10 days ago with 33 member flags
Why is the Ancient Alien Theory difficult to accept?
  Posted 15 days ago with 26 member flags
Unknown ancient language found on unearthed Assyrian tablets
  Posted 18 days ago with 21 member flags
"The Venus Blueprint"
  Posted 13 days ago with 16 member flags
The Lost City of Vilcabamba
  Posted 11 days ago with 14 member flags