It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

At a certain distance from Earth in space no living being can not survive ,even in a spaceship.

page: 17
23
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 30 2012 @ 11:10 PM
link   
So the moon landings were fake??




posted on Jan, 30 2012 @ 11:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lapislazuli
"No living being cannot" is a double negative and your confusing me lol
If you mean that any living being cannot survive at a certain distance past the Earth then thats an interesting theory. What makes you come to this conclusion?



I believe he meant what he said. At a certain distance from earth we can all survive, even if we're in a spaceship.

Just have to figure out how to get up in that big sum beeatch...


edit on 1/30/2012 by ZombieWoof because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 30 2012 @ 11:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
What if someone used a planet as a "space ship?" What about then?


This is interesting... My father me told years ago that basically real ufo's look like planets. I think the movie Star Man and "Wave Length" are examples of real space ships.
edit on 30-1-2012 by Teeky because: word



posted on Jan, 30 2012 @ 11:35 PM
link   
Questions. How come we can not survive in space from a certain distance from earth even in a spaceship? The first part of the sentence can not survive in space. Well, we all know how that goes. Now a spaceship. Can we survive in a spaceship? Well, everything about this is all vaig and is left to a.t.s to figure out what and go on from there .This is why all the different replies to figure out this vaig statement. A thought, A theory of theirs. SO, with that in mind. This is how people think and reply, so let us continue from there with an open mind and ask questions give answers with little ridicule. AFTER all, have you been in space? I find this interesting and who knows, maybe we might learn something from someone after all.



posted on Jan, 30 2012 @ 11:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by LiveEquation
reply to post by diamondsmith
 


Could you provide a scientific proof of your belief?

What you said is the most ridiculous thing i have ever heard. Its like saying:

1. the sun revolves around the sun
2. The earth is flat.
3. Above the sky nothing can survive
4. There is no such thing as air because we breathe nothing which we cannot see,smell,touch or capture

Just ridicilous and very offensive
edit on 30-1-2012 by LiveEquation because: (no reason given)




Oh you can smell the air around me after some good Vindaloo from any Indian restaurant!



posted on Jan, 30 2012 @ 11:46 PM
link   
reply to post by diamondsmith
 


Have you done any research into the early space program at all, the russians sent many animals into space, tested many space suits on monkeys etc.... I think you are abit confused and may be talking about the van allen radiation belt which they apparently have a work around for, it is also alot weaker at the poles...



posted on Jan, 31 2012 @ 12:01 AM
link   
the higher you go the higher radiation you will absorb, 230 miles of atomospere is your protection on earth leave the earth leave your protection , stay gone to long and your toast!



posted on Jan, 31 2012 @ 12:03 AM
link   
reply to post by diamondsmith
 


Most animals don't survive long out of their environment due to large temp differences etc, however the human body is alot more adaptable, we can go from the tropics to snow no problems, from low to high altitude, under water where the pressure increases the deeper u go etc.. Also to say that we are connected on a cellular level and to break that connection would kills us seems silly to me, surely then there would be situations on earth where that connection would break to like a hyperbaric chamber, antigravity training room or even putting on a space suite. Sure scientists have put organisms in a vacumn and they didn't die. Maybe i'm being closed minded but this thread seem very unfeasable.



posted on Jan, 31 2012 @ 12:05 AM
link   
reply to post by diamondsmith
 





first I think they should send a dog,


My dog thinks they should send you
With Kibble and water. She would rather see what happens to you cause its not nice to volunteer other species that lack the vocal expression to voice their discontent about the safety of the mission. Yeah, Lola is kind of a smart A$$.



posted on Jan, 31 2012 @ 12:14 AM
link   
reply to post by namEniks
 


I for one think man has been to the moon, probably more times that stated by gov' and maybe even before 69 but i just read a interesting story to fuel the disbelievers. The rocks that apollo came home with were thought to not exist on earth at all but recently were discovered in abundance in outback australia. On top of that there is a little outback town close by where the older locals "claim" that back in 69 before the moon landing a convoy of big trucks (something similar looking to what a movie production company convoy would look) rolled through the town and stopped for gas. This obviously got everyones attention as they never see that kind of thing in outback oz....



posted on Jan, 31 2012 @ 12:23 AM
link   
reply to post by arbiture
 



And how well and effortfully works, it scars me so much.


It scares me very much to see that you write about lecturing in history. I saw incomplete sentences, misspells, missing words, which can mislead the reader/listener, as well as missing punctuation.


Clueless, utterly clueless.


Also, I forgot the topic of the thread by the time I read your post. Where was your contribution to the topic at hand?

CS70


edit on 31-1-2012 by canadiansenior70 because: misplaced text



posted on Jan, 31 2012 @ 12:43 AM
link   
Christ, not you again.

Care to post your proof, OP, or are you just going to dodge it like you have in your other threads?
Surprised the mods let this stuff go on. They close other threads without any proof, why not yours?



posted on Jan, 31 2012 @ 12:59 AM
link   
Sounds like bologna to me.



posted on Jan, 31 2012 @ 01:21 AM
link   
Some people claim past the van allen belt radiation kills you. But if that were the case the aurora should be lit permanently and intensly



posted on Jan, 31 2012 @ 01:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by ZombieWoof

Originally posted by Lapislazuli
"No living being cannot" is a double negative and your confusing me lol
If you mean that any living being cannot survive at a certain distance past the Earth then thats an interesting theory. What makes you come to this conclusion?



I believe he meant what he said. At a certain distance from earth we can all survive, even if we're in a spaceship.

Just have to figure out how to get up in that big sum beeatch...


edit on 1/30/2012 by ZombieWoof because: (no reason given)


I don't not understand what you think.

And, I don't not agree with you.



posted on Jan, 31 2012 @ 01:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by diamondsmith
many proofs are that a mission to the Moon never took place,


care to show us this proof?


to see the effects for a long journey to the moon,and after that a manned spaceship.


they already have sent a manned spaceship...



posted on Jan, 31 2012 @ 02:03 AM
link   
reply to post by diamondsmith
 


Are you serious? The entire challenge of our species is to continue expansion. The only reason why we fight amongs ourselves is because we cannot expand anymore on this planet. Our only logical and progressive path is to expand into space.

If we were back in the 1500s, you'd probably claim that we would die if we sailed too far into the ocean by falling off the edge of the world



posted on Jan, 31 2012 @ 02:15 AM
link   
Actually man, you might be onto something. It's PLAUSABLE. The OP is correct when he says we have only gone a certain distance. Maybe God made it as to where we can only stay on Earth. Knowing that we would eventually get to this point (technologically) he set up some sort of boundery. I dunno maybe I'm talking out of my booty but I would say you COULD be right. It would most definately go hand in hand with the theory that ET's are actually just Extradimentional Beings that are TERESTRIAL. It's something neat to think about though. Good post OP!

Cheers!
F the NWO!



posted on Jan, 31 2012 @ 02:19 AM
link   
reply to post by kickstart
 


We all know that stuff about the russians sending the little critters up there but how far did the animals go? I think that we could make it to the moon but beyond that? Nobody is really sure. . . If I am wrong please give me some links.
thanks!



posted on Jan, 31 2012 @ 02:34 AM
link   
the reason we havent been back to the moon is because we are not putting as much of our budget to it as we were during the 60s also all the corporate helpers turned away from it .
manned missions to moon and other planets is extremely expensive



new topics

top topics



 
23
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join