It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by metaldemon2000
Originally posted by BobAthome
From the Article:
quote
"The National Post notes that France responded this month by saying it would go ahead with the election. It plans to place ballot boxes in its embassy and French consulates in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Montreal, Quebec City and Moncton, which, technically, are sovereign territory of France."
This is very hard for me too get my head around,,Moncton, which, technically, are sovereign territory of France,,
Having been Born in Moncton,,Batherst, actually,,i'm both a natural born Canadian Citizen,, as well as French CitizenShip,,?
So technically i am Entitled too both French and Canadian citizenship,, so i have dual citizenship?
seriously??
No, the embassies and consulates are considered french soil. It is the same with any country, nomatter where they are in the world.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by ipsedixit
As far as I can tell the French proposals have no legitimacy in Canadian, International, Eurpopean or even French law and is merely intended to stir up passions etc and create conflict within Canada.
Why France constantly tries to cause trouble in other nation states, and allegedly friendly ones, is quite frankly beyond me and perhaps only the French can explain.
The best theory I can come up with is that France still holds some sort of jealous envy at the success of The British Empire and the abject failure of it's own and that it still retains some arrogant misguided hope of gaining some sort of modern global empire.
Fortunately times change.
Originally posted by BobAthome
o.k yes everyone knows about Ebassies and Diplomatic Immunity and Soveriegn Soil,,,
" France will elect 11 legislators to the French National Assembly, an exercise for which France has carved the world into 11 electoral districts. One seat up for grabs is "North America,"
11 electoral districts,, this means that FRANCE is claiming Territoriel Souvrenty in 11 electoral districts,,
One seat up for grabs,,if here in NorthAmerica,, and if the elected person wins there riding,, in one of the 11 electoral districts,,
then that person represents France in the House of Assembly,,
yaaa let that sink in,,,,,,,
so do i have dual citizen ship being born on Moncton,,one of the territoriel claims, of France,,being represented by,,,, one of the 11 electoral districts,,in the House of Assembly,,ie French Government.
Me.
Originally posted by metaldemon2000
Originally posted by BobAthome
From the Article:
quote
"The National Post notes that France responded this month by saying it would go ahead with the election. It plans to place ballot boxes in its embassy and French consulates in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Montreal, Quebec City and Moncton, which, technically, are sovereign territory of France."
This is very hard for me too get my head around,,Moncton, which, technically, are sovereign territory of France,,
Having been Born in Moncton,,Batherst, actually,,i'm both a natural born Canadian Citizen,, as well as French CitizenShip,,?
So technically i am Entitled too both French and Canadian citizenship,, so i have dual citizenship?
seriously??
No, the embassies and consulates are considered french soil. It is the same with any country, nomatter where they are in the world.
He joined the Department of External Affairs in 1941, served as senior adviser to Canadian members of the International Control Commission in Vietnam in 1954, and became the legal advisor to the Department of External Affairs in 1956. A professor of international law at the University of Ottawa, he was the first Canadian to sit on the United Nations International Law Commission. From 1964 to 1970 he was Under-Secretary of State for External Affairs. He was Canada's first francophone Ambassador to the United States from 1970 to 1975, and Head of the Canadian Mission to the European Communities from 1975. He was appointed to advise the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) in 1978.
Bosher (York Univ.), a distinguished student of the ancien regime, discusses French meddling in Canadian affairs, a continuing phenomenon since the 1960s. Bosher is a long way out of his field, to be sure, but he has tracked down some splendid sources, including the hitherto closed papers of Canadian diplomat Marcel Cadieux, and he makes a compelling, if not wholly convincing, case concerning French activities and the reasons behind them. Essentially, Bosher argues, Gaullist hatred of the Anglo-Saxons drives the French efforts, and Paris, seeing Canada as in Washington's pocket, hopes to split off Quebec into an independent French-speaking state. What this might do to Quebec, let alone Canada, scarcely crosses the French mind, according to Bosher. That roughly 100,000 Canadians--the vast majority English-speaking--died to liberate France in two world wars matters not a whit; that Quebec opinion in WW II was heavily Petainist is similarly immaterial. Raisons d'etat, misguided though they may be, explain much. Bosher's account is perhaps more conspiratorial in tone than it needs to be, but it succeeds nonetheless. Perhaps it will be translated into French and sold in Quebec City and Paris, where it might have some impact. General readers; graduate, faculty. J. L. Granatstein York University