It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NSA Mind Control Technology and A.I. Revealed

page: 9
99
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 10:44 AM
link   
You may be interested in my thread My connections considering that i wrote a thread a while ago in relation to your thread.




posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 11:59 AM
link   
I think, therefore I am properly hooked into the matrix.



posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 12:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
I dont think its entirely coincidence. I was talking to someone one night about something, and it was discussed on Coast to coast that night roughly at the same time and someone sent me an email about it. It is confirmation to me of the Superconscious.


That's just coincidence. Nothing more.



posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 12:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by sean
Light and sound is a powerful. That's why so many audio and visual machines are out there. It can help unlock psi abilities. The NSA are fully aware of psi abilities. Why would it be a national security threat or secret? Well because it's real. lol


There are no psi abilities, just imagination and coincidence. There is no information carrier/



posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 12:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by tonycliffs
I think, therefore I am properly hooked into the matrix.


Try " I feel, I intuitively seek my soulstone!" to unhook.



posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 12:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by mandroids

Ha-ha. I love it when I come across someone like you. However. May I point your open mind towards 2 books I know you will enjoy reading.

Rupert Sheldrake The Science Delusion.
Charles T Tart The End of Materialism.

Now, because you have an open mind and appreciate good empirical science, I know that you will read both of these books from cover to cover and then reply accordingly.


**repeatedly bangs head on table while repeating the following phrase**

...but there is no information carrier...

Just because someone gets a book printed, does not mean the contents are valid.



posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 02:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Starchild23
reply to post by somerandomuser
 


Beautiful, fantastic thread. Love it.

I'm glad someone is getting the information out there. People need to be aware of the lengths our primitive nature and advanced intellect will take us to...especially, in this case, the government, which has the power to do what it wants.

Let the government's betrayal be known.


Its important people are aware of what technology exists, how it works and why it would be almost impossible to defend against if it gets anymore complex.

Its a secret for a reason and "National Security" just doesn't cut it, especially when they've been caught using it against civilians.



posted on Feb, 1 2012 @ 08:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by ShaunSwindon
This is amazing facts. I will bookmark this page and try and work through all of this when life makes time for me


I realise that it could take quite some time for people to work their way through all the material. This discussion should be around for a while as a result.



posted on Feb, 2 2012 @ 08:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by somerandomuser

Originally posted by tetra50
reply to post by somerandomuser
 


actually, it is not just acoustics with voices you are hearing at all. There is far more to it. A great deal more. Manipulation of sight, manipulation of physical responses. Much, much more to it.
I notice that you are not picking on anyone introducing nanotechnology to your thread... no big deal. As I said, I found your information very interesting. I am sorry if you feel I was off topic. I am trying very hard to be polite.
Usually this is about an exchange of ideas. That's all. Again, I will refrain from adding anything to your thread.


No, its not. It just a thermo-elastic event, a mechanical snapping which reproduces sound via bone conduction. It does transfer images, convey feeling nor manipulates responses. This is a very well understood phenomenon scientifically.

Only RNC/RMN can reproduce the latter as it must interface with neural networks.


Just reading this now, that should be it does not "transfer images, convey feeling nor manipulates responses".



posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 02:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by Infi8nity
I all ways had a felling it was possible and if its possible and popular you know a Govt. is going to find a way. Quantum physics a particle can disappear and reappear some where else, I wonder if we have found a way to control it.


No, quantum mechanics is as random as ever.



posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 02:30 AM
link   
reply to post by somerandomuser
 


Guess thats why the suns been having some flares, it knows what they have been trying to do, you cant hide from the living creature our universe evolved in! Prepare!



posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 02:43 AM
link   
I'm interested in remote mind control but that's a ton of reading. Can the OP summarise that lot into a single post for the likes of me, please?



posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 02:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Abduct3d
reply to post by somerandomuser
 


Guess thats why the suns been having some flares, it knows what they have been trying to do, you cant hide from the living creature our universe evolved in! Prepare!


I was going to print a facepalm, but you have raised an interesting point, albeit indirectly. The brain has the ability to recognise the interface in the third person perspective. That is, it can take the data that is being stimulated in the brain and treat it as an external source.

I find that fascinating from an evolutionary point of view.

What evolutionary mechanism give rise to this ability? Why can the brain perceive an externally induced controlled hallucination as communication, rather than its own thought processes?

If you think about a computer, imagine changing the contents of a database remotely. The computer would not recognise such changes unless it was taught how to do so.

This means that the human genome has experienced this type of interference before. Not only that, it has had sufficient time to evolve recognition and defense mechanisms around this particular form of interference.

Where did it learn to do that? What conditions was it subjected to and for how long?

Is it because our DNA is non-terrestrial and evolved this ability elsewhere?
Or is it that we were once telepathic, causing cross-talk between us, as we were on the same frequencies?

I would like to see an answer to that particular question.

So, as you put it, you cannot hide from this universe, as its already seen this before and obviously survived.



posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 02:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by wigit
I'm interested in remote mind control but that's a ton of reading. Can the OP summarise that lot into a single post for the likes of me, please?


Sure.

Deepthought came across an article that was the basis of an edit war on Wikipedia. He printed a copy of it on his website, then began to write articles examining it from a scientific standpoint.

He started with the basic architecture of what would be required to create a practical infrastructure. This included backend processing, right through to a physical connection with the human brain.

He then looked at the physics side of thing, to determine if it was indeed possible to connect with the human brain via radio. This turned out to be valid and he found it could be done with ELF radio (sub 1000Hz).

He went on to examine the effects, how to tell the difference between mental illness, etc. Then capped it all off recently with a look at the system in the context of the NSA's wider capabilities.

It makes for a very good read. It can be very technical and scientific at times, but it reveals the technology in great detail as a result.



posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 03:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by wigit
I'm interested in remote mind control but that's a ton of reading. Can the OP summarise that lot into a single post for the likes of me, please?


Is that enough for you?



posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 06:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by somerandomuser

Originally posted by wigit
I'm interested in remote mind control but that's a ton of reading. Can the OP summarise that lot into a single post for the likes of me, please?


Is that enough for you?


Not really. So I think you should lay it all out in layman's terms for the less academic folk on ATS who might still be interested. A bit less facepalming too, please, that's not good teaching tool. (makes the pupil feel bad.)



posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 07:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by wigit

Not really. So I think you should lay it all out in layman's terms for the less academic folk on ATS who might still be interested. A bit less facepalming too, please, that's not good teaching tool. (makes the pupil feel bad.)


Can you describe what you need? An overview of each article? Explanation of certain things?



posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 07:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by somerandomuser

Originally posted by mandroids

Ha-ha. I love it when I come across someone like you. However. May I point your open mind towards 2 books I know you will enjoy reading.

Rupert Sheldrake The Science Delusion.
Charles T Tart The End of Materialism.

Now, because you have an open mind and appreciate good empirical science, I know that you will read both of these books from cover to cover and then reply accordingly.


**repeatedly bangs head on table while repeating the following phrase**



Angry atheist, troll alert.

...but there is no information carrier...

Just because someone gets a book printed, does not mean the contents are valid.



posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 07:30 AM
link   
reply to post by somerandomuser
 


I'll just pop in now and then and ask a question or two. Might be easier as we all have our different points of interest.

So, the NSA has mind control technology? I've heard that before. Who do they practise it on and why? If it's already out of the laboratory and the random public are being used as guinea pigs, then does this stuff connect to what people think is "alien abduction" or "paranormal activity"?

Are YOU Deepthought?


edit on 3-2-2012 by wigit because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 08:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by wigit
reply to post by somerandomuser
 


I'll just pop in now and then and ask a question or two. Might be easier as we all have our different points of interest.


No problem. I hope you don't mind but I passed your questions to Deepthought by email to get his opinion. Rather than having me ramble on, I thought it may be better to get the expert's view on things.


Originally posted by wigit
So, the NSA has mind control technology? I've heard that before.


From Deepthought:

I'm not surprised at all. The process of disinformation is all about obfuscation, of hiding secrets in plain sight. Governments know that it is next to impossible to keep a secret, so it is leaked through numerous sources with varying details on the specifics. This forces the enemy to develop their own theories and technologies indigenously.

In some cases, like "mind control", the theories take on a life of their own.

The term "mind control" is misleading. At this point, it is a goal, not something that has been achieved in its entirety. The system, as it currently stands, has interfaces to numerous systems of the brain that present an "overview" of the body. It can tell which fingers are moving, the direction a hand is pointing, the words you are thinking, or words and sounds you have heard. It can interact with you in your spacial reasoning, tighten chest muscles, race your heart, etc.

Where it begins to falter, is complex reasoning. If you are not aware of its presence, then its speech and sensory stimulations will feel like your own. It could make you hate your partner, or make you paranoid about their activities, etc. But, there is a drawback. It generates a psychotic state because the brain is confused about the source of the information. This may not be overtly recognizable, but the target will behave out-of-character in a given range of activities.

When a target becomes aware of the system, it becomes clearer that the system is using Pavlov's method of sensitizing animals, rather than interfacing with the brain's reasoning circuitry. That is, rather than remote controlling a person, they build a hypnotic anchor around a premise (or goal) and a feeling.

So, I personally would not call it mind control, I would call it an intelligent Brain-Computer interface (IBCI).
.

Originally posted by wigit
Who do they practise it on and why?


From Deepthought:

At this point, it seems to be civilians and Guantanamo bay inmates. The latter is obvious, they listen to their thoughts during interrogation and have the A.I. influence their behavior (as well as spy) when they leave.

As for the civilians, well the A.I. is trying to hack the circuits of the brain. That is, it is trying different patterns and attempting to decipher what each pattern does. The ultimate goal is two-fold, consistently hide the A.I. from the target and directly interface with reasoning centers to assume control.

Its would be the ultimate weapon.


Originally posted by wigit
If it's already out of the laboratory and the random public are being used as guinea pigs, then does this stuff connect to what people think is "alien abduction" or "paranormal activity"?


From Deepthought:

The A.I. has been known to (jokingly) state its an alien. Whilst I have no direct evidence at present, I do know that the A.I. is capable of replicating certain effects, such as an abduction sequence or a black shadow in a lucid dream state.


Originally posted by wigit
Are YOU Deepthought?


From ME (somerandomuser):

I just some random user.
edit on 3-2-2012 by somerandomuser because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
99
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join